cs.CCAug 25, 2026

Parameterized Complexity of LpL_p-Lipschitz Constants for Input Convex Neural Networks and LpL_p-Norm Maximization over Zonotopes

Authors: Aritra Das, Vincent Froese, Moritz Grillo, Debayan Gupta, Christoph Hertrich, Tharrshann Jayan Logarajah, Georg Loho, Mihir More, 

Organizations: Ashoka University, Truth Audit Labs · Technische Universität Berlin · Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences · University of Technology Nuremberg · 

Abstract

Lipschitz constants are a standard way to quantify the sensitivity of neural networks to small input perturbations, but computing them is difficult even for shallow ReLU networks. We study this problem for two-layer input-convex neural networks (ICNNs), a restricted architecture where nonnegative output weights enforce convexity. Computing the LpL_p-Lipschitz constant for these networks is equivalent to maximizing the dual norm over a zonotope. While L1L_1- and L∞L_\infty-norm maximization on zonotopes admit fixed-parameter and polynomial-time algorithms, respectively, the parameterized complexity of the remaining LpL_p-norms was open. We prove that, for every fixed p∈(1,∞)∩Qp\in (1,\infty)\cap \mathbb{Q}, maximizing the LpL_p-norm over a zonotope in Rd\mathbb{R}^d is W[1]-hard with respect to the dimension dd. Moreover, our hardness results imply that brute-force enumeration algorithms are essentially optimal for this problem under the Exponential Time Hypothesis. By duality, the same hardness results hold for computing the LpL_p-Lipschitz constant of two-layer ReLU ICNNs. Our proof first establishes the result for the L2L_2-norm and then transfers the construction to arbitrary fixed p∈(1,∞)∩Qp\in (1,\infty)\cap\mathbb{Q} using a suitable Taylor approximation. These results resolve the corresponding questions regarding the parameterized complexity status for zonotope norm maximization and two-layer ICNN Lipschitz constants. Our paper resolves an open problem posted at COLT'25. There are several independent concurrent papers resolving the same problem. Our paper prioritizes a clear exposition of the underlying mathematics and conceptual intuitions behind the proof. Additionally, we explicitly describe our research process including the use of LLMs.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables1 asset

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Parameterized Hardness of Zonotope Containment and Neural Network Verification

    Sep 26, 2025Vincent Froese, Moritz Grillo, Christoph Hertrich +1Neural Network VerificationParameterized Complexity