Vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly rely on point coordinates as a compact and executable interface for visual grounding in GUI interaction, robotic manipulation, and interactive visual systems. However, learning reliable pointing behavior remains difficult because the supervision space is inherently non-unique: many coordinates may be valid within the same target region, while multi-instance instructions require target coverage, count consistency, and duplicate suppression. This work presents PointRL, a verifiable reinforcement learning framework that learns point-level grounding from existing heterogeneous annotation evidence. PointRL converts bounding boxes, masks, and instance labels into pointing instructions, while retaining their target supports, instance membership, and set constraints as hidden verifier evidence, i.e., annotations kept outside the prompt and used by a deterministic checker to score predictions. The proposed reward evaluates parseability, point validity, instance coverage, cardinality consistency, and redundant or missing predictions. On PointArena, PointRL improves the overall accuracy of Qwen3.5-4B from 56.11% to 65.58%. Further evaluations on RoboSpatial, BLINK, and Ref-Adv show same-backbone gains on the evaluated external benchmarks, suggesting that verifiable point-level feedback may benefit spatial grounding in these settings.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Task illustration for verifiable point-level grounding. A valid response should place points on the intended target supports, while nearby distractors, incomplete coverage, or shortcut outputs are rejected by the verifier.
Fig. 2: Construction of verifiable pointing samples from raw annotations. The pipeline normalizes annotation sources into object entities, collects supporting evidence, and generates the instruction with hidden verifier evidence V=(T,C) . The target set and constraints are then fixed by rule-based checks.
Rule
Count
Evidence
Check
Functional
262
AGD regions
Affordance support
Instance
345
COCO/PixMo instances
Coverage/count
Semantic
249
Class labels
Category match
Relation
393
Entity pairs
Spatial relation
Cue
398
Cue-target pairs
Shortcut guard
Total
1,647
Mixed evidence
Rule-checked targets
TABLE I: Composition of accepted PointRL-Data rules.
Fig. 3: Point reward computation from hidden verifier evidence. The reward module parses the final answer into a point collection, matches predictions to hidden verifier targets with Hungarian matching, and combines matched-pair localization quality with set-level coverage and count checks. Format and instruction-conditioned guards suppress invalid or shortcut responses before returning the core verifier point reward.
Fig. 4: Local and global reward behavior for a multi-instance query. Green circles lie in target supports and red crosses lie outside. Local reward measures point-target quality, whereas global reward penalizes missed targets, incorrect counts, and collapsed predictions. The same formulation handles singleton targets.
Fig. 5: Qualitative comparison on PointArena Point-Bench. Each category panel shows Qwen3.5-4B on the left and Qwen3.5-4B + PointRL on the right. Red and green circular markers denote the corresponding baseline and PointRL predictions; blue rings mark reference or current points in steerable examples, and translucent green regions indicate target supports when shown.
Method
Params
Affordance
Counting
Reasoning
Spatial
Steerable
Overall Acc
GPT-4o
N/D
42.42
31.12
23.83
25.64
24.50
29.50
Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct
7B
76.77
52.55
53.89
61.54
36.50
56.25
Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct
72B
76.77
57.14
54.40
60.00
46.50
58.96
Molmo-72B
72B
87.88
54.59
69.43
70.26
37.00
63.83
Gemini-Robotics-ER-1.5
N/D
69.70
68.47
60.10
69.74
67.50
67.10
Qwen3.5-2B
2B
34.34
10.20
32.12
33.85
16.00
25.25
TABLE II: Main results on PointArena Point-Bench.
Fig. 6: Comparison of reward configurations on multi-target pointing examples. Each row is one query; columns show the pretrained baseline, localization-only reward, localization plus target coverage, cue-copying shortcut cap, cue-copying shortcut cap with progress shaping, and the full PointRL reward. Red points denote predicted point collections.
Method
Affordance
Counting
Reasoning
Spatial
Steerable
Overall Acc
Qwen3.5-4B
65.66
47.45
58.55
69.23
40.00
56.11
+ Loc. only
69.19
59.18
60.62
69.23
43.00
60.18
+ Loc. + Cov.
67.17
57.14
68.91
71.28
48.00
62.42
+ Cue cap
67.68
55.10
66.32
68.72
49.50
61.41
+ Cue cap + Prog.
69.70
56.63
66.84
66.15
41.00
59.98
+ Full reward
75.25
60.71
70.47
71.28
50.50
65.58
TABLE III: Reward ablation on PointArena Point-Bench.
Fig. 7: External-benchmark examples on Ref-Adv and RoboSpatial-Home. In each pair, the left panel shows Qwen3.5-4B and the right panel shows Qwen3.5-4B + PointRL. In the Ref-Adv row, red boxes are predictions, blue boxes are targets, and IoU is reported above each panel. In the RoboSpatial-Home row, green regions mark valid target regions; red and green dots denote baseline and PointRL predictions, respectively.
Fig. 8: Ref-Adv predictions under increasing distractor counts. The three example groups correspond to 2–3, 4–6, and ≥7 distractors from left to right; within each group, the left panel is Qwen3.5-4B and the right panel is Qwen3.5-4B + PointRL. Red boxes denote predictions, blue boxes denote targets, and IoU is reported above each panel.
Method
Context
Config.
Compat.
BLINK
Molmo
0.00
48.70
24.80
67.10
GPT-4o
6.60
74.00
55.20
76.20
RoboPoint
2.50
59.40
80.10
63.60
RoboPoint + RoboSpatial +
21.30
70.00
88.60
70.60
LLaVA-NeXT + RoboSpatial +
19.70
76.40
80.10
79.00
Qwen3.5-4B (baseline)
27.05
79.67
25.71
66.43
TABLE IV: External evaluation on RoboSpatial and BLINK. All values are percentages under the official benchmark metrics. The three RoboSpatial columns report the Context, Configuration, and Compatibility splits. Methods marked with + use benchmark-specific training data.
Pointing-based visual grounding requires models to precisely locate target objects by deciphering complex spatial relationships between the visual scene and pointing gestures. Traditional methods typically encode input images into static feature representations and perform reasoning primarily within the linguistic domain, often overlooking the rich perceptual cues and explicit spatial geometry inherent in images. In this study, we aim to mitigate the cognitive vulnerability of models in interpreting gestural spatial relations by proposing PointVG-R, a reasoning-guided Multi-modal Large Language Model (MLLM). PointVG-R introduces geometric-aware reasoning for pointing-based grounding, enabling the model to think with images through the strategic integration of Reinforcement Learning (RL) and cold-start data. Specifically, we design a novel geometric reasoning pipeline that simulates the iterative cognitive process humans employ when interpreting pointing gestures. Furthermore, we construct EgoPoint-CoT, a high-quality visual Chain-of-Thought (CoT) dataset featuring detailed reasoning trajectories to guide the model via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and RL. To address the varying quality of learning signals encountered during training, we further propose an Adaptive Importance Weighting strategy based on Group Variance, which dynamically adjusts reward signals to optimize the learning process. Experimental results demonstrate that PointVG-R achieves SOTA performance, outperforming the baseline by 15.86 points in mIoU. Extensive ablation studies further validate the efficacy of our proposed modules. Code: https://github.com/lingli1724/PointVG-R.
Ling Li, Bowen Liu, Zinuo Zhan +5
Tsinghua University Beijing Shi, China · Dalian University of Technology Dalian Shi, China · Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi’an Shi, China +1
Grounding has become a fundamental capability of vision-language models (VLMs). Most existing VLMs point by generating coordinates as part of their text output, which requires learning a complicated coordinate system and results in a high token count. Instead, we propose a more intuitive pointing mechanism that directly selects the visual tokens that contain the target concept. Our model generates a special pointing token that cross-attends to the input image or video tokens and selects the appropriate one. To make this model more fine-grained, we follow these pointing tokens with an additional special token that selects a fine-grained subpatch within the initially selected region, and then a third token that specifies a location within that subpatch. We further show that performance improves by generating points sequentially in a consistent order, encoding the relative position of the previously selected point, and including a special no-more-points class when selecting visual tokens. Using this method, we set a new state-of-the-art on image pointing (70.7% on PointBench), set a new state-of-the-art among fully open models on GUI pointing (61.1% on ScreenSpotPro), and improve video pointing (59.1% human preference win rate vs. a text coordinate baseline) and tracking (+6.3% gain on Molmo2Track). We additionally show that our method achieves much higher sample efficiency and discuss the qualitative differences that emerge from this design change.
Vision-language-action (VLA) models often expose spatial grounding through autoregressive text coordinates or opaque action tokens, creating brittle interfaces between multimodal reasoning and robot execution. We present Pointing-VLA, a typed hidden-state spatial readout built on Embodied-R1. Geometry-specific heads predict normalized points, object-functional grounding (OFG) heatmaps, and visual trajectories without serializing geometry as text. For the evaluated Bridge/WidowX and physical pick-place deployments, an explicit execution contract assigns PICK to source-conditioned OFG and PLACE to Pointing, providing direct stage-aligned spatial targets. Pointing-VLA achieves SOTA performance on Bridge/WidowX, averaging 72.9% across the evaluated four-task set without Bridge-specific finetuning under collision-enabled CuRobo execution. Pointing and OFG show complementary strengths across native and cross-dataset evaluations. The OFG/contact readout transfers to NORA-1.5, preserving or improving success while reducing recorded controller time by more than 20×; typed heads are also 6.68--6.90× faster than Embodied-R1 text decoding on a shared external suite. When integrated as spatial guidance for a π0.5 action policy, Pointing-VLA raises autonomous real-robot success from 52.7% to 80.7% across three visual contexts. These results establish typed spatial readouts as an efficient, inspectable interface between embodied reasoning and robot execution.
Xiwen Chen, Zelin Li, Zhiruo Zhou +3
SIGS, Tsinghua University, China · Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China · Wuhan University of Technology, China +2