Capacity Overflow: A Blind Spot for Backdoor Attacks in Vision MoE

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) networks promise favorable accuracy-compute trade-offs, yet practical vision deployments are hindered by expert collapse and limited end-to-end efficiency gains. We study when sparse top-$k$ routing with hard capacity constraints helps in vision classification, evaluated under multi-seed protocols on four benchmarks (CIFAR-10/100, Tiny-ImageNet, ImageNet-1K). We observe a compute-leverage pattern: positive accuracy gaps require a substantial fraction $ρ$ of total FLOPs to be routed; at ImageNet scale this is necessary but not sufficient, as multi-expert routing ($k \geq 2$) is additionally required. Two controlled experiments isolate these factors. A hidden-size sweep on CIFAR-10 yields both predicted sign reversals across standard and depthwise backbones, ruling out backbone family as the active variable. An ImageNet-1K ablation that varies only top-$k$ -- holding architecture, initialization, and $ρ$ fixed -- reverses the gap from positive to negative across all five seeds. A per-sample variant of Soft MoE that softmaxes over experts rather than the batch rescues CIFAR-100 above the dense baseline, identifying batch-axis dispatch as the dominant failure mode in per-sample CNN settings. Code and aggregate results: https://github.com/libophd/sparse-moe-vision-rho.

We present CLEAR-MoE, a four-phase post-training pipeline that converts a frozen pretrained Vision Transformer (ViT) into a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model without updating backbone weights. The pipeline (i) scores feed-forward network (FFN) layers by sparsity, clusterability, and output sensitivity; (ii) decomposes selected layers into a shared low-rank SVD basis and per-cluster residual experts using k-means clustering; (iii) trains lightweight routers supervised by cluster labels; and (iv) dispatches tokens through pluggable CUDA backends. On Imagenette with DeiT-Small, CLEAR-MoE retains 99.9% of the dense model's accuracy (86.70 +/- 0.02% versus 86.73%). Extensive ablation studies reveal a consistent empirical finding: the shared SVD basis is the primary factor responsible for preserving accuracy. Random routing, learned routing, and three different router architectures produce nearly identical performance, with accuracy varying by at most 0.06 percentage points (86.62%-86.68%). Accuracy also remains stable across different SVD ranks, expert counts (2-8), calibration set sizes (50-500), and random seeds. This behavior generalizes across five ViT backbones (DeiT-Tiny, DeiT-Small, DeiT-Base, ViT-Small, and ViT-Base), covering models from 5.7M to 86.6M parameters, with accuracy differences <= 0.10 percentage points from their dense counterparts. On a GTX 960 GPU, routing and scatter-gather overhead make the CLEAR-MoE FFN 1.3-1.7x slower than the dense implementation. A dispatch microbenchmark further shows that routing is an order of magnitude more memory-bound than expert matrix multiplications, identifying fused dispatch kernels as a promising direction for future optimization.

Vision encoders are a critical component of vision-language models, and scaling their capacity effectively improves performance. However, dense scaling increases compute cost and inference latency. Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures offer a compelling alternative, having enabled efficient scaling in LLMs, yet the MoE design space for CLIP-style vision encoders remains underexplored at State-of-the-Art (SOTA) levels. In this work, we systematically study MoE designs for vision encoder scaling and find that fine-grained MoE topologies yield substantial gains over both dense and standard MoE counterparts. We further propose an auxiliary-loss-free balancing variant for better expert utilization, and design a specialized MoE kernel to mitigate inference latency overhead. To enhance video capabilities while preserving image knowledge, we introduce frame-level distillation paired with a novel freezing mechanism. We pretrain a series of Mixture-of-Experts Vision Encoders (MoE-ViE) across a range of sizes, all consistently outperforming their dense counterparts. Our largest model matches the zero-shot performance of a SOTA encoder 1.7x its size at 76% of its latency. When aligned with an LLM, MoE-ViE surpasses all compared encoders on image and video benchmarks, including those with up to 5x more activated parameters. Code is available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/moe_vie.