MA-VLA: Multi-Arm Vision-Language-Action Model for Collaboration and Compositional Generalization

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are typically deployed as isolated single-agent policies. When several such agents share a workspace, they can coordinate implicitly, by observing one another, or explicitly, by exchanging messages, but it remains unclear when explicit communication becomes necessary. We introduce CoLA (Coordination via Learned Adapters), which keeps each agent's VLA backbone frozen and trains a lightweight message channel and a per-arm diffusion action head on top, with fully decentralised execution. Across three tasks that differ in how much each agent can observe, the channel matters only when information is private. On an occluded tray handover, where the box's colour marker is visible to one agent only, CoLA reaches 76.0% success versus 1.3% with messages zeroed throughout training. On two-arm and three-arm handover tasks, removing messages has no measurable effect with a shared overhead camera (90.6% vs. 88.3% at two arms; 63.5% vs. 60.0% at three), but lowers success on the two-arm task's wrist-only variant (74.8% vs. 64.3%). This architecture generalises across different VLA backbones as well. With a frozen $π_{0.5}$ backbone on the same occluded tray task, CoLA matches the overall success rate of a LoRA-fine-tuned baseline (37.3% vs. 34.7%) using a fraction of the trainable parameters. When CoLA places the box, it selects the correct tray 71.8% of the time, whereas the independently fine-tuned baseline, whose placing arm never sees the marker, selects it at chance level (34.7% against 33.3%).

Vision-language-action (VLA) models show strong capabilities in single and dual-arm robotic manipulation. Prior works show coordinated bimanual behaviors can emerge from end-to-end learning, leveraging large vision-language backbones with continuous action prediction. However, as bimanual tasks become tightly coupled and execution constraints become critical, implicit coordination alone is insufficient to ensure reliable, interpretable, and stable behavior. In this work, we propose Co-VLA, a coordination-aware bimanual manipulation framework introducing explicit structural priors into VLA models. We instantiate our method on a state-of-the-art vision-language backbone by replacing its monolithic action head with a Structured Action Expert (SAE) designed for bimanual coordination. Specifically, we introduce explicit structure at the action generation level with a modular coordination-aware loss that shapes shared and residual latents according to task-specific structures. The shared latent encodes task-level coordination intent, while residual latents capture execution adjustments for each arm. At deployment, a Latent-Aware Controller (LAC) interprets the learned representations to modulate synchronization strength, execution asymmetry, smoothness, and safety constraints in real time. LAC operates at the joint-command level and remains compatible with standard control pipelines without requiring force or impedance control. Experiments across simulation and real-world benchmarks show Co-VLA significantly outperforms monolithic baselines, achieving a 27% success rate gain in tight-coordination tasks, more than doubling performance in OOD real-world scenarios (from 13% to 27%), and reducing task completion time by up to 25%.

A fine-tuned Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policy can easily place the alphabet soup in the basket on command, just as it saw during fine-tuning. However, if the basket is shifted five centimeters to the left, it drops the soup off the table. We developed an interpretability pipeline to investigate what such a policy is computing. Injecting task A's activations into the action expert while the policy looks at task B's scene makes pi0.5 execute task A's motor trajectory in 99.6% of episodes ($n{=}1{,}968$). The injected program is bound to absolute workspace coordinates and ignores the visible scene, which provides a mechanistic account of the perturbation brittleness that concurrent benchmarks report. The binding holds on a physical UR10e: directed replay redirects the commanded task in 26/26 rollouts in one direction and 18/26 in the other, with no-injection and random-direction controls at the floor, and once the source object is moved 10--15,cm the arm grasps and releases at the recorded coordinates in 50/50 trials, picking up the wrong block when one sits there and closing on empty air when none does. Applying the same interventions to six VLAs on LIBERO, MetaWorld, SimplerEnv, and ALOHA over 420{,}000+ rollouts yields three further findings: every architecture encodes the instruction, and four of the five weight it below vision whenever the scene alone identifies the goal; under the standard replacement write-back the SAE pooling that preserves behavior is architecture-specific (pi0.5 per-token, X-VLA mean-pool, SmolVLA indifferent), and goal selection and motor generation separate into VLM and expert pathways wherever the two are distinguishable. We release Action Atlas (https://action-atlas.com), an interactive platform covering all 520+ trained SAEs, 79 identified concepts, and the scored UR10e rollouts. Code: https://github.com/CWRU-AISM/action-atlas