Recent large language models achieve strong performance on complex reasoning tasks, where reinforcement learning with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as a leading paradigm for optimizing models on self-generated trajectories. However, the on-policy nature of GRPO bounds the model to the reasoning skills it can already produce, restricting to learn more advanced capabilities. Prior works inject privileged reasoning traces from a stronger teacher policy to guide training, yet these traces are inherently out of distribution with respect to the student policy. We observe that this mismatch between on-policy and off-policy causes gradient clipping on semantically critical reasoning tokens, ultimately rewarding correct answers while leaving the reasoning that justifies them unlearned. Hence, we propose Echo-GRPO, a framework that lets the model reason in the words it speaks. Rather than imitating low-probability privileged traces from the teacher model, Echo-GRPO rewrites them into the student policy's own idiolect, that is, its own characteristic vocabulary and expression patterns, while preserving their semantics via Dual-Reference Decoding. We instantiate this framework as VideoEcho-R1 for video reasoning distillation, achieving consistent improvements across three multimodal LLM backbones and five benchmarks. Finally, we show that our idiolectal paraphrasing is a plug-in module that consistently improves both RL and supervised fine-tuning frameworks for reasoning distillation, demonstrating that policy-aligned supervision extends beyond GRPO.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Reasoning in the words you know. Token-level log-probabilities under the policy πθ (red shading indicates low probability). Top: Mixed-Policy GRPO forces the policy to imitate privileged reasoning traces from a stronger teacher, leaving semantically critical ones, such as “school of fish,” in low-likelihood regions. Bottom: Echo-GRPO paraphrases the same reasoning into the policy’s native distribution (“school of fish” → “several fish”), preserving the semantics while keeping all tokens within the policy’s distribution.
Figure 2: (a) (top) Number of samples containing at least one clipped token throughout training for Mixed-Policy GRPO (red), and Echo-GRPO (blue). (bottom) Ratio of semantically important tokens ( e.g. , nouns from the question and options) among all clipped tokens for each method. (b) Token-level visualization of clipping behavior on a representative video reasoning sample, where grey boxes indicate clipped tokens and red shading denotes per-token loss intensity.
Clipping Method
Priv. Trace
Avg.
Δ
Mixed-Policy
OOD
35.9
–
+ Unclip all tokens
OOD
40.8
+4.9
+ Unclip random tokens
OOD
48.4
+12.5
+ Unclip semantic tokens
OOD
52.0
+16.1
Echo-GRPO (Ours)
ID
58.2
+22.3
Table 1: Effect of clipping on Mixed-Policy failure. OOD and ID refer to Out-of-distribution and In-distribution, respectively. Performance is averaged over three major benchmarks: VideoMMMU, MMVU, and Video-Holmes.
Figure 3: Overview of Echo-GRPO. Given a video question and a privileged reasoning trace y~ , Echo-GRPO adopts an idiolectal paraphrased trace yrewrite produced by Dual-Reference Decoding (DRD). DRD combines two conditional distributions of πθ0 as a product of distributions: the semantic reference (yellow) constrains token selection to be faithful to y~ , correcting the base policy’s preference for semantically incorrect tokens ( e.g. , ‘bag’ to ‘box’); while distribution alignment (blue) resolves ties among semantically equivalent candidates by preferring tokens the student policy is more likely to generate ( e.g. , ‘visible’ over ‘shown’), keeping the rewritten trace aligned to its naive distribution.
Figure 4: Prompt for idiolectal paraphrasing. The privileged reasoning trace y~ corresponds to ( {{PRIVILEGED REASONING TRACE}} ). We append the question and options at the end of the prompt. For the Question and Options we follow the format of OneThinker [ 21 ] . Further details are in the supplement.
Figure 5: Training Dynamics of Echo-GRPO.
Figure 6: Training Dynamics of idiolectal paraphrasing as a plug-in.
Figure 8
Method
Priv.
V-MMMU
MMVU
VHolm
Avg.
SFT
y~
48.2
62.9
40.8
50.6
yrewrite
56.3
64.0
37.6
52.6
SFT → GRPO
y~
57.5
66.2
44.0
55.9
yrewrite
58.2
68.8
49.5
58.8
Table 5: Comparison of SFT and SFT → GRPO using offline ( y~ ) and idiolectal paraphrased traces ( yrewrite ).
Figure 9: Qualitative example. Mixed-Policy GRPO (top) mimics the structural format of privileged traces, defaulting to narrative speculation (“this is part of a fictional series, so the answer is likely…”) and predicting the wrong answer (A: Neighbor). Echo-GRPO (bottom) instead references concrete events from the video (highlighted in green) and reaches the correct answer (B: Kidnapper).
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
top- k
VideoMMMU
MMVU
VideoHolmes
Avg.
1
58.1
67.9
45.1
57.0
5
59.1
68.8
46.7
58.2
10
57.1
65.0
38.2
53.4
Appendix
Table 7: Sensitivity of top- k in DRD.
Method
AIME24
AIME25
HMMT25
Avg.
Δ
Base
16.7
26.7
10.0
17.8
–
Mixed-Policy
36.7
40.0
16.7
31.1
+13.3
GRPO
40.0
40.0
20.0
33.3
+15.5
Echo-GRPO
53.3
46.7
23.3
41.1
+23.3
Appendix
Table 8: Effect of Echo-GRPO on text reasoning benchmarks.
Method
Avg. Perf. ( ↑ )
Avg. Clip ( ↓ ) (%)
0–100
100–200
200–300
300–400
400–500
500+
Base
50.5
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Mixed-Policy
51.7 (+1.2)
26.1
11.2
9.0
21.5
44.6
42.1
28.2
GRPO
56.4 (+5.9)
7.8
9.6
8.4
8.2
6.9
7.7
5.7
Echo-GRPO
58.2 (+7.7)
7.9
10.2
8.6
7.3
7.5
8.1
5.5
Appendix
Table 9: Performance and clipping statistics during scaled-up training. The average performance covers three major benchmarks: VideoMMMU, MMVU, and Video-Holmes. Average Clip presents the average percentage of samples clipped throughout the steps.
Strategy
Avg.
Δ vs. GRPO
Offline cost †
GRPO
56.0
–
–
Echo-GRPO w/o DRD
56.9
+0.9
9.4 ms/token
Echo-GRPO w/ DRD
58.2
+2.2
163.9 ms/token
Appendix
Table 10: Performance vs. offline construction cost. Avg. denotes the mean performance across VideoMMMU, MMVU, and Video-Holmes. Idiolectal paraphrasing is performed once during data construction; it introduces no additional training or inference-time overhead.
GRPO-style RLVR trains reasoning models from multiple on-policy attempts per prompt, but typically uses these attempts only through terminal rewards. We show that a mixed group contains a richer process signal: a correct completion is a self-generated witness of how the current policy can solve the problem, while a wrong completion provides on-policy prefixes where the policy needs correction. We introduce Self-Supervised On-Policy Distillation (SSOPD), which distills a teacher distribution conditioned on the shortest correct completion into prefixes of the longest wrong completion. This converts intra-group correct--wrong contrast into dense process supervision without external solution traces. A stopping-time view motivates the shortest-correct / longest-wrong rule as a finite-group approximation to editing persistent failures toward fast-success actions, and a prompt-level frontier weight concentrates the auxiliary loss where correct and wrong branches coexist. Across AIME 2024, AIME 2025, and HMMT 2025, SSOPD improves over GRPO in all nine model-benchmark settings. On Qwen3-8B, it reaches a macro Avg@12 of 65.6, outperforming GRPO by 1.6 points and the solution-conditioned OPSD baseline by 0.8 points. Code will be released at https://github.com/tzq1999/SSOPD.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has substantially improved the reasoning ability of multimodal language models through verifiable rewards and increasingly fine-grainedvisual or temporal credit assignment. In video reasoning, however, current RL methods typically train with a fixed sparse frame budget: increasing the number of frames makes autoregressive rollouts expensive, while too few frames may miss temporally localized events and fine-grained visual details. We present Frame Differential On-Policy Self-Distillation (FD-OPSD), which transfers the useful evidence of dense frame observations to a sparse frame policy during RL training. FD-OPSD compares the policy's token level preferences for the same sampled response under sparse and dense views, and distills the resulting frame differential signal without an external teacher or dense autoregressive rollout. The method preserves sparse-frame rollouts and leaves inference unchanged. Across Qwen2.5-VL-7B and Qwen3-VL-4B on six video reasoning benchmarks, FD-OPSD yields higher overall average performance than the strongest corresponding GRPO, T-GRPO, or Video-KTR baselines across the 16, 32, and 64 frame evaluation settings. These results show that dense visual evidence can be transferred selectively during training through token level self-distillation while retaining sparse frame rollouts and unchanged inference.
On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has recently emerged as an effective post-training paradigm that improves policy optimization through dense token-level supervision from a privileged self-teacher. Despite its promise, OPSD remains largely underexplored for Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs). Existing methods typically construct privileged teachers by augmenting their context with additional information while keeping the primary input unchanged for both teacher and student. Video reasoning, however, offers a distinct source of privileged supervision within the primary input itself: long videos contain substantial temporal redundancy, and only a small subset of frames provides the evidence necessary to answer a question. Building on this observation, we present Video-OPSD, an OPSD framework that exploits privileged visual evidence for both self-teacher construction and knowledge transfer. First, our Evidence-Grounded Self-Teacher conditions the teacher exclusively on annotated evidence frames while the student continues to reason over the complete video. This focused visual input enables the teacher to provide more informative supervision. Second, our Evidence-Guided Token Optimization adaptively weights token-level distillation according to each reasoning token's reliance on privileged visual evidence, thereby emphasizing perceptually grounded reasoning. Experiments across video understanding and reasoning benchmarks show that Video-OPSD consistently improves upon Standard OPSD across multiple backbones and achieves performance comparable to GRPO while requiring substantially less training time, establishing an effective and efficient post-training approach for Video-LLMs.
Ziyue Wang, Shiqi Huang, Weiwen Xu +2
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University · The Chinese University of Hong Kong