Parameter Efficient Continual Learning for Sparse Event-Based Transformers
Organizations: SustainAI Lab, MFSDS&AI IIT Guwahati
Abstract
Robotic and edge intelligence systems operate in dynamic environments where data arrives continuously, requiring models to adapt while preserving previously learned knowledge under strict memory and energy constraints. While parameter-efficient fine-tuning has shown promise for continual learning with vision transformers, conventional architectures rely on dense computation and remain costly for real-world deployment. Sparse event-based vision transformers provide energy-efficient event-driven computation, yet their continual learning capabilities remain largely unexplored. We here introduce sLoTh, a parameter-efficient continual learning framework for pretrained sparse event-based (spiking) vision transformers. sLoTh freezes the backbone and restricts plasticity to scalable-efficient low-rank attention updates (seLoRA) and shared neuronal threshold modulation, enabling adaptation without replay buffers by updating less than 1% of model parameters. Experiments across CIFAR-100, Tiny-ImageNet, ImageNet-100, and ImageNet-R with up to 100 tasks demonstrate competitive rehearsal-free performance in class-incremental learning and online continual learning, while enabling approximately 6.5x lower energy consumption than conventional dense vision transformers.
Figures & tables
| Methods | T=10 | T=20 | T=50 | Total Param(M) | updates(M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2P Wang et al. (2022b) | 83.18 1.20 | 79.51 0.67 | 67.95 2.12 | 172 | 0.12 |
| DualPrompt Wang et al. (2022a) | 81.48 0.86 | 80.44 1.38 | 72.5 1.08 | 172 | 0.86 |
| CODA-Prompt Smith et al. (2023) | 86.31 0.12 | 81.36 0.88 | 73.77 0.98 | 172 | 4.6 |
| InfLoRA Liang and Li (2024) | 86.75 0.35 | 80.97 0.74 | 70.68 1.26 | 172 | 0.51 |
| SD-LoRA Wu et al. (2025) | 88.01 0.31 | OOM | OOM | 172 | 0.39 |
| Full sLoTh | 81.23 1.74 | 84.65 1.46 | 87.22 1.59 | 64.32 | 0.44 |
| Method | Imagenet-R ( ) | Imagenet-R ( ) | Imagenet-R ( ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Fine tuning | 64.92 0.87 | 60.57 1.06 | 49.95 1.31 |
| L2P Wang et al. (2022b) | 73.04 0.71 | 71.26 0.44 | 68.97 0.51 |
| DualPrompt Wang et al. (2022a) | 69.99 0.57 | 68.22 0.20 | 65.23 0.45 |
| CODA-Prompt Smith et al. (2023) | 76.63 0.27 | 74.05 0.41 | 69.38 0.33 |
| InfLoRA Liang and Li (2024) | 76.95 0.23 | 74.75 0.64 | 69.89 0.56 |
| SD-LoRA Wu et al. (2025) | 79.15 0.20 | 77.34 0.35 | 75.26 0.37 |
| CIFAR100 (T=10) | Tiny-ImageNet (T=100) | |||
| Method | Avg Acc | Forgetting | Avg Acc | Forgetting |
| ER Rolnick et al. (2019) | 39.41 1.81 | 13.29 | 24.71 2.52 | 40.77 |
| OCM Guo et al. (2022) | 42.22 1.06 | 3.76 | 31.94 1.19 | 15.92 |
| OnPro Wei et al. (2023) | 41.59 1.38 | 6.72 | 26.38 2.18 | 20.32 |
| OCM-CCLDC Wang et al. (2024) | 51.43 1.37 | 3.99 | 39.25 0.88 | 15.56 |
| OnPro-CCLDC Wang et al. (2024) | 50.01 0.85 | 10.55 | 38.18 1.02 | 16.17 |
| Methods | Avg Acc ( ) | Forgetting ( ) | # Updates | Energy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGEM Chaudhry et al. (2018b) | 12.67 1.87 | 82.51 2.27 | Full | 254.84 |
| ER Rolnick et al. (2019) | 44.85 1.83 | 44.67 4.29 | Full | 254.84 |
| EWC++ Chaudhry et al. (2018a) | 10.61 0.74 | 84.10 1.11 | Full | 254.84 |
| MIR Aljundi et al. (2019a) | 48.36 3.11 | 43.41 1.02 | Full | 254.84 |
| PCR Lin et al. (2023) | 48.48 0.15 | 46.23 1.29 | Full | 254.84 |
| LODE (DER++) Liang and Li (2023) | 44.29 1.48 | 45.54 3.32 | Full | 254.84 |
| ViT | QKFormer | ||||||
| Method | L2P | Online LoRA | seLoRA | Online LoRA | Full sLoTh | Threshold only | seLoRA only |
| Accuracy | 56.25 0.45 | 60.38 2.59 | 55.68 0.97 | 61.87 1.63 | 62.14 1.30 | 66.91 1.56 | 70.00 3.85 |
| Variant | CIL Avg Acc | OCL Avg Acc | param updates |
|---|---|---|---|
| seLoRA only (w/o Threshold) | 72.63 1.24 | 63.88 1.03 | 0.402 |
| Threshold only (w/o seLoRA) | 69.39 1.01 | 60.25 0.98 | |
| Full sLoTh (seLoRA + Threshold) | 81.23 1.74 | 55.12 1.18 | 0.439 |
| Components | Non-zeros | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 55.12 1.18 | 10.23 1.10 | 21.64 2.38 | 20.11 1.09 |
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Hyperparameter | CIFAR-100 | Imagenet-R | Imagenet-100 | Tiny-IM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batch size | 128 | 64 | 64 | 128 |
| Time steps (T) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Learning rate | 1e-4 | 3e-4 | 3e-4 | 1e-4 |
| Epochs | 50 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Optimizer | AdamW | AdamW | AdamW | AdamW |
| Method | Low-Rank Adaptation Hu et al. (2022) | Adapters Houlsby et al. (2019) | Spiking Adapters | Thresholds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 80.89 | 87.21 | 79.82 | 70.56 |
| Tasks | Tiny-ImageNet | CIFAR-100 | ImageNet-R | Imagenet-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 85.23 2.94 | 87.38 1.63 | 86.77 1.08 | 89.33 1.78 |
| 20 | 87.17 1.38 | 86.84 2.54 | 88.45 2.79 | 90.92 1.63 |
| 50 | 96.50 1.25 | 91.20 2.71 | 93.61 1.81 | 94.5 1.95 |
| Methods | T=10 | T=20 | T=50 | Total Param. | updates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2P Wang et al. (2022b) | 83.18 1.20 | 79.51 0.67 | 67.95 2.12 | 172 | 0.12 |
| DualPrompt Wang et al. (2022a) | 81.48 0.86 | 80.44 1.38 | 72.5 1.08 | 172 | 0.86 |
| CODA-Prompt Smith et al. (2023) | 86.31 0.12 | 81.36 0.88 | 73.77 0.98 | 172 | 4.6 |
| InfLoRA Liang and Li (2024) | 86.75 0.35 | 80.97 0.74 | 70.68 1.26 | 172 | 0.51 |
| SD-LoRA Wu et al. (2025) | 88.01 0.31 | OOM | OOM | 172 | 0.39 |
| Full sLoTh | 81.23 1.74 | 84.65 1.46 | 87.22 1.59 | 64.32 | 0.44 |
Online Continual Learning
Online continual learning adapts models to sequential data streams while preserving useful knowledge and limiting forgetting.
See all 106 papers