Intrinsic Interaction Geometry Controls the Low-Rank Complexity of Softmax Attention

How much matrix rank is required to preserve every bounded value output of normalized softmax attention? We study the unrestricted maximum-row-$\ell_1$ approximation rank $r_\varepsilon(A)$, exactly the least rank achieving uniform error over all bounded vector-valued values. Row softmax exposes the intrinsic interaction $C=P_m(\log A)P_N$, whereas invertible $Q/K$ gauges leave $A$ fixed while changing the Euclidean geometry of a chosen query/key factorization. We replace that coordinate-dependent description by a projective residual $q(C-T)$ and an attained factor-radius size $κ(T)$. For every rank-$r$ retained interaction with $τ(T)<\varepsilon$, we prove $r_\varepsilon(A)\le \min\left\{ N,\; C_r\left( 1+\frac{κ(T)} {(\varepsilon-τ(T))^2} \right)^{r/2} \right\},$ with the same unknown dimension constant as the underlying weighted Gibbs-row cover. The profile is gauge invariant, termwise no worse than native retained-subspace bounds at the same declared dimension, and has a worst-case sharp $r/2$ size exponent at fixed $r$ and $\varepsilon$. We then measure $r_\varepsilon(A)$ directly on learned attention using 9,978 certified brackets across BERT, GPT-2, Qwen2.5, and two ViT checkpoints; where certificates do not close, the optimum remains interval-valued. A pre-specified 2,302-cell held-out study further shows that the historical native-coordinate geometry block contains coarse, mostly head-level information but no detectable incremental information beyond a strong calibrated baseline. The new intrinsic descriptor is not evaluated in that study. Together, the theory and measurements distinguish an operator-intrinsic complexity control from a stronger empirical explanation that the learned-head evidence does not support.