RoboPhys-3D: A Comprehensive Embodied World Model Evaluation via 3D Reconstruction

Recent advances in large-scale video world models have enabled increasingly realistic future prediction, raising the prospect of using generated videos as scalable supervision for robot learning. However, for embodied manipulation, perceptual realism alone is not sufficient: generated interactions must also be physically consistent and executable by robotic agents. Existing benchmarks provide valuable assessments of visual quality and physical plausibility, but they do not systematically evaluate whether predicted behaviors can be translated into executable actions that complete manipulation tasks. We introduce RoboWM-Bench, a manipulation-centric benchmark for embodiment-grounded evaluation of video world models. RoboWM-Bench converts generated human-hand and robotic manipulation videos into embodied action sequences and validates them through execution in physically grounded simulation environments. Built on real-to-sim scene reconstruction and diverse manipulation tasks, RoboWM-Bench enables standardized, reproducible, and scalable evaluation of physical executability. Using RoboWM-Bench, we evaluate state-of-the-art video world models and observe that visual plausibility and embodied executability are not always aligned. Our analysis highlights several recurring factors that affect execution performance, including spatial reasoning, contact prediction, and non-physical geometric distortions, particularly in complex and long-horizon interactions. These findings provide a more fine-grained view of current model capabilities and underscore the value of embodiment-aware evaluation for guiding physically grounded world modeling in robotic manipulation.

Embodied world models predict the outcomes of robot actions to support learning and planning. For robots equipped with head and wrist cameras, this requires complementary views: the head view captures the overall task, while wrist views reveal local gripper-object interactions. However, evaluating these views independently cannot determine whether they describe the same action and object state. We introduce TRIWORLDBENCH, a benchmark for evaluating embodied world models through synchronized head, left-wrist, and right-wrist videos. It contains 500 episodes across 50 bimanual manipulation tasks and uses 19 metrics to assess tri-view consistency, task alignment, physical and 3D coherence, motion quality, temporal consistency, and visual quality. By combining cross-view checks with measurements tailored to each camera, the benchmark evaluates whether plausible individual videos also form a consistent prediction of the intended task. We summarize overall performance with TWB-Score and retain per-view results to identify where predictions fail. This extends world-model evaluation beyond single-view visual quality. Code, data, and metric definitions are available at https://github.com/TriWorldBench/TriWorldBench.

Video world models (VWMs) are rapidly emerging as scalable neural simulators for robotic manipulation. However, most benchmarks only evaluate them as open-world video generators, using Vision-Language Models (VLMs) that lack strict 3D spatial and kinematic reasoning. To bridge this gap, we introduce RoboWorM, a comprehensive, deployment-aware benchmark that leverages known hardware priors such as robot kinematic trees and fixed camera configurations, to systematically examine structural and spatiotemporal fidelity. RoboWorM curates 1,605 episodes across single-arm, bimanual, and humanoid morphologies, spanning both Markovian and long-horizon non-Markovian tasks under single- and multi-view setups. To explicitly measure physical consistency, we propose two deterministic, VLM-free metrics: KIVA for intra-view kinematic stability, and RIGIS for multi-view geometric consistency. By exploiting intrinsic robotic invariants, KIVA improves hallucination detection alignment with human annotations by 25.8% relative to the strongest frontier VLMs, while RIGIS achieves a 130% higher Spearman correlation with human preferences. Furthermore, since real-world deployment requires low inference latency, we utilize RoboWorM to conduct the first large-scale audit of the quality-efficiency trade-off. Evaluating 9 state-of-the-art acceleration techniques across 3 leading world models (over 29,000 generated rollouts), we demonstrate how these acceleration methods can retain superficial visual quality while silently compromising deployment-critical physical constraints. Using our metrics, we achieve 2.3$\times$ maximum inference speed-up with minimal quality loss.