Error Detection for PET/CT Radiology Reports: Domain-Specific vs Large Language Models
Authors: Hermione Warr, Harry Anthony, Lilli J Freischem, Yasin Ibrahim, Daniel R McGowan, Konstantinos Kamnitsas
Organizations: Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK · Department of Physics, University of Oxford, UK · Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, UK · Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Oxford University Hospitals NHS, UK
Errors in radiology reports can adversely affect patient treatment, yet automated report quality assurance remains challenging because errors are often subtle and require domain expertise to detect. Although large language models (LLMs) have recently been proposed for radiology report verification, their ability to detect clinically meaningful errors beyond chest X-ray datasets remains under-explored. To this end, we present the first systematic evaluation of language models for PET/CT report error detection, comparing compact domain-specific models with SOTA open-weight LLMs. We collected 30,633 oncology FDG PET/CT reports from 23 radiologists over 10 years. We trained domain-specific BERT models to detect clinically motivated synthetic reporting errors and evaluated alongside zero-/few-shot Qwen3-32B, Gemma-3-27B and Llama-3.3-70B on a held-out benchmark of 11,500 reports. A 15M-parameter model achieved 94.4% balanced accuracy with a 5.8% false-positive rate, compared with 84.0% for the strongest prompted LLM. Task-specific adaptation of Llama-3.3-70B closed this performance gap (94.4%) but retained substantially greater computational requirements. Our results suggest that domain-specific training matters more than model scale for PET/CT report error detection, supporting compact models as an accurate and computationally efficient approach to automated radiology report quality assurance.
Accurate lesion segmentation in PET/CT is critical for oncology, yet remains challenging because physiologic tracer uptake and artifacts can mimic malignant signal. We present RADIANT-PET, a reasoning-augmented framework that couples a high-sensitivity voxel-level segmentation model with lesion-level large language model (LLM) adjudication. Candidate uptake regions are generated with a deliberately permissive segmentation stage, then converted into structured textual descriptions that summarize uptake intensity, morphology, and regional and global anatomical context. An LLM classifies each candidate as true lesion vs. false positive, optionally leveraging the radiology report as additional clinical context. To strengthen lesion-level reasoning, we further optimize a local LLM via reinforcement learning using Group Relative Policy Optimization, rewarding correct lesion classification and anatomically concordant site assignment. Across AutoPET and an OSU test cohort, RADIANT-PET consistently outperforms strong image-only baselines, with the largest improvements observed when radiology reports are provided. Overall, these results demonstrate that LLM-based lesion-level reasoning adds a novel reasoning layer beyond conventional segmentation, suppressing physiologic false positives and aligning voxel-level predictions with clinical interpretation. The project repository is available at: https://github.com/jwang-580/RADIANT-PET.
Reliable evaluation of generated radiology reports requires strict clinical accuracy, as omitted critical findings or mischaracterized radiographic observations can directly affect patient care. Existing metrics obscure this requirement by reducing report quality to a medically ungrounded scalar. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) possess rich medical knowledge, they likewise struggle to draw a reliable boundary between clinically significant errors and harmless variation. We study this boundary using ReEvalMed benchmark as testbed and evaluate metric-level clinical significance from detecting true clinical errors ("Discrimination") and tolerating insignificant variations ("Robustness"). Across 8 LLM evaluators under one-pass and two-pass settings, we identify a widespread discrimination bias: models effectively detect errors but also over-penalize harmless rephrasings. To mitigate this, we synthesize 4k report pairs and train lightweight interpretable metrics on Qwen3-8B and MedGemma-4B. Our trained metric sharpens the clinical significance boundary, surpassing 32B-scale medical LLMs and remaining competitive with proprietary models. Crucially, the more costly two-pass setting fails to consistently improve overall performance and mainly trades discrimination for robustness. These findings suggest one-pass trained metrics as the practical choice for cost-sensitive deployment, with two-pass inference reserved for settings where D-R balance is critical. We will release the dataset and metric.
Automated medical report generation for 3D PET/CT imaging is fundamentally challenged by the high-dimensional nature of volumetric data and a critical scarcity of annotated datasets, particularly for low-resource languages. Current black-box methods map whole volumes to reports, ignoring the clinical workflow of analyzing localized Regions of Interest (RoIs) to derive diagnostic conclusions. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing VietPET-RoI, the first large-scale 3D PET/CT dataset with fine-grained RoI annotation for a low-resource language, comprising 600 PET/CT samples and 1,960 manually annotated RoIs, paired with corresponding clinical reports. Furthermore, to demonstrate the utility of this dataset, we propose HiRRA, a novel framework that mimics the professional radiologist diagnostic workflow by employing graph-based relational modules to capture dependencies between RoI attributes. This approach shifts from global pattern matching toward localized clinical findings. Additionally, we introduce new clinical evaluation metrics, namely RoI Coverage and RoI Quality Index, that measure both RoI localization accuracy and attribute description fidelity using LLM-based extraction. Extensive evaluation demonstrates that our framework achieves SOTA performance, surpassing existing models by 19.7% in BLEU and 4.7% in ROUGE-L, while achieving a remarkable 45.8% improvement in clinical metrics, indicating enhanced clinical reliability and reduced hallucination. Our code and dataset are available on GitHub.