Tail-Replay: Escaping the Curse of Linear Attention in Prefix Caching for Hybrid LLMs

Yirui Liu; Ruoling Qi; Xuaner Wu; Penghang Liu; Jian Chen

cs.LGAug 31, 2026

Tail-Replay: Escaping the Curse of Linear Attention in Prefix Caching for Hybrid LLMs

Authors: Yirui Liu, Ruoling Qi, Xuaner Wu, Penghang Liu, Jian Chen

Organizations: Institute of Artificial Intelligence, China Telecom (TeleAI) · Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Abstract

Hybrid large language models interleave full-attention layers with linear-attention layers to reduce the cost of long-context inference. This structure complicates prefix caching: full-attention key-value caches are token-addressable, whereas linear-attention layers maintain recurrent states that cannot be rolled back to arbitrary prefix boundaries. Existing hybrid prefix caching methods address this mismatch by storing recurrent-state checkpoints. As a result, token-level matches are directly usable only at positions aligned with stored checkpoints, constraining prefix reuse to a discrete set of boundaries. We present Tail-Replay, a prefix caching mechanism that enables unconstrained token-level prefix reuse in hybrid large language models. The key insight is that linear-attention mechanisms such as Gated DeltaNet can be viewed as a structured, lossy compression of the input prefix: gated recurrent updates progressively attenuate the contributions of earlier inputs. Consequently, the recurrent state of a matched prefix can be well approximated by replaying only a short, recent suffix of that prefix. Tail-Replay exploits this property by caching the exact full-attention key-value cache while omitting recurrent-state checkpoints. On a cache hit, it reconstructs the linear-attention states by replaying a short, recent suffix of the matched prefix. As a result, the reuse boundary is determined by the shared tokens rather than by recurrent-state checkpoints. We evaluate Tail-Replay on three Gated DeltaNet-based hybrid models using the LongBench and RULER benchmarks. With only a 5--10% replay budget, it retains 92.8--99.9% of full-prefill quality on LongBench and RULER. For serving efficiency, we evaluate time-to-first-token speedups across multiple matched-prefix lengths---8K, 16K, and 32K. The speedup grows with prefix length, reaching $9.1$ -- $14.3\times$ over full prefill at 32K.

Explore similar work

Apr 17, 2026cs.LG

Sparse Prefix Caching for Hybrid and Recurrent LLM Serving

Prefix caching is a key latency optimization for autoregressive LLM serving, yet existing systems assume dense per-token key/value reuse. State-space models change the structure of the problem: a recurrent layer can resume from a single stored state rather than requiring the entire token history. This asymmetry opens a new design point between no reuse and dense caching: store exact recurrent states at a sparse set of checkpoint positions and, on a cache hit, resume from the deepest stored checkpoint and recompute the remaining suffix exactly. We formalize sparse prefix caching as checkpoint placement under a distribution over overlap depths, yielding an exact O(NM) dynamic program. For use cases where requests share a non-trivial prefix (e.g. asking different questions about a single long document), we show that our method consistently improves the Pareto frontier traced by standard heuristics on real-world data. Across QuALITY and System Prompts, distribution-aware placement dominates every fixed-budget baseline on the measured layer-group Pareto frontier and matches or outperforms the strongest heuristic (block caching) while typically using substantially fewer checkpoints, with the largest gains at low checkpoint budgets where the overlap distribution is most non-uniform. The method is most relevant when many requests share a substantial but not identical prefix within a retained cache entry. It preserves exact outputs, does not change the recurrent computation itself or require new recurrent update kernels, applies to recurrent/SSM layers whose hidden state can be extracted and restored exactly, and for hybrid models can be combined with existing KV-cache compression techniques.

Mikhail Shirokikh, Sergey Nikolenko

Cache Large Language Model Serving Hybrid

Ask PDF

Jul 31, 2026cs.AI

LinearKV: One Cached State Suffices for Position-Independent Caching in Hybrid LLMs

LLM serving is increasingly accelerated by position-independent caching (PIC). Existing PIC methods, however, are built for full-attention models, where a token-indexed KV cache underlies its core operations: matching reusable token chunks, concatenating their KV entries, and selectively recomputing a few tokens to restore cross-chunk context. Hybrid LLMs break these primitives---they replace most attention layers with linear recurrences that expose only a fixed-size state, leaving no token-indexed KV to concatenate or to locally repair. This raises a natural question: can PIC benefit hybrid models, and what would it take? We present LinearKV, a training-free hybrid-PIC framework. Its key insight is a \emph{decoupled initialization}: each linear layer maps its

K

matched local states to a single initial state, while full-attention layers concatenate their KV as before. LinearKV is therefore compatible with existing PIC methods, reusing their token selection and recomputation as-is. Under this framework, we find that a \emph{single cached state} suffices as the linear layer's initializer. The algebraically principled alternative---composing all

K

cached states into the exact full-prefix state, as concurrent work HYPIC does---is unnecessary and, on some architectures, even harmful. We compare the two across three hybrid models and three PIC selectors. On the two GDN models the two tie, both recovering most of full quality (up to

92\%

); on the Mamba-2 model, exact composition instead collapses under every selector---under EPIC, for instance, it recovers only

46.6\%

of full quality, versus

86.8\%

for a single cached block initializer. A single state initializer is also cheaper, cutting time-to-first-token to

0.46\times

full prefill versus a further

5

17\%

overhead for exact composition; results hold across LongBench QA and RULER at 8K--32K.

Yirui Liu, Ruoling Qi, Longwen Wang +5

Quadratic Attention Cache Key-Value Cache Graphics Processing Unit Memory

Ask PDF

Jul 8, 2025cs.CL

A Systematic Analysis of Hybrid Linear Attention

Transformers face quadratic complexity and memory issues with long sequences, prompting the adoption of linear attention mechanisms using fixed-size hidden states. However, linear models often suffer from limited recall performance, leading to hybrid architectures that combine linear and full attention layers. Despite extensive hybrid architecture research, the choice of linear attention component has not been deeply explored. We systematically evaluate various linear attention models across generations - vector recurrences to advanced gating mechanisms - both standalone and hybridized. To enable this comprehensive analysis, we trained and open-sourced 72 models: 36 at 340M parameters (20B tokens) and 36 at 1.3B parameters (100B tokens), covering six linear attention variants across five hybridization ratios. Benchmarking on standard language modeling and recall tasks reveals that superior standalone linear models do not necessarily excel in hybrids. While language modeling remains stable across linear-to-full attention ratios, recall significantly improves with increased full attention layers, particularly below a 3:1 ratio. Our study highlights selective gating, hierarchical recurrence, and controlled forgetting as critical for effective hybrid models. We recommend architectures such as HGRN-2 or GatedDeltaNet with a linear-to-full ratio between 3:1 and 6:1 to achieve Transformer-level recall efficiently. Our models are open-sourced at https://huggingface.co/collections/m-a-p/hybrid-linear-attention-research-686c488a63d609d2f20e2b1e.

Dustin Wang, Rui-Jie Zhu, Steven Abreu +9

Global Attention Mechanism Systematic Study

Ask PDF