cs.AIAug 31, 2026

Scaffolding Foundation Models into Physical-World Agents Pushes the Frontier of Long-Horizon Navigation

Authors: Zixing Lei, Gengze Zhou, Xiong-Hui Chen, Jiazhao Zhang, Yiyang Huang, Hang Yin, Haoqi Yuan, Qi Wu, +2 more

Organizations: Shanghai Jiao Tong University · AIML, Adelaide University · Qwen Team, Alibaba Inc · Peking University · Tsinghua University · Zhongguancun Academy

Abstract

Long-horizon physical-world agents must reason over distant goals while grounding decisions in reliable closed-loop behavior. Today's foundation models split these capabilities: vision-language models (VLMs) infer missing information and adapt high-level plans but remain brittle and inefficient at repeated navigation grounding, while navigation foundation models (NFMs) robustly execute semantic goals but operate as bounded episodes without persistent task-level reasoning. We introduce NavMCP, an agentic scaffolding framework that couples a VLM reasoning agent with an NFM executor for long-horizon exploration. The VLM decides what evidence to seek, where to search, and when to stop, while the NFM grounds each semantic sub-goal into closed-loop navigation. Three channels structure their collaboration: intent translates evidence needs into navigation calls, observation converts rollouts into source-grounded trajectory evidence, and memory accumulates findings, negative evidence, and unresolved goals across calls. This design turns isolated navigation rollouts into persistent embodied interaction without retraining either model. On Embodied Question Answering, NavMCP achieves state-of-the-art results on HM-EQA, MT-HM3D, and EXPRESS-Bench. Under matched agent and executor backbones, it outperforms an episodic interface by 14.9 percentage points on HM-EQA. On a Unitree Go2, NavMCP reaches 78.3% success, with its margin over the strongest baseline growing from 10 to 45 points as the task horizon increases. These results demonstrate the potential of scaffolding complementary foundation models into long-horizon physical-world agents.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Feb 12, 2026cs.RO

LongNav-R1: Horizon-Adaptive Multi-Turn RL for Long-Horizon VLA Navigation

This paper develops LongNav-R1, an end-to-end multi-turn reinforcement learning (RL) framework designed to optimize Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models for long-horizon navigation. Unlike existing single-turn paradigm, LongNav-R1 reformulates the navigation decision process as a continuous multi-turn conversation between the VLA policy and the embodied environment. This multi-turn RL framework offers two distinct advantages: i) it enables the agent to reason about the causal effects of historical interactions and sequential future outcomes; and ii) it allows the model to learn directly from online interactions, fostering diverse trajectory generation and avoiding the behavioral rigidity often imposed by human demonstrations. Furthermore, we introduce Horizon-Adaptive Policy Optimization. This mechanism explicitly accounts for varying horizon lengths during advantage estimation, facilitating accurate temporal credit assignment over extended sequences. Consequently, the agent develops diverse navigation behaviors and resists collapse during long-horizon tasks. Experiments on object navigation benchmarks validate the framework's efficacy: With 4,000 rollout trajectories, LongNav-R1 boosts the Qwen3-VL-2B success rate from 64.3% to 73.0%. These results demonstrate superior sample efficiency and significantly outperform state-of-the-art methods. The model's generalizability and robustness are further validated by its zero-shot performance in long-horizon real-world navigation settings. All source code is open-sourced at https://github.com/UMich-CURLY/LongNav-R1.
Yue Hu, Avery Xi, Qixin Xiao +4
Vision-And-Language Navigation
AskPDF
Feb 20, 2025cs.RO

Mem2Ego: Empowering Vision-Language Models with Global-to-Ego Memory for Long-Horizon Embodied Navigation

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have made them powerful tools in embodied navigation, enabling agents to leverage commonsense and spatial reasoning for efficient exploration in unfamiliar environments. Existing LLM-based approaches convert global memory, such as semantic or topological maps, into language descriptions to guide navigation. While this improves efficiency and reduces redundant exploration, the loss of geometric information in language-based representations hinders spatial reasoning, especially in intricate environments. To address this, VLM-based approaches directly process ego-centric visual inputs to select optimal directions for exploration. However, relying solely on a first-person perspective makes navigation a partially observed decision-making problem, leading to suboptimal decisions in complex environments. In this paper, we present a novel vision-language model (VLM)-based navigation framework that addresses these challenges by adaptively retrieving task-relevant cues from a global memory module and integrating them with the agent's egocentric observations. By dynamically aligning global contextual information with local perception, our approach enhances spatial reasoning and decision-making in long-horizon tasks. The proposed method surpasses previous state-of-the-art approaches by a significant margin on both the HSSD and HM3D benchmarks and demonstrates strong performance on a real robot.
Lingfeng Zhang, Yuecheng Liu, Zhanguang Zhang +19
Vision-And-Language NavigationSpatial MemoryEgocentric Vision
AskPDF
Sep 14, 2026cs.RO

C^2Nav: Compare Before You Commit for Zero-Shot Vision-and-Language Navigation

Zero-shot vision-and-language navigation in continuous environments (VLN-CE) increasingly places foundation vision-language models (VLMs) inside the navigation loop. Existing systems commonly request cardinal outputs such as waypoints, pixels, headings, progress values, or absolute arrival decisions, coupling a generative response to geometric magnitude or an irreversible commitment. We study a complementary model-robot interface: the VLM compares controller-constructed alternatives, while geometry, thresholds, action magnitude, and execution remain on the physical side. We instantiate this idea in C2Nav, a training-free framework with three coordinated faculties. Seeing performs ordinal Gaze Election over physically vetted candidate views; Remembering maintains a compact route sketch and compares adjacent instruction-leg hypotheses; and Arriving combines a hesitation ladder, look-back comparison, and revocable walk-back for reliable stopping. On the public OpenNav R2R-CE 100 protocol, C2Nav with Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct obtains 41.0% OSR, 31.0% SR, and 16.7% SPL, while the same interface with the standard GPT-5.5 model reaches 54.0% OSR, 44.0% SR, and 29.0% SPL. Whole-faculty ablations reduce SR to 14.0% without Seeing, 25.0% without Remembering, and 29.0% without Arriving. Matched role inversions that replace only the comparative answer form with cardinal/absolute questions reduce SR to 12.0%, 28.0%, and 21.0% in the spatial, transition, and terminal slots, respectively. The results indicate that a constrained decision interface and stronger VLM reasoning are complementary rather than interchangeable.
Runtian Zheng, Congpeng Zhang, Ying Liu
Vision-And-Language NavigationTrajectory-Level Credit Assignment
AskPDF