Linguistic Distance Segregates Latent Representations in Automatic Speech Recognition Systems

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems and audio language models (audio LMs) now report low error rates on monolingual benchmarks, but their behavior on code switched speech in low resource, diacritic rich languages remains poorly characterized. We present a switch aware evaluation of eleven modern systems (six ASR models and five audio LMs) on English Yoruba code-switched speech, using a deterministic 2000 utterance evaluation set and a shared scoring pipeline. Beyond word error rate (WER), we report switch localized diagnostics: a switch entry token error rate (SETER), windowed switch point error rates, language specific error rates, and a diacritic insensitive WER. Our central finding is that aggregate WER hides code switching behavior. The best system by WER (an ASR model) is statistically indistinguishable from a leading audio LM on WER, yet the audio LM is significantly better on every switch localized metric. Across faithful systems, Yoruba token recognition collapses (error 0.97 for almost all systems) while English tokens are recognized far better, and errors concentrate sharply at switches into Yoruba. Several generative audio LMs fail as exact transcribers, producing translation, verbosity, and prompt leakage that are strongly prompt dependent. We release manifests, metric implementations, and evaluation scripts to support reproducible, switch aware benchmarking for African code switched speech.

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is traditionally evaluated using Word Error Rate (WER), a metric that is insensitive to meaning. Embedding-based semantic metrics are better correlated with human perception, but decoder-based Large Language Models (LLMs) remain underexplored for this task. This paper evaluates their relevance through three approaches: (1) selecting the best hypothesis between two candidates, (2) computing semantic distance using generative embeddings, and (3) qualitative classification of errors. On the HATS dataset, the best LLMs achieve 92--94% agreement with human annotators for hypothesis selection, compared to 63% for WER, also outperforming semantic metrics. Embeddings from decoder-based LLMs show performance comparable to encoder models. Finally, LLMs offer a promising direction for interpretable and semantic ASR evaluation.

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance degrades sharply on dysarthric speech, yet how disordered articulation reshapes a model's internal representations is underexplored. We present a layer-wise probing analysis of a transformer ASR encoder on Mandarin dysarthric speech under three transcript-matched conditions: original dysarthric speech, speaker conditioned zero-shot TTS resynthesis, and unconditioned TTS. The probes reveal a task-dependent hierarchy: phoneme boundary information stays weak for dysarthric speech at every layer, phoneme identity becomes recoverable toward the upper layers, and recognition difficulty is encoded in the deepest layers. Tone-sensitive evaluation shows Mandarin lexical tone is a persistent error source. Cross-condition similarity divergence grows with depth, indicating that disordered speech affects high-level representations more than low-level acoustic features. Guided by these findings, single-layer LoRA at layer 7 and adaptation on subset layers 5-8 achieve performance within 3.5% and 2.48% relative margins of full encoder adaptation, respectively, while upper-layer adaptation is less effective for dysarthric speech. These findings link representation analysis to parameter-efficient fine-tuning and motivate layer-aware adaptation for low-resource Mandarin dysarthric ASR.