cs.HCAug 31, 2026

Augmenting Interviewer Judgments of Patient Experience with Automatic Language Analysis

Authors: Aowen Shi, Michal Balazia, Danilo Postin, René Hurlemann, Jan Alexandersson, François Brémond, Philipp Müller

Abstract

Understanding how psychiatric patients subjectively experienced a clinical conversation is important for feedback and alliance-related process monitoring. While interviewers form post-session judgments about patient experience, these judgments do not always match patients' self-reports. Automatic approaches for predicting perceived interaction quality from conversation have been proposed, but it remains unclear whether such approaches can complement human judgment rather than simply replicate it. To address this gap, we evaluate a clinician-support framework in which post-session interviewer ratings are combined with automatic language-based predictions to estimate patient-reported interaction quality in free clinical interviews. We assess this integration across multiple standard model types, including Ridge, SVR, MLP, GRU, and BiLSTM, all trained on sentence embeddings extracted from dyadic transcripts of 107 free conversations between psychiatric patients and interviewers. Our results show that combining interviewer judgments with model predictions through simple averaging yields the strongest overall performance. The interviewer-only baseline reached a Pearson correlation of 0.365. Among fully automatic models, Ridge achieved the strongest Pearson correlation (r = 0.286), while BiLSTM achieved r = 0.270. The strongest result was obtained by BiLSTM interviewer integration (r = 0.403). Our findings suggest that automatic language analysis and interviewer judgment capture complementary aspects of patient experience and that their combination provides a more accurate approximation of the patient's own report than either source alone.

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 4, 2026cs.AI

ADAPTS: Agentic Decomposition for Automated Protocol-agnostic Tracking of Symptoms

Modeling latent clinical constructs from unconstrained clinical interactions is a unique challenge in affective computing. We present ADAPTS (Agentic Decomposition for Automated Protocol-agnostic Tracking of Symptoms), a framework for automated rating of depression and anxiety severity using a mixture-of-agents LLM architecture. This approach decomposes long-form clinical interviews into symptom-specific reasoning tasks, producing auditable justifications while preserving temporal and speaker alignment. Generalization was evaluated across two independent datasets (N=204N=204) with distinct interview structures. On high-discrepancy interviews, automated ratings approximated expert benchmarks (absolute error=22\text{absolute error}=22) more closely than original human ratings (absolute error=26\text{absolute error}=26). Implementing an ``extended'' protocol that incorporates qualitative clinical conventions significantly stabilized ratings, with absolute agreement reaching ICC(2,1)=0.877\text{ICC(2,1)} = 0.877. These findings suggest that the ADAPTS framework enables promising evaluations of psychiatric severity. While the current implementation is purely text-based, the underlying architecture is readily extensible to multimodal inputs, including acoustic and visual features. By approximating expert-level precision in a protocol-agnostic manner, this framework provides a foundation for objective and scalable psychiatric assessment, especially in resource-limited settings.
Alexandria K. Vail, Marcelo Cicconet, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn +2
DepressionMental HealthAffective ComputingCell Tracking
AskPDF
Sep 15, 2026cs.CL

DiaWhisper-DPO: Role-Attributed Transcription of Clinical Interviews via Failure-Mined Preference Optimization

Automated depression screening from clinical interviews requires attribution of utterances to the clinician or patient. We evaluate two datasets: DAIC-WOZ, where participant-only recordings require re-synthesizing both sides for controlled two-party evaluation, and PDCH-HAMD, comprising voice-converted real Chinese interviews for cross-lingual validation. Cascaded systems combine speaker diarization with role-assignment heuristics, so errors can propagate across stages. We propose an end-to-end model, which we named DiaWhisper, that fine-tunes Whisper-large-v3 with LoRA and an auxiliary frame-level role head for transcription and attribution, together with DiaWhisper-DPO, a failure-mined refinement that uses genuine decoding failures as DPO rejected completions without human preference annotation. On 29 DAIC-WOZ test sessions, DiaWhisper-DPO achieves 0.973 role accuracy and 0.119 DER, 72% below the strongest cascaded baseline, and reduces seed variation from σ = .205 to .002. Retrained on PDCH-HAMD, it achieves 0.757 role accuracy and improves all 78 session-seed pairs.
Weiming Li, Ana Catarina Fidalgo Barata, Miguel Constante +1
Speaker DiarizationSpeech Transcriptions
AskPDF
Jul 9, 2026cs.AI

MentalHospital: A Virtual Environment for Evaluating Psychiatric Clinical Encounters

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on isolated psychiatric tasks, including dialogue, diagnosis, and treatment planning, yet existing benchmarks rarely simulate complete psychiatric clinical encounters. We introduce MentalHospital\textbf{MentalHospital}, a virtual evaluation environment for LLM-based psychiatric clinical encounters. MentalHospital instantiates the Subjective Interviewing, Objective Examination, Diagnostic Assessment, and Treatment Planning (S.O.A.P.) workflow, using skill-augmented standardized patients constructed from 1,193 de-identified psychiatric electronic health record (EHR) cases spanning all major ICD-11 categories and 76 disorders. Each encounter is assessed through a dual-track protocol that combines objective comparison against EHR-derived references with subjective assessment of clinical process quality. To scale specialist judgment, we develop MentalEval\textbf{MentalEval}, five domain-specific evaluators covering communication empathy, interviewing professionalism, clinical-note quality, diagnostic rigor, and treatment appropriateness, trained with rubric-grounded SFT and expert-guided DPO. Survey responses from 22 clinicians support MentalHospital's clinical fidelity (3.88/5), while MentalEval achieves strong expert alignment with an average QWK of 0.944. Benchmarking shows that even the strongest LLM trails clinicians by 37.28 percentage points in objective psychiatric competence, with mental status assessment as a key bottleneck.
Yuming Yang, Xiao Sun, Yuanwei Zou +6
Mental HealthSimulated PatientsLarge Language Model EvaluationDiagnostic BenchmarkEnvironment
AskPDF