cs.NEAug 27, 2026

Benchmarking spiking neural networks across sensing modalities on edge devices

Authors: Xin Du, Di Yu, Changze Lv, Yuqi Zhang, Zhuo Chen, Wentao Tong, Helin Zheng, Weisong Zhang, 

Organizations: School of Software Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China · State Key Lab of Brain-Machine Intelligence, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China · College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China · School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China · 

Abstract

Edge computing systems need to support diverse sensing workloads under tight energy and memory constraints, thereby motivating deployment-aware model selection. Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are a promising alternative to conventional artificial neural networks (ANNs), yet systematic evidence for when and why they provide practical advantages remains limited. Here, we present a benchmark of SNNs across five sensing modalities and multiple edge devices, systematically evaluating spike encoding, neuron models, and network topologies under consistent training and deployment protocols. We find that SNN advantages are strongly modality-dependent: while SNNs achieve performance broadly comparable to ANNs across most workloads, wireless sensing emerges as a particularly favorable domain. Frequency-domain and feature-space analyses further explain this result by showing that spiking dynamics naturally align with the spectral-temporal structure of wireless signals. Our deployment analysis further shows that SNN advantages are not one-dimensional, with energy gains often accompanied by modality-dependent system costs. Finally, we provide an open-source framework for reproducible benchmarking and deployment profiling, offering a practical foundation for algorithm-software-hardware co-design on emerging edge and neuromorphic computing platforms.

Explore similar work

Apr 29, 2026

EdgeSpike: Spiking Neural Networks for Low-Power Autonomous Sensing in Edge IoT Architectures

We propose EdgeSpike, a co-designed spiking neural network (SNN) framework for autonomous low-power sensing in edge Internet of Things (IoT) architectures. EdgeSpike unifies (i) a hybrid surrogate-gradient and direct-encoding training pipeline, (ii) a hardware-aware neural architecture search (NAS) bounded by per-inference energy and memory budgets, (iii) an event-driven runtime targeting Intel Loihi 2, SpiNNaker 2, and commodity ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers with custom spike-sparse SIMD kernels, and (iv) a lightweight local plasticity rule enabling continual on-device adaptation without backpropagation. The framework is evaluated across five sensing tasks (keyword spotting, vibration-based machine fault detection, surface electromyography gesture recognition, 77 GHz radar human-activity classification, and structural-health acoustic-emission monitoring) on three hardware targets. EdgeSpike achieves a mean classification accuracy of 91.4%, within 1.2 percentage points (pp) of strong INT8 convolutional neural network (CNN) baselines (mean 92.6%), while reducing energy per inference by 18x to 47x on neuromorphic hardware (mean 31x) and by 4.6x to 7.9x on Cortex-M (mean 6.1x). End-to-end latency remains at or below 9.4 ms across all 15 task-hardware configurations. A seven-month, 64-node wireless field deployment confirms a 6.3x extension in projected battery lifetime (from 312 to 1978 days at 2 Wh per node) and bounded accuracy degradation under seasonal drift (0.7 pp with on-device adaptation versus 2.1 pp without). Hardware-aware NAS evaluates 8400 candidates and yields a 12-point Pareto front. EdgeSpike will be released as open source with reproducible training pipelines, hardware-portable runtimes, and benchmark suites.
May 11, 2026

Frequency Matching in Spiking Neural Networks for mmWave Sensing

Millimeter-wave (mmWave) sensing enables privacy-preserving, always-on edge perception, but its measurements are often sparse, temporally irregular, and corrupted by high-frequency noise. Existing mmWave pipelines predominantly rely on artificial neural networks (ANNs), which achieve robustness through extensive preprocessing or deep architectures, thereby limiting their efficiency on edge devices. In this work, we study spiking neural networks (SNNs) for mmWave sensing from a mechanism-data alignment perspective. By leveraging the low-pass filtering behavior of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) dynamics, we analyze how their implicit temporal filtering interacts with the frequency structure of mmWave signals. Our analysis shows that when discriminative information resides in low-to-mid frequencies, LIF dynamics can inherently suppress high-frequency noise, clarifying when and why SNNs outperform ANNs. Based on this insight, we derive a principled criterion for configuring the membrane decay factor by matching the effective bandwidth of LIF dynamics to the data's discriminative spectral content. Experimental results across four widely used mmWave datasets validate the proposed frequency-matching hypothesis, yielding an average test-accuracy improvement of 6.22% and a 3.64×\times reduction in theoretical energy consumption relative to ANN baselines, under a unified evaluation protocol.
Oct 6, 2026

Energy-Efficient Spiking Neural Networks for Sensing-Aided Beam Prediction

Sensing-aided beam prediction can reduce the beam-training overhead of millimeter-wave (mmWave) systems by leveraging environmental information from complementary modalities such as vision and position. However, the resulting sensing and inference pipeline can be energy-intensive, motivating the use of energy-efficient spiking neural networks (SNNs) as an alternative to conventional artificial neural networks (ANNs). In this work, we develop SNN architectures for beam prediction and systematically compare them with ANNs using position-only, vision-only, and multimodal inputs. Our results show that compact ANNs consistently outperform SNNs for position-only sensing. In contrast, for vision and multimodal sensing, SNNs achieve higher accuracy than ANNs at similar energy costs and require up to an order of magnitude less energy at a comparable accuracy. For example, the multimodal SNN achieves 58.08% top-1 accuracy, outperforming the closest-energy ANN by 18.11 percentage points. We further show that SNN accuracy is limited by the binary communication between layers rather than by model size. These results demonstrate the potential of SNNs for energy-efficient sensing-aided beam prediction while highlighting their accuracy limitation.