cs.CRAug 31, 2026

Workload Identification with Physical Side Channels for AI Governance

Authors: Simone GargiuloGabriel Kulp

Organizations: Pivotal Research · Intelligence Security Laboratories

Abstract

AI compute verification is one of the first tangible and tractable points for international policy aimed at AI governance. Determining whether frontier labs, or any operator, comply with agreements requires the regulating authority to discern how their compute is used. The elementary building block of AI compute is the GPU, and any activity it executes leaves a physical trace. Here, we show that an external observer can identify the class of the workload running on an NVIDIA H200 from its power draw. Unlike on-chip NVML telemetry, which can be spoofed or replayed, such a physical channel can in principle be observed independently of operator cooperation. We recorded 930930 five-second traces at 10\sim 10 MHz, covering seventeen open LLM families and twenty-five non-AI workloads. Over this corpus we separate training from inference and from non-AI computation with an accuracy of 97%97\% and a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.9550.955, evaluated on model families unseen during training. AI workload spectral content predominantly lies below 20\sim 20kHz and training is particularly recognizable through the memory-bound optimizer update. The GPU operator is then treated as adversarial and able to reshape the physical computation itself. Four evasion strategies are tested to disguise training as inference, producing an additional 680 adversarial traces. A detector hardened against evasion strategies, with the tested strategy held out, catches training 99%\geq 99\% of the time for three of the four strategies. The fourth, diluted low-rank adaptation (LoRA), is detected 4848--88%88\% of the time with a hardened classifier, rising to 98%\geq 98\% with an additional rescue rule. While these attacks are not a comprehensive evaluation against adversarial behaviour, they offer initial insights beyond genuine activities and a dataset for developing and testing stronger evasion mechanisms.

Explore similar work

Jun 17, 2026cs.LG

Detecting Hidden ML Training With Zero-Overhead Telemetry

Hardware-enabled monitoring of GPU workloads underpins many proposals for AI compute governance, but if developers can defeat monitoring mechanisms, such schemes are unworkable. We evaluate the adversarial robustness of GPU workload classification using only zero-overhead, privacy-preserving NVML telemetry: content-agnostic signals that observe physical effects of computation without accessing model weights, training data, or hyperparameters. Across 5 rounds of monitor-evader iteration, we evaluate 20 evasion strategy families on 9 GPU models spanning 4 architecture generations. We develop a classifier that achieves 98.2% binary accuracy at identifying training workloads across the whole corpus, and 43-87% accuracy against the most challenging unexpected workloads even when they are adversarially disguised.
Robi Rahman, Sabiha Tajdari
May 29, 2026cs.CR

Bit-Exact AI Inference Verification Without Performance Tradeoffs

Verifying claims about AI workloads is a prerequisite for credible AI governance of covert adversaries (who comply with monitoring only when detection likelihood is high), yet the apparent non-determinism of GPU floating-point arithmetic forces auditors to accept approximate output matches. Covert adversaries can exploit unverifiable degrees of freedom in monitored computation. Attack vectors include steganography, unreported modification of inference software, and covert computation via unreported batch elements. Empirically, we analyze how modern inference engines (vLLM, HF transformers) produce deterministic but non-invariant outputs, without needing to set performance-compromising determinism flags, if the right information is available for re-computation and no atomic functions are called in the backend. We demonstrate that such bitwise-precise re-computation does not require access to identical hardware, via a software-only emulation of LLM inference across multiple NVIDIA GPU variants. Thus, accumulated rounding errors can be an auditable signature of the software and hardware setup used for inference, instead of a constraint on verifiability.
Naci Cankaya
Jun 19, 2026cs.CR

OVIG: Optimistic Verification of AI Training Integrity via Gradient Signals

The rapid growth of AI has increased the demand for domain-specific post-training, while the cost and specialization of accelerator infrastructure push many model owners to outsource this process. Outsourced training lowers operational barriers, but creates a training-integrity gap: the owner receives a checkpoint, logs, and aggregate metrics without direct evidence that the declared training trajectory was faithfully executed. An untrusted provider may have incentives to deviate from that trajectory, either to save computation or to introduce targeted security risks. Auditing such deviations is difficult because floating-point execution on heterogeneous accelerators introduces benign numerical drift, making it hard to distinguish honest replay differences from integrity violations. Existing verification methods either observe training at too coarse a granularity or impose costs and deployment constraints that are impractical at scale. We present OVIG, an optimistic verification framework that audits outsourced post-training using an empirical boundary on gradient differences calibrated from honest heterogeneous replays. OVIG checks opened intervals against this boundary and combines optimistic sampling with a stride parameter ss, which partitions training into stride-aligned intervals and retains only interval-endpoint evidence. Across shortcut training attacks and targeted manipulation attacks, OVIG maintains 0%0\% ASR on language, vision, and diffusion workloads. On Qwen3, increasing the stride from s=1s=1 to s=2000s=2000 reduces off-chain storage and evidence transmission by 1996×1996\times while preserving 0%0\% ASR; at this setting, OVIG incurs only 1.143×1.143\times total system overhead relative to training without verification. These results show that OVIG provides a practical integrity layer for outsourced AI post-training under heterogeneous execution.
Hongxu Su, Jianzhu Yao, Huan Zhang +2