SpecMind: Enabling Spectrum Intelligence via Multi-Agent Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation

[Abridged] - Spectral Retrieval is a plug-in re-ranking stage that interpolates between per-token MaxSim and mean-pool retrieval through a multi-scale sinc convolution over token embeddings. In standard dense retrieval each document is one mean-pooled vector; when relevance localises into a short subspan, the signal averages into noise. Spectral Retrieval reuses per-token embeddings from a late-interaction index and convolves them with a normalised sinc kernel at multiple scales. At L=1 the kernel acts as the identity, recovering per-token MaxSim; as L grows it approaches a uniform filter, recovering mean pooling. The maximum cosine over positions and scales yields a score provably no less informative than either endpoint. On a controlled synthetic benchmark with 1,000 documents and planted single-position spikes, mean-pool retrieval sits at chance (Recall@10 ~ 0.02) regardless of spike strength, while Spectral Retrieval reaches Recall@10 = 1.0 once the planted cosine exceeds the corpus-level token noise floor. On LIMIT-small with a frozen all-mpnet-base-v2 encoder, Spectral Retrieval lifts Recall@10 from 0.33 to 0.90, MRR from 0.22 to 0.79, and strict Success@10 from 0.12 to 0.84, without retraining. The method fits naturally into multi-agent LLM systems, where each agent benefits from a tighter, role-specific retrieval window over a shared corpus.

Retrieval-augmented agents are increasingly the interface to large knowledge bases, yet most treat retrieval as a black box: they issue exploratory queries, inspect snippets, and reformulate until evidence emerges. This resembles how a newcomer searches an unfamiliar database rather than how an expert navigates it with strong priors about terminology and likely evidence, causing extra retrieval rounds, latency, and poor recall. We introduce \textit{Superintelligent Retrieval Agent} (SIRA), which casts \emph{superintelligence} in retrieval as compressing multi-round exploratory search into a single corpus-discriminative retrieval action. SIRA does not merely ask which terms are relevant; it asks which terms separate the desired evidence from corpus-level confusers. Offline, an LLM enriches each document with missing search vocabulary; at query time, it predicts evidence vocabulary the query omits; and corpus statistics serve as tool calls that filter terms that are absent, overly common, or unlikely to create retrieval margin. The final step is a single weighted BM25 call combining the query with the validated expansion. Across ten BEIR benchmarks, SIRA achieves the strongest average retrieval performance in our comparison, beating dense retrievers, learned sparse retrievers, and LLM search-agent baselines while using no relevance labels or retriever fine-tuning. On downstream QA, its retrieval-only answer coverage exceeds recent RL-trained agentic QA systems on NQ and HotpotQA. We also introduce \textbf{BrowseComp-Wikipedia}, a hard-search benchmark of 232 BrowseComp-derived queries over a 25,587,229-document Wikipedia index. Even without index-time enrichment, using only grounded Wikipedia categories, SIRA outperforms multi-round Perplexity agents at every budget, reaching 9.70% Recall@1, 15.27% Recall@10, and 36.14% Recall@100.

Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) extends static RAG by allowing language models to iteratively reason, generate search queries, retrieve evidence, and predict answers. However, it remains challenging for models to decide when to retrieve, whether to use lexical matching or semantic similarity, and how to control context granularity to prevent irrelevant tokens from interfering with agent reasoning. In this paper, we introduce GRASP, a reinforcement learning (RL) framework for training agents to adaptively coordinate complementary retrieval tools during multi-step reasoning. GRASP provides the agent with semantic search, keyword search, and paragraph-reading actions, enabling it to retrieve sentence-level evidence and expand further context only when needed. We train the policy with a reward that jointly accounts for answer accuracy, grounded reading, complementary search, and turn efficiency. Experiments on multi-hop reasoning benchmarks show that GRASP improves both retrieval recall and downstream question answering performance compared with single-step retrieval, prompting-based agentic RAG, and RL-based retrieval baselines. Qualitative and ablation analyses show that the learned policy develops interpretable skimming and scanning behavior: it uses semantic search for broad exploration, paragraph reading for local verification, and keyword search for entity-specific evidence. These results suggest that learning to coordinate retrieval signals and context granularity is critical for agent's correct reasoning.