Accurate prediction of unsteady separated flows is challenging because the aerodynamic loads depend on nonlinear separation and vortex-shedding dynamics. Although high-fidelity CFD resolves these mechanisms, its cost limits repeated use in design and control. Standard field-level surrogate training, however, does not distinguish the flow regions that contribute most strongly to the aerodynamic loads. We introduce VATO (Vortex-Force-Aware Transformer Operator), which couples the Vortex Force Map (VFM) method to a geometry-aware neural operator through two complementary mechanisms. VATO-S adds training-only supervision of the local VFM force-contribution field, with no increase in model size or inference cost. VATO-A uses VFM contribution and sensitivity fields to prioritise force-relevant source locations for residual cross attention. The methods are evaluated on unsteady CFD data for double-edged-plate aerofoils over 54 trajectories from nine geometries. Over lead times of 1-20~ms, VATO-S reduces velocity, pressure, and vorticity errors by 10.4%, 1.0%, and 15.6%, respectively, while VATO-A achieves reductions of 15.8%, 7.5%, and 31.2%. VATO-S gives the lowest VFM-derived drag error, whereas VATO-A gives the lowest pressure-derived lift and drag errors. Over lead times extending 50% beyond the training range, VATO-A retains a 26.9% reduction in vorticity error and larger improvements in all four force readouts, despite reduced gains in velocity and pressure. These results show that force-aware operator learning can improve both flow-field prediction and aerodynamic functional accuracy in unsteady separated flows.
Transformer surrogates for 3D flow prediction compress an industrial mesh into a small set of tokens from which every prediction point reads. Two operations follow: the retrieval step in which a point gathers information from the compressed representation, and the feed-forward layer that transforms what it retrieved. In current backbones both are blind to where the point sits in the flow. We condition both on wall-related physical signals. Distance-aware cross-attention (DA-CA) reshapes each volume query by its wall distance before retrieval, so that a point deep in the boundary layer draws different geometric information than one in the outer flow. Surface-volume mixture-of-experts (SVMoE) replaces the shared feed-forward layer with a small set of experts, routed by wall distance for volume points and by local geometry for surface points. Neither mechanism is tied to one architecture, so we apply both unchanged to AB-UPT and Transolver-3. On DrivAerML with 50 training cases, DA-CA reduces the volume pressure error by 10.1%, and DA-CA and SVMoE together reduce it by 12.5%; DA-CA improves the near-wall region at some cost in the far region, which SVMoE recovers, and the volume experts settle into near-wall, transition, and free-stream bands without routing supervision. Retrained on 300 cases, the conditioning improves every field quantity, reducing volume pressure and velocity errors by 33.1% and 18.6% on AB-UPT and by 21.4% and 21.3% on Transolver-3. Under Leave-One-Body-Out evaluation on DrivAerNet++, it reduces the volume pressure error on unseen body types by up to 14.2%.
Physics-informed surrogate models can accelerate computational fluid dynamics simulations. However, many existing methods reproduce global flow patterns more reliably than localized multiscale structures. This study presents a physics-informed Fourier-wavelet transformer for next-step velocity-field reconstruction in real-world flow benchmarks. The proposed formulation combines hybrid Fourier-wavelet spectral encoding with physics-biased self-attention based on partial differential equation residual diagnostics. It also uses self-supervised pretraining through Masked Physics Prediction and Equation Consistency Prediction. The experiments are conducted on two real benchmark cases: cylinder-wake flow and fluid-structure interaction. All approaches are evaluated under a shared local protocol and compared with spectral, transformer-based, operator-learning, and physics-informed neural-network baselines. On the cylinder-wake benchmark, the proposed model achieves the best aggregate accuracy, with an all-channel normalized mean-squared error of 0.05875 and an all-channel Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.97019. On the fluid-structure-interaction benchmark, it gives the lowest all-channel normalized mean-squared error of 2.70×10−4, compared with 4.02×10−4 for the strongest baseline. Component-wise field comparisons and scale-separated diagnostics further show stronger recovery of localized wake structures, including near-body, wake-core, and far-wake features. The results demonstrate improved real-world flow reconstruction while maintaining a practical accuracy-cost tradeoff.
High-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is crucial to vehicle aerodynamic analysis, but its cost still constrains early-stage design exploration. Machine-learning-based surface-field prediction offers a faster alternative if the model can efficiently capture both global flow context and local geometric detail. This work proposes a machine-learning-based method, named the geometry-aware triplane field network (GTF-Net), for vehicle aerodynamic pressure and wall shear stress prediction. GTF-Net constructs triplane features directly from sampled surface points through a shared multilayer perceptron (MLP) and smooth bilinear rasterization. The planes are then processed by a dual-stream backbone that combines adaptive Fourier neural operator (AFNO) spectral mixing with convolutional neural network (CNN) refinement, so long-range aerodynamic coupling and local geometry-induced variations are modeled in the same representation. At query stage, sampled triplane features are combined with vehicle-aligned directional coordinates, normal-projection features, and a voxel-based curvature proxy. GTF-Net is compared with Transolver, geometry-informed neural operator (GINO), and TripNet, a triplane-based surrogate model. GTF-Net improves the relative L2 error from the strongest baseline value of 0.157 to 0.145 for pressure prediction and from 0.237 to 0.226 for wall shear stress prediction. Ablation results show that AFNO mixing, local CNN refinement, and query-side geometric encoding each contribute to accuracy, supporting the proposed mechanism of combining structured triplane representation with explicit aerodynamic geometry cues.