Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Automated Pathology Diagnosis and Report Generation

Generating clinically useful pathology reports for pathology cases from whole-slide images (WSIs) is challenging due to gigapixel resolution, long visual-token sequences, and the complexity of case-level reasoning, where a single case may contain multiple WSIs with heterogeneous tissues and ambiguous findings. We present a simple token-efficient vision--language model for case-level synoptic report generation that remains practical under constrained GPU memory. Our architecture follows a minimal three-component design: a frozen pathology patch encoder, a lightweight two-layer MLP vision-language aligner, and a large language model decoder, with an explicit WSI marker token to separate slides within a case. Training proceeds in two supervised stages: (1) aligner-only WSI captioning using heterogeneous WSI-text pairs, and (2) case-level supervised fine-tuning on case-report pairs for structured report generation. To reduce sequence length, we represent each slide using $512 \times 512$ patches at $5\times$ magnification, which reduces the average sequence length by up to $64\times$ times compared to the commonly used $20\times$ patches. Combined with efficient training techniques, we enable practical training with only half a NVIDIA H100 GPU. Across both training stages, our approach achieves high ROUGE-L/METEOR/BLEU-4 scores while being substantially more efficient in memory and runtime. In AI-based evaluations, our model is consistently preferred over strong baselines. Extensive ablations characterize performance-efficiency trade-offs and identify simple choices that improve robustness in multi-WSI settings. Overall, this work provides a strong, reproducible baseline for efficient pathology report generation, lowering the barrier to multi-WSI VLM research under limited compute.

Pathology reports are structured, multi-granular documents encoding diagnostic conclusions, histological grades, and ancillary test results across one or more anatomical sites; yet existing pathology vision-language models (VLMs) reduce this output to a flat label or free-form text. We present HiPath, a lightweight VLM framework built on frozen UNI2 and Qwen3 backbones that treats structured report prediction as its primary training objective. Three trainable modules totalling 15M parameters address complementary aspects of the problem: a Hierarchical Patch Aggregator (HiPA) for multi-image visual encoding, Hierarchical Contrastive Learning (HiCL) for cross-modal alignment via optimal transport, and Slot-based Masked Diagnosis Prediction (Slot-MDP) for structured diagnosis generation. Trained on 749K real-world Chinese pathology cases from three hospitals, HiPath achieves 68.9% strict and 74.7% clinically acceptable accuracy with a 97.3% safety rate, outperforming all baselines under the same frozen backbone. Cross-hospital evaluation confirms generalisation with only a 3.4pp drop in strict accuracy while maintaining 97.1% safety.

Pathology report generation from whole-slide images (WSIs) is a rapidly growing multimodal learning problem, yet progress is difficult to measure because existing studies use heterogeneous datasets, model settings, visual encoders, and evaluation protocols. Moreover, commonly used natural language generation metrics, including BLEU, ROUGE, and METEOR, primarily reward lexical similarity and often fail to detect clinically consequential errors such as omitted diagnoses, hallucinated findings, or discordant tumor attributes. We present a standardized benchmark and evaluation framework for pathology report generation. The benchmark evaluates four representative methods across three datasets (TCGA, HistAI, and REG 2025) using three pathology foundation encoders (CONCHv1.5, UNI2-h, and H-Optimus-1). Our framework standardizes preprocessing, feature extraction, training, decoding, and evaluation, enabling fair comparison across models while providing a modular platform for integrating new methods, datasets, and encoders. A central contribution is the Clinical Report Quality Score (CRQS), a clinically grounded metric for evaluating factual correctness. CRQS maps reference and generated reports into structured clinical attributes and measures four complementary dimensions: clinical fact coverage, key information recall, hallucination rate, and clinical discordance, producing both an overall score and interpretable sub-scores. Experiments demonstrate that conventional language-generation metrics are weakly aligned with clinical correctness and frequently overestimate report quality. In contrast, CRQS reveals clinically meaningful differences between models and encoders that lexical metrics fail to capture. Together, the benchmark, public plug-and-play framework, and CRQS establish a reproducible foundation for rigorous evaluation of pathology report generation.