Abstract
Long-video language models cannot look at every frame: an hour sampled once per second is 3,600 images, and a system keeps only a small fixed slice of that pool. Which frames survive that slice is usually treated as a preprocessing detail; we test whether it should be. Published selectors make the comparison hard because they change the frame scorer, the prompt boundary, the resolution policy, and the answering model all at once. We hold each fixed and vary one decision at a time: selection, spatial compression, and reinvestment of the savings, across six training-free selection rules, three long-video benchmarks, and two answering models. Selection is the largest single lever: on LongVideoBench's hour-long bin, eight query-selected frames beat sixteen uniformly spaced ones by 6.9 points, and Orthogonal Matching Pursuit, an unmodified decades-old sparse-approximation algorithm, matches or comes within a point of every purpose-built selector we compare it against, across all three benchmarks. Compression is close to free: halving each frame's spatial budget at fixed timestamps costs at most 0.44 points. Reinvestment is where that budget turns back into accuracy: spending the freed tokens on twice as many compressed frames, at a measured cost no higher than the original eight, returns a further two to three points; compression only pays off once its savings are spent this way. Along the way, an implementation bug in our own AKS baseline and a 0.07 to 3.74 point gap between two harnesses running the same published rules at the same budget show why these comparisons need to happen inside one controlled harness rather than across papers.
Explore similar work
Aug 6, 2026cs.CV
Frame selection is essential for applying Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to long videos due to severe frame redundancy and limited context windows. Since the appropriate frame budget varies with the downstream LMM, reasoning demands, and latency constraints, a practical selector should serve multiple budgets. However, existing methods typically optimize an isolated frame subset for each predefined budget: when the budget changes, previously selected evidence may be replaced rather than progressively augmented. Ranking frames by a fixed score would allow prefix reuse across budgets, but it ignores the distinct roles of different ranking positions. In this paper, we formulate long-video frame selection as a Matryoshka ranking problem: constructing a single priority sequence whose small prefixes concentrate query-conditioned evidence, while progressively larger prefixes preserve this evidence and add broader temporal context. Efficiently constructing such a ranking is itself challenging, as densely sampling long videos and evaluating frame-query relevance incurs substantial overhead. We therefore introduce Matryoshka Evidence-to-Context (MEC) Frame Selection, a training-free framework that builds a reusable sparse video index, discovers candidates through sparse probing and local zooming, and greedily constructs a position-adaptive ranking: early positions emphasize evidence; later positions progressively favor temporal coverage while preserving visual diversity. A single ranking can thus be truncated to any target budget without rerunning the selector. Across four benchmarks and six frame budgets, MEC improves average accuracy over uniform sampling by 3.77 percentage points, matches strong state-of-the-art selectors, and reduces end-to-end selection latency by 47.37-51.19%.
Wang Chen, Yu Chen, Xiang Wang +3
Jul 17, 2026cs.CV
Understanding long videos with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) requires selecting a compact set of frames from thousands of candidates, yet identifying the right frames seemingly requires understanding the video first. We resolve this circular dependency with a simple observation: cross-modal attention at validation-selected extraction layers in MLLMs already provides query-relevant frame evidence without requiring autoregressive generation. We exploit this property to build DAFS (Dynamic Attention-based Budget-aware Frame Selection), a training-free frame selector. A lightweight MLLM selector, even with only 2B parameters, can extract frame-level evidence by converting selected-layer attention into relevance scores through query-conditioned aggregation. This enables cross-frame comparison without autoregressive decoding. To handle the selector's own context constraint, we formulate the joint allocation of candidate pool size and per-frame token budget as a discrete optimization problem solved by dynamic programming. Under a 32-frame budget, our selector improves over uniform sampling by up to 6.4 points on Video-MME and outperforms prior training-based selectors under matched frame budgets, while generalizing across selector and answerer backbones, and across tasks, without retraining.
Yilin Wang, Xiangxi Zheng, Dongxing Mao +6
Jun 17, 2026cs.CV
We introduce a compact empirical model that quantifies how answer accuracy degrades as a function of frame budget B and temporal distance D in long video understanding -- analyzing performance when recalling content from D seconds in the past using a fraction B of total frames. Long-form models operate under strict budgets, yet no prior framework predicts how accuracy degrades as B shrinks and events recede. We fit a weighted least-squares model on ~155,000 binary predictions across ten models and three sampling strategies, deriving a law where logit-accuracy scales linearly in log-budget with a distance-dependent exponent that decays log-linearly with distance. This budget exponent α(D) captures the marginal value of extra frames at distance D. The law achieves cell-level weighted R^2 = 0.05-0.75 across models. Notably, budget effectiveness at D = 1000 s differs by \approx 7.4\times between the best streaming and base models. STREAMINGVLM achieves α(1000) = 1.26 (95% CI: [1.06, 1.58]), meaning a tenfold budget increase substantially improves long-distance accuracy, while the best Qwen3-VL base model reaches only α(1000) = 0.17 (CI: [0.04, 0.34]). In accuracy space, a 10\times budget increase at D = 1000 s yields +29 percentage points for STREAMINGVLM versus +4 pp for the base model. Sampling strategies show model-dependent trade-offs: random sampling yields higher base sensitivity but steeper distance decay. We demonstrate how α(D) enables principled budget allocation, including a model-ranking reversal at long distance, and propose it as a diagnostic metric for streaming video models.
Yixian Tian