TreeFI: Value-Aware Statistical Fault Injection for Deep Neural Networks

Modern advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) rely on deep neural networks (DNNs) for perception and planning. Since DNNs' parameters reside in DRAM during inference, bit flips caused by cosmic radiation or low-voltage operation may corrupt DNN computations, distort driving decisions, and lead to real-world incidents. This paper presents a SpatioTemporal-Aware Fault Injection (STAFI) framework to locate critical fault sites in DNNs for ADAS efficiently. Spatially, we propose a Progressive Metric-guided Bit Search (PMBS) that efficiently identifies critical network weight bits whose corruption causes the largest deviations in driving behavior (e.g., unintended acceleration or steering). Furthermore, we develop a Critical Fault Time Identification (CFTI) mechanism that determines when to trigger these faults, taking into account the context of real-time systems and environmental states, to maximize the safety impact. Experiments on DNNs for a production ADAS demonstrate that STAFI uncovers 29.56x more hazard-inducing critical faults than the strongest baseline.

Fault injection attacks on embedded neural network models have been shown as a potent threat. Numerous works studied resilience of models from various points of view. As of now, there is no comprehensive study that would evaluate the influence of number representations used for model parameters against electromagnetic fault injection (EMFI) attacks. In this paper, we investigate how four different number representations influence the success of an EMFI attack on embedded neural network models. We chose two common floating-point representations (32-bit, and 16-bit), and two integer representations (8-bit, and 4-bit). We deployed four common image classifiers, ResNet-18, ResNet-34, ResNet-50, and VGG-11, on an embedded memory chip, and utilized a low-cost EMFI platform to trigger faults. Beyond accuracy evaluation, we characterize the injected fault pattern by analyzing the bit error rate, the spatial distribution of corrupted bytes, and the prevalence of 0xFE/0xFF byte values across formats, identifying the mechanisms responsible for the observed differences in resilience. Our results show that while floating-point representations exhibit almost a complete degradation in accuracy (Top-1 and Top-5) after a single fault injection, integer representations offer better resistance overall. In particular, the 8-bit representation on a relatively large network (VGG-11) retains Top-1 accuracy of around 70% and Top-5 at around 90%.

Deep neural networks (DNNs) deployed on resource-constrained neuromorphic hardware face three concurrent challenges: the need for model compression through pruning, vulnerability to adversarial input perturbations, and susceptibility to hardware-induced weight faults such as stuck-at-zero errors. While each of these factors has been studied in isolation, their combined effects on model reliability have received little attention. This paper presents an empirical investigation of how pruning, adversarial training, and hardware fault injection interact to affect the robustness of convolutional neural networks. Using a compact three-layer CNN trained on MNIST, we conduct three experiments: (1) comparing the fault tolerance of naturally and adversarially trained models under simultaneous hardware faults and adversarial attacks, (2) evaluating how pruning affects adversarial robustness, and (3) characterizing the joint accuracy surface across fault rates, adversarial perturbation magnitudes, and pruning levels. Our results show that adversarial training improves robustness against input perturbations but increases sensitivity to stuck-at-zero weight faults. Contrary to intuition, pruning did not significantly increase fault sensitivity, and varying the pruning level had little effect across fault rates and attack strengths. These results highlight the need to jointly consider adversarial robustness and hardware reliability.