RoboSPA: Can VLA Models Go Beyond Simple Scenes and Short-Horizon Tasks?

Vision-language-action models (VLAs) offer a promising route toward general-purpose robotics by transferring semantic knowledge from large-scale vision-language pretraining into language-conditioned control. However, most VLA evaluations emphasize aggregate manipulation success under changes in objects, instructions, or environments, leaving unclear how reliably these policies ground spatial descriptions in the physical scenes where they act. We therefore ask a sharper question: how reliably can current VLAs translate spatial descriptions into appropriate real-robot behavior? To investigate this, we introduce Spa-Bench, a real-robot benchmark that evaluates spatial grounding across six tabletop tasks covering Object State, Relative Size, Referential Description, Relational Placement, Ordinal Position, and Counting. Our primary evaluation compares in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) spatial configurations while retaining training support for the relevant objects, concepts, and actions, reducing object and motor unfamiliarity as alternative explanations for failure. Four diagnostic conditions further probe physical execution, sensitivity to wording, object-task associations, and recognition that no action is required. We release 4,092 episodes collected on the SO-101 robot arm: 1,200 human-teleoperated demonstrations and 2,892 real-robot evaluation rollouts from five state-of-the-art VLA policies. Across the three fully evaluated policies, success falls from 67.5-73.3% on ID spatial configurations to 40.7-52.0% on OOD spatial configurations, while matched direct instructions improve success by 28.3-40.0 percentage points. These results show that the evaluated VLAs can often execute the required manipulations but lack robust spatial grounding. Project materials, including videos, code, and benchmark data, are available at https://justintiensmith.github.io/Spa-Bench/.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly explored as visual critics, reward generators, and failure detectors in robotic manipulation. These roles implicitly require models to judge not only final task success, but also how a manipulation execution is physically and temporally progressing. However, existing evaluations fail to test whether VLMs possess fine-grained process understanding. To address this gap, we present RoboProcessBench, a benchmark for process-aware understanding in vision-language robotic manipulation. RoboProcessBench decomposes such capability into two complementary dimensions, static monitoring and dynamic reasoning, instantiated as 12 diagnostic question families covering phase, contact, motion, coordination, primitive-local progress, temporal order, outcome, and primitive-level transitions. Built from physically grounded execution traces, the curated benchmark corpus ProcessData contains \textasciitilde 58k question-answer pairs across 260 manipulation tasks, which is further split into ProcessData-SFT and ProcessData-Eval for post-training and evaluation purposes. Extensive evaluation of various VLMs on ProcessData-Eval reveals broad limitations across 12 diagnostic task families, suggesting current models still lack robust process-aware understanding of manipulation executions. But with ProcessData-SFT, the post-trained Qwen2.5-VL-7B and InternVL-3-8B exhibit consistent gains on local state, motion, progress, and primitive-aware cues. These results demonstrate that RoboProcessBench serves as both an evaluation benchmark and a learnable supervision source for developing VLMs capable of monitoring and evaluating robotic manipulation processes. Project webpage: https://processbench-2026.github.io.

Spatial grounding remains a key limitation of vision-language-action (VLA) systems for robotic manipulation. While current models can recognize objects and follow language instructions, they often lack an explicit representation of how objects are arranged in space, including support, containment, ordering, occlusion, and depth-sensitive relations. We introduce EmbodimentSemantic, a spatial scene-graph dataset and benchmark for evaluating relational grounding in embodied manipulation. EmbodimentSemantic represents scenes as directed object-relation-object triplets, where each triplet specifies a spatial relation between an ordered pair of objects using a fixed set of relations. This representation enables direct evaluation of object binding, relation prediction, and spatial consistency. The dataset includes real-world manipulation observations collected with the low-cost SO101 robot arm, together with generated scene graphs for studying spatial grounding in practical robotic settings. To provide controlled validation, we also introduce a simulator-grounded LIBERO benchmark with over 60K manipulation frames and more than 120K camera-specific scene graphs across paired third-person and wrist views, where ground-truth relations are derived automatically from MuJoCo geometry, world coordinates, camera projections, and visibility constraints. We further test whether scene graphs improve downstream control by injecting them into existing VLA policy prompts. Experiments across open-source and commercial VLMs show that current models often predict plausible relations but struggle with exact depth-aware and viewpoint-dependent spatial structure. EmbodimentSemantic provides a unified framework for diagnosing spatial grounding in VLM perception and testing its utility for VLA manipulation.