RefGuard: Identity-Aware Language-Guided Robot Manipulation via Joint Target-Anchor-Frame Grounding

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown strong capabilities in robotic manipulation, yet existing benchmarks typically assume that task-relevant information is explicitly specified in the instruction. In practice, however, humans frequently refer to objects, quantities, and relations implicitly, requiring robots to recover the intended target from linguistic and perceptual context. We study this capability as Implicit Referential Grounding (IRG) and introduce RoboIRG-Bench, a manipulation benchmark designed to systematically evaluate it. Built upon RoboMME, RoboIRG-Bench contains 40 variants derived from 11 tasks and covers four challenges, including direct, reasoning-mediated, spatial, and contextual referential grounding. As IRG often requires retaining and retrieving previously established context, we evaluate representative VLAs spanning different memory mechanisms. Our evaluation reveals a noticeable referential robustness gap. Models that perform well under explicit instructions can degrade sharply when the same task-relevant information must be recovered from context. Reasoning-mediated and spatial references are particularly challenging, while models using external VLMs show greater robustness but still exhibit significant failures. Moreover, replacing the external VLM with a stronger model does not eliminate these gaps. We further validate these findings on a Franka Research 3 robot arm, where the gap persists under real-world manipulation and manifests as both incorrect referent grounding and downstream execution failures. These results establish IRG as a distinct and underexplored capability for reliable robotic instruction following and highlight the need for VLAs that can robustly integrate language, perception, reasoning, and action.

While Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable flexible action generation, their generalization across diverse environmental elements, including manipulated objects, destinations, and backgrounds, is limited by the lack of diversity in robotic training data. Trained end-to-end on such data, VLAs tend to exploit visual shortcuts, associating actions with task-irrelevant visual features rather than the intended task semantics. These shortcuts block recomposition of elements already seen by the policy, that is, compositional generalization. Existing approaches mitigate such entanglement through task-relevant perception or targeted data diversification, but offer no explicit mechanism for unseen recomposition and require backbone-specific modifications with retraining. We observe that under such recomposition, VLAs often fail at global grounding while retaining local manipulation skills that recover near the correct target in familiar configurations. Therefore, we propose Referential Guidance (ReGuide), a training-free wrapper that, given object poses from a grounding module, combines semantic and geometric rebinding to guide the end-effector into demonstration-supported configurations of the instructed referent, where the frozen policy can resume execution. Experiments in simulation across multiple VLA backbones as well as on a real robot show that ReGuide improves success rates under compositional shifts by up to 56.8 and 75.0 percentage points, respectively, while preserving standard-task performance.

Vision language action (VLA) models enable generalist robotic agents but often exhibit language ignorance, relying on visual shortcuts and remaining insensitive to instruction changes. We present Prospective Grounding and Alignment VLA (ProGAL-VLA), which constructs a 3D entity-centric graph (GSM), uses a slow planner to produce symbolic sub-goals, and aligns them with grounded entities via a Grounding Alignment Contrastive (GAC) loss. All actions are conditioned on a verified goal embedding $g_t$, whose attention entropy provides an intrinsic ambiguity signal. On LIBERO-Plus, ProGAL-VLA increases robustness under robot perturbations from 30.3 to 71.5 percent, reduces language ignorance by 3x-4x, and improves entity retrieval from 0.41 to 0.71 Recall@1. On the Custom Ambiguity Benchmark, it reaches AUROC 0.81 (vs. 0.52), AUPR 0.79, and raises clarification on ambiguous inputs from 0.09 to 0.81 without harming unambiguous success. The verification bottleneck increases mutual information of language-actions, the GAC loss imposes an entity-level InfoNCE bound, and attention entropy yields calibrated selective prediction, indicating that explicit verified grounding is an effective path toward instruction-sensitive, ambiguity-aware agents.