Recursive Super-Resolution (SR) extends fixed-scale SR to extreme magnification by repeatedly feeding predictions back into the same model, analogous to zooming an image repeatedly. However, ground truth availability at every scale, especially at depth, remains challenging as the required source resolution grows geometrically, leaving deeper predictions unsupervised. We present OracleZoom, an on-policy distillation-inspired, reference-constrained framework that trains on its trajectory while carrying the last ground-truth evidence beyond the supervision boundary. Direct and cross-scale supervision constrain verifiable content, while a no-reference quality objective guides unresolved fine-scale detail. A KL-constrained pretrained latent prior limits quality-driven drift, while EMA consistency stabilizes the supervision boundary. Across seven datasets, OracleZoom achieves the state-of-the-art SR quality across zooming scales, averaging 0.713 CLIPIQA, with larger gains on deeper scales, while significantly reducing hallucinations. Code, data, and models are available at https://dipta007.github.io/OracleZoom/ .
Figures & tables
Figure 2: Overview of Oracle Zoom . The shared LoRA [ 14 ] adapted SR is applied recursively; available targets provide direct and cross-scale supervision, while a frozen quality model, KL prior, and EMA consistency constrain target-unavailable predictions. All auxiliary branches are training-only. By carrying the last verifiable ground-truth evidence beyond the supervision boundary, Oracle Zoom addresses the key gap in recursive SR where deeper predictions must otherwise be synthesized without direct visual supervision.
Method
In-domain
Out-of-domain
4KLSDB
DIV2K
DIV8K
No-reference quality
GT fidelity
No-reference quality
No-reference quality
GT fidelity
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
4× magnification
HiT-SR [ 93 ]
8.76
40.11
0.396
0.396
0.408
0.232
7.89
39.21
0.403
0.374
8.05
37.06
0.395
0.366
0.448
0.265
MambaIR [ 20 ]
8.68
41.24
0.405
0.412
0.412
0.233
7.81
40.57
0.419
0.386
8.00
38.53
0.412
0.377
0.449
0.268
Table 1: Per-dataset results across recursion depth on 4KLSDB ( in-domain ), DIV2K, and DIV8K ( out-of-domain ). All methods use the same CoZ recursion with matched zoom paths, crops, prompts, and evaluation. GT fidelity is reported only where genuine 4× targets are available; deeper scales have no ground truth. Bold : best; underline : second-best.
Figure 3: Qualitative comparison across 4 – 256× . OSEDiff smooths local structure, while CoZ develops repetitive textures at deeper zooms. Oracle Zoom preserves sharper, more detailed fur and skin structure through 256× . Colored boxes mark the next zoom region.
Figure 4: Effect of quality guidance and latent prior. Without Lqual , predictions become smooth, while removing Lprior introduces repetitive patterns at deeper zooms. The full objective preserves coherent detail through 256× . Colored boxes mark the next zoom region.
Method
No-reference quality
GT fidelity @ 4×
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
HiT-SR [ 93 ]
14.22
27.06
0.379
0.414
0.341
0.222
MambaIR [ 20 ]
14.69
27.34
0.382
0.428
0.343
0.224
SwinIR [ 40 ]
7.88
34.02
0.477
0.456
0.228
0.175
SeeSR [ 83 ]
8.35
48.46
0.532
0.546
0.216
0.164
OSEDiff [ 82 ]
6.70
51.38
0.548
0.581
0.336
0.228
Table 2: Aggregate results over all seven test sets. No-reference metrics average all four recursion scales; GT fidelity averages the four datasets with 4× targets. Oracle Zoom achieves the best MUSIQ, MANIQA, CLIPIQA, LPIPS, and DISTS. Bold : best; underline : second-best. Per-dataset results are in Table 1 .
Figure 5: Results across recursion depth. (a) Mean CLIPIQA over the test sets. (b) Projected-reference fidelity at 16× , measured by P-DISTS ( ↓ ). (c) Anchored hallucination rate for Oracle Zoom and CoZ, with 95% Wilson intervals. Oracle Zoom maintains perceptual quality, retains more of the last available reference, and reduces hallucination as recursion deepens.
Figure 6: Projected-reference fidelity at 16× . Native predictions appear plausible but cannot be compared with a 16× target. Projecting them to 4× enables direct comparison with the aligned ground-truth region. CoZ and OSEDiff alter the cable and panel boundaries, whereas Oracle Zoom remains closer to the reference, as reflected by the residual maps and projected scores.
Variant
LPIPS 4×↓
P-DISTS 16×↓
CLIPIQA 16×↑
Halluc. 16×↓
Full Oracle Zoom
0.199
0.215
0.714
0.303
−Lsup
0.215
0.222
0.719
0.353
−Lxscale
0.196
0.232
0.727
0.339
−Lqual
0.202
0.208
0.594
0.370
−Lprior
0.197
0.330
0.794
0.907
−Lema
0.203
0.216
0.702
0.305
Table 3: Ablation of the training objectives. Removing each term degrades a different aspect of performance, while the full objective gives the optimal fidelity, quality, and hallucination.
Appendix figures & tables24 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Hyperparameter
Value
Backbone & prompter (both frozen)
SR backbone
OSEDiff on SD3-medium
Prompter (VLM)
Qwen2.5-VL-3B-Instruct + CoZ adapter
Prompt length
32 max new tokens
LoRA adapter (only trainable weights)
Placement
SD3 transformer (MMDiT)
Appendix
Table 4: Training configuration for Oracle Zoom . Only the rank-16 LoRA adapter is optimized; the SR backbone, VAE decoder, VLM prompter, quality model, and base SR model remain frozen.
per recursion step
SR
PE
total
CoZ (the blind baseline)
0.152
1.334
1.486
Ours (as evaluated)
0.171
1.334
1.505
Ours, adapter merged
0.153
1.347
1.500
Appendix
Table 5: Inference latency per recursive step on 500 DIV2K images using one H100. Oracle Zoom adds only 0.019 s to the SR stage over CoZ, while merging the LoRA adapter reduces the SR-stage gap to 0.001 s.
Scale
ours
CoZ
tie
abst.
win-rate [95% CI]
4×
29
29
54
8
0.50[0.38,0.63]
16×
60
53
6
1
0.53[0.44,0.62]
64×
77
37
6
0
0.68[0.59,0.75]
256×
91
25
4
0
0.78[0.70,0.85]
Appendix
Table 6: Pairwise faithfulness evaluation across recursion depth. Oracle Zoom and CoZ are comparable at 4× and 16× , while Oracle Zoom is preferred at 64× and 256× . Win rates use decided comparisons only; brackets show Wilson 95% confidence intervals.
Supervision
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
DINOv2 ↑
CoZ (baseline)
0.2092
0.1585
0.9173
Latent MSE
0.2425
0.1936
0.9049
Decode-space LPIPS
0.1707
0.1407
0.9439
Appendix
Table 7: Where to apply target-available supervision at 4× . Decode-space LPIPS improves LPIPS, DISTS, and DINOv2 similarity over CoZ, whereas direct latent-space MSE degrades fidelity.
Reference
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
DINOv2 ↑
FID ↓
TOPIQ-FR ↑
Exact GT
0.178
0.145
0.945
41.1
0.641
Mildly degraded
0.183
0.146
0.942
42.3
0.633
Combined
0.188
0.147
0.940
44.8
0.621
CoZ (baseline)
0.234
0.164
0.908
60.7
0.548
Appendix
Table 8: Effect of reference quality at 4× . Exact ground truth gives the strongest fidelity, while a mildly degraded reference retains most of the improvement over CoZ.
Figure 7: The rubric used for pairwise judging at 4× , with the target high-resolution image as the anchor.
Figure 8: The rubric used for pairwise judging at 16× and deeper, with the previous zoom level as the anchor.
Figure 9: Effect of the no-reference quality objective across 4 – 256× . Two 4KLSDB examples compare TOPIQ-NR, HyperIQA, and Laplacian sharpness with all other settings fixed. TOPIQ-NR better retains fine-scale structure at deeper zooms, consistent with Table 9 ; colored boxes mark the region enlarged at the next step.
No-reference quality
Fidelity @ 4× (GT)
Coherence
Quality score
Hallucination
Quality model
CLIPIQA ↑
CQ 256↑
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
DINO 4×↑
Coher. ↑
TOPIQ 256↑
Halluc. ↓
Ours (TOPIQ-NR)
0.711
0.707
0.199
0.160
0.916
0.792
0.585
0.221
HyperIQA
0.680 −0.031
0.680 −0.027
0.197
0.158
0.917
0.816 +0.024
0.553
0.203
Laplacian
0.610 −0.100
0.579 −0.128
0.201
0.158
0.914
0.808 +0.016
0.467
0.247
Appendix
Table 9: Choice of no-reference quality model. TOPIQ-NR gives the strongest overall and 256× no-reference quality, while all three choices give similar 4× fidelity. HyperIQA slightly improves coherence, whereas Laplacian sharpness substantially reduces deep-zoom quality. Hallucination differences between the three variants are not significant.
4KLSDB
DIV8K
DRealSR
RealSR
Method
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
DINO ↑
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
DINO ↑
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
DINO ↑
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
DINO ↑
HiT-SR [ 93 ]
0.408
0.231
0.907
0.448
0.265
0.894
0.322
0.223
0.920
0.186
0.169
0.927
MambaIR [ 20 ]
0.412
0.233
0.903
0.449
0.268
0.897
0.326
0.225
0.916
0.185
0.169
0.928
SwinIR [ 40 ]
0.280
0.184
0.927
0.320
0.210
0.919
0.197
0.174
0.930
0.115
0.131
0.886
SeeSR [ 83 ]
0.260
0.174
0.917
0.263
0.174
0.917
0.177
0.156
0.928
0.164
0.151
0.885
OSEDiff [ 82 ]
0.335
0.215
0.793
0.380
0.243
0.788
0.318
0.231
0.805
0.310
0.223
0.729
Appendix
Table 10: Full-reference fidelity at 4× on the four datasets with genuine high-resolution targets. Oracle Zoom performs best on 4KLSDB and DIV8K, while results are more mixed on the real-camera DRealSR and RealSR sets. Best is bold ; second-best is underlined .
Scale
Method
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
4×
HiT-SR [ 93 ]
8.76
40.1
0.396
0.396
MambaIR [ 20 ]
8.68
41.2
0.405
0.412
SwinIR [ 40 ]
6.02
51.3
0.500
0.465
SeeSR [ 83 ]
5.44
63.5
0.569
0.615
OSEDiff [ 82 ]
5.00
60.3
0.559
0.608
CoZ [ 31 ]
5.74
64.4
0.582
0.623
Appendix
Table 11: Per-scale no-reference quality on 4KLSDB. Oracle Zoom achieves the highest CLIPIQA at every scale and the best MUSIQ and MANIQA from 16× onward. Best is bold ; second-best is underlined .
Figure 10: Qualitative results on 4KLSDB across 4 – 256× . The zoom follows a waffle-knit garment. OSEDiff progressively flattens the fabric into a nearly uniform field with regular grid-like texture, while CoZ stretches the folds into vertical bands. Oracle Zoom better preserves the fold relief and interlocking knit structure as recursion deepens; colored boxes mark the region enlarged at the next step.
Scale
Method
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
4×
HiT-SR [ 93 ]
7.89
39.2
0.403
0.374
MambaIR [ 20 ]
7.81
40.6
0.419
0.386
SwinIR [ 40 ]
5.66
51.0
0.510
0.458
SeeSR [ 83 ]
4.70
64.3
0.608
0.619
OSEDiff [ 82 ]
4.93
59.5
0.585
0.638
CoZ [ 31 ]
4.65
66.9
0.633
0.699
Appendix
Table 12: Per-scale no-reference quality on DIV2K. Oracle Zoom achieves the highest CLIPIQA at every scale and leads MUSIQ and MANIQA from 16× onward. Best is bold ; second-best is underlined .
Figure 11: Qualitative results on DIV2K across 4 – 256× . The zoom follows hanging cloth on a market stall. OSEDiff gradually loses the garment structure and produces a flat texture, while CoZ smooths the region into a largely uniform gradient. Oracle Zoom better preserves the visible weave, fiber structure, and seam-like boundaries through the deeper zooms; colored boxes mark the next enlarged region.
Scale
Method
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
4×
HiT-SR [ 93 ]
8.05
37.1
0.395
0.366
MambaIR [ 20 ]
8.00
38.5
0.412
0.377
SwinIR [ 40 ]
5.85
49.4
0.512
0.447
SeeSR [ 83 ]
4.66
63.9
0.612
0.610
OSEDiff [ 82 ]
4.88
60.6
0.596
0.639
CoZ [ 31 ]
4.67
67.0
0.638
0.697
Appendix
Table 13: Per-scale no-reference quality on DIV8K. Oracle Zoom achieves the highest CLIPIQA at every scale and leads MUSIQ and MANIQA from 16× onward. Best is bold ; second-best is underlined .
Figure 12: Qualitative results on DIV8K across 4 – 256× . The zoom follows the carved folds of a sandstone statue. OSEDiff introduces regular mesh-like patterns, while CoZ smooths the surface into broad wavy structures. Oracle Zoom better retains the carved relief and irregular stone texture across recursion; colored boxes mark the next enlarged region.
Scale
Method
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
4×
HiT-SR [ 93 ]
8.72
41.0
0.429
0.377
MambaIR [ 20 ]
8.63
42.8
0.446
0.382
SwinIR [ 40 ]
6.51
54.6
0.542
0.482
SeeSR [ 83 ]
5.85
66.9
0.640
0.639
OSEDiff [ 82 ]
5.59
59.3
0.587
0.636
CoZ [ 31 ]
6.14
67.2
0.642
0.670
Appendix
Table 14: Per-scale no-reference quality on DRealSR. Oracle Zoom achieves the highest CLIPIQA at every scale and leads MUSIQ and MANIQA throughout the target-unavailable zooms. Best is bold ; second-best is underlined .
Figure 13: Qualitative results on DRealSR across 4 – 256× . The zoom follows the surface of an unglazed stoneware planter. Both baselines progressively lose the original surface variation and approach a nearly flat field at deeper scales. Oracle Zoom retains a granular, directionally varying surface structure through 256× ; colored boxes mark the region enlarged at the next step.
Scale
Method
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
4×
HiT-SR [ 93 ]
9.55
42.4
0.407
0.542
MambaIR [ 20 ]
9.44
42.8
0.407
0.561
SwinIR [ 40 ]
5.56
52.1
0.503
0.570
SeeSR [ 83 ]
4.79
65.6
0.597
0.709
OSEDiff [ 82 ]
4.76
64.2
0.594
0.726
CoZ [ 31 ]
5.22
65.6
0.616
0.741
Appendix
Table 15: Per-scale no-reference quality on FFHQ. Oracle Zoom achieves the highest CLIPIQA at every scale and leads MUSIQ and MANIQA from 16× through 256× . Best is bold ; second-best is underlined .
Figure 14: Qualitative results on FFHQ across 4 – 256× . The zoom moves from the nose bridge toward the cheek. OSEDiff develops a regular canvas-like pattern and color smearing, while CoZ produces increasingly smooth skin with isolated artificial-looking structures. Oracle Zoom better preserves connected skin texture and local pore-like variation as recursion deepens; colored boxes mark the region enlarged at the next step.
Scale
Method
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
4×
HiT-SR [ 93 ]
7.95
36.4
0.402
0.362
MambaIR [ 20 ]
7.88
37.6
0.418
0.367
SwinIR [ 40 ]
5.74
49.0
0.513
0.427
SeeSR [ 83 ]
4.62
63.2
0.611
0.590
OSEDiff [ 82 ]
4.81
59.5
0.587
0.620
CoZ [ 31 ]
4.64
66.8
0.642
0.685
Appendix
Table 16: Per-scale no-reference quality on Flickr2K. Oracle Zoom achieves the highest CLIPIQA at every scale and leads MUSIQ and MANIQA from 16× onward, except MANIQA at 16× by 0.001 . Best is bold ; second-best is underlined .
Figure 15: Qualitative results on Flickr2K across 4 – 256× . The zoom follows dried seed pods surrounded by grass. OSEDiff introduces regular repeated texture before becoming increasingly smooth, while CoZ fragments and smears the pod structure at deeper scales. Oracle Zoom better preserves the pod boundaries, curled husk structure, and nearby leaf blades through the recursive zoom; colored boxes mark the next enlarged region.
Scale
Method
NIQE ↓
MUSIQ ↑
MANIQA ↑
CLIPIQA ↑
4×
HiT-SR [ 93 ]
9.22
34.7
0.372
0.346
MambaIR [ 20 ]
9.29
35.0
0.381
0.364
SwinIR [ 40 ]
6.78
50.4
0.510
0.447
SeeSR [ 83 ]
6.41
61.1
0.588
0.557
OSEDiff [ 82 ]
5.83
57.7
0.578
0.612
CoZ [ 31 ]
6.18
64.3
0.619
0.643
Appendix
Table 17: Per-scale no-reference quality on RealSR. Oracle Zoom achieves the highest CLIPIQA at every scale and leads MUSIQ and MANIQA throughout the target-unavailable zooms. Best is bold ; second-best is underlined .
Figure 16: Qualitative results on RealSR across 4 – 256× . The zoom follows a garment hanging on a clothing rack. At deeper scales, OSEDiff and CoZ increasingly reduce the garment to smooth or regularly patterned regions. Oracle Zoom retains more of the garment structure and fine fabric variation, with the clearest difference appearing at 256× ; colored boxes mark the region enlarged at the next step.
Aligning generative real-world image super-resolution models with human visual preference is challenging due to the perception--fidelity trade-off and diverse, unknown degradations. Prior approaches rely on offline preference optimization and static metric aggregation, which are often non-interpretable and prone to pseudo-diversity under strong conditioning. We propose OARS, a process-aware online alignment framework built on COMPASS, a MLLM-based reward that evaluates the LR to SR transition by jointly modeling fidelity preservation and perceptual gain with an input-quality-adaptive trade-off. To train COMPASS, we curate COMPASS-20K spanning synthetic and real degradations, and introduce a three-stage perceptual annotation pipeline that yields calibrated, fine-grained training labels. Guided by COMPASS, OARS performs progressive online alignment from cold-start flow matching to full-reference and finally reference-free RL via shallow LoRA optimization for on-policy exploration. Extensive experiments and user studies demonstrate consistent perceptual improvements while maintaining fidelity, achieving state-of-the-art performance on Real-ISR benchmarks.
Shijie Zhao, Xuanyu Zhang, Bin Chen +8
ByteDance Inc. · Peking University · The Chinese University of Hong Kong
The effectiveness of super resolution (SR) models hinges on their ability to recover high frequency structure without introducing artifacts. Diffusion based approaches have recently advanced the state of the art in SR. However, most diffusion based SR pipelines operate purely in the spatial domain, which may yield high frequency details that are not well supported by the underlying low resolution evidence. On the other hand, unlike supervised SR models that may inject dataset specific textures, single image SR relies primarily on internal image statistics and can therefore be less prone to dataset-driven hallucinations; nevertheless, ambiguity in the LR observation can still lead to inconsistent high frequency details. To tackle this problem, we introduce BATDiff, an unsupervised Bivariate A trous Wavelet Diffusion model designed to provide structured cross scale guidance during the generative process. BATDiff employs an a Trous wavelet transform that constructs an undecimated multiscale representation in which high frequency components are progressively revealed while the full spatial resolution is preserved. As the core inference mechanism, BATDiff includes a bivariate cross scale module that models parent child dependencies between adjacent scales. It improves high frequency coherence and reduces mismatch artifacts in diffusion based SR. Experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate that BATDiff produces sharper and more structurally consistent reconstructions than existing diffusion and non diffusion baselines, achieving improvements in fidelity and perceptual quality.
Diffusion models have recently demonstrated strong performance for image restoration tasks, including super-resolution. However, their large model size and iterative sampling procedures make them computationally expensive for practical deployment. In this work, we present TOC-SR, a framework for building efficient one-step super-resolution models by first discovering a compact diffusion backbone. Starting from a sixteen-channel latent diffusion model, we construct parameter-efficient surrogate blocks using feature-wise generative distillation and perform architecture discovery using epsilon-constrained Bayesian Optimization to minimize model complexity while preserving generative fidelity. The resulting compact diffusion backbone achieves a 6.6x reduction in parameters and a 2.8x reduction in GMACs compared to the expanded diffusion model. We then adapt this backbone for super-resolution and distill the diffusion process into a single-step generator. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach enables efficient super-resolution while maintaining strong reconstruction quality.