Reason Through the Latent! Making Latent Visual Reasoning Necessary

Continuous latent-space reasoning offers a compact alternative to textual chain-of-thought for multimodal models, enabling high-dimensional visual evidence to be integrated without explicit reasoning tokens. However, we identify a previously overlooked optimization pathology in existing latent visual reasoning methods: although visual latents become semantically enriched during training, their contribution to final answer prediction is systematically suppressed. Within the shared parameter space, the autoregressive objective favors shortcut reliance on direct visual input, driving latent tokens toward transition-like states rather than informative reasoning content. We term this phenomenon Silenced Visual Latents. To address it, we disentangle the two conflicting objectives by directly optimizing the latent reasoning at inference time, keeping backbone parameters frozen. In Stage I, visual latents are warmed up via query-guided contrastive latent--visual alignment, improving semantic quality while preventing latent collapse. In Stage II, the latent reasoning is further optimized via a confidence-progression reward, which incentivizes predicted token distributions along the latent span to become progressively more concentrated, routing predictions through the latent reasoning rather than bypassing it. Experiments across eight benchmarks and four model backbones show that inference-time latent optimization, without any parameter updates, effectively unleashes the suppressed reasoning capacity of visual latents.

Latent visual reasoning involves visual evidence more directly in multimodal reasoning by inserting continuous latent tokens before textual generation. However, the necessity of these latent tokens at inference remains ambiguous. We show that replacing latent tokens with random noise or removing them completely causes little performance degradation across spatial reasoning benchmarks. Reinforcement learning further diminishes the latent generation behavior after post-training. These observations raise a central question: Is latent visual reasoning still meaningful? We argue that its value should be measured by how effectively latent tokens guide learning, rather than whether they persist as an inference-time format. Our analysis shows that latent reasoning is unevenly favorable across question types, yet hard task-level routing for applying latent generation is brittle. Motivated by these findings, we propose an attention-based reward that encourages generated latent tokens to interact with later text tokens during RL. This reward promotes latent utilization when the latent mode is activated while preserving the flexibility to use pure-text reasoning. Experiments show that our method improves performance across perception and visual reasoning benchmarks, even when latent tokens are rarely generated after post-training. Our results highlight that, without explicit expression at inference, latent visual reasoning can shape better visual grounding and more accurate textual reasoning in silence. Our code and trained models are publicly available at \href{https://github.com/ddydyd32/silent-lvr/tree/master}{GitHub} and \href{https://huggingface.co/collections/cornuHGF/silent-lvr}{Hugging Face}.

Multimodal large language models have advanced visual understanding, yet perception-intensive reasoning remains challenging. Recent latent visual reasoning methods introduce hidden-space computation before answering, but they often rely on costly intermediate supervision, such as bounding boxes, sketches, or interleaved rationales. These strategies focus on how latent states should be shaped, but do not explicitly assess whether the latent is useful for the final answer. We propose LUT, a latent reasoning framework trained with only standard VQA pairs. LUT centers training on Latent Utility at two levels. At the trajectory level, we propose Utility-Aware Latent Distillation SFT, which explores answer-relevant latent trajectories, selects qualified trajectories by their information gain, and distills more reliable and learnable supervision through curriculum learning. At the step level, we propose Latent Attribution Policy Optimization, which uses answer-to-latent attribution to differentially optimize latent steps during reinforcement learning. Experiments on perception-intensive visual reasoning benchmarks show that LUT outperforms previous latent reasoning methods and remains competitive with latent-text interleaved methods with lower annotation cost.