Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) critically depends on retrieving the evidence necessary for effective reasoning. However, this remains particularly challenging in multi-hop question answering (QA), where supporting passages are often linked through intermediate entities and relations that must be progressively uncovered. Existing retrieval approaches typically rely on a single retrieval intent or one-shot query expansion, limiting their ability to adapt to newly retrieved evidence and potentially introducing noisy or redundant retrieval signals. To address these limitations, we propose a training-free multi-hop retrieval framework that integrates evidence-conditioned exploration, passage-specific contrastive refinement, and coverage-aware final ranking. During offline indexing, the framework constructs passage-specific contrastive facets that characterize each passage relative to its semantically similar neighbors, providing fine-grained signals to distinguish closely related candidates. At inference time, the framework iteratively retrieves evidence, generates probes targeting unresolved information needs, refines candidate relevance using the contrastive facets, and selects a complementary set of passages that collectively cover diverse evidence-seeking intents. Experiments on MuSiQue, HotpotQA, and 2WikiMultihopQA demonstrate consistent improvements in retrieval quality and downstream QA performance over baselines.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. Overall pipeline of the proposed retrieval framework, consisting of (A) offline contrastive facet indexing and (B) online multi-hop retrieval.
MuSiQue
HotpotQA
2WikiMultihopQA
Method
R@5
MAP@10
nDCG@10
FSR@10
R@5
MAP@10
nDCG@10
FSR@10
R@5
MAP@10
nDCG@10
FSR@10
BM25
34.58
28.91
39.18
10.20
66.75
57.03
66.61
62.80
54.60
47.71
59.16
28.70
e5-large-v2
52.19
46.03
57.58
27.10
88.80
78.73
84.75
89.20
72.15
69.26
78.12
51.00
bge-reranker
59.08
53.61
64.66
32.60
92.00
83.96
88.46
92.20
72.25
71.15
79.51
49.20
(Query Expansion)
HyDE
54.17
46.88
58.72
31.30
82.35
72.19
79.34
82.60
70.00
64.57
74.22
47.30
Table 1. Evaluation results on the MuSiQue, HotpotQA, and 2WikiMultihopQA datasets across different retrieval methods. R@5 denotes Recall@5, and FSR@10 denotes Full Support Recall@10. Recall measures the proportion of supporting passages retrieved; FSR measures the proportion of questions for which all supporting passages are retrieved; MAP measures mean average precision over the retrieval results; and nDCG evaluates ranking quality by assigning higher weights to relevant passages appearing earlier in the ranking.
R@10
nDCG@10
FSR@10
e5-large-v2
59.93
57.58
27.10
ours
80.41
72.67
57.00
(Ablation Variants)
w/o Coverage-aware Final Ranking
78.83
71.12
54.60
w/o Contrastive Evidence Refinement
79.72
72.38
55.60
w/o Sequential Evidence Exploration
68.75
65.98
36.50
Table 2. Ablation study of the proposed components on MuSiQue.
MuSiQue
HotpotQA
2WikiMultihopQA
EM
F1
EM
F1
EM
F1
BM25
8.1
15.39
35.0
47.59
20.3
26.94
e5-large-v2
14.1
23.61
46.7
62.09
32.0
39.01
bge-reranker
13.6
24.84
49.1
64.55
36.2
43.10
HyDE
16.5
26.11
43.2
58.75
32.1
39.24
query2doc
14.9
21.14
42.0
57.48
31.7
38.90
Table 3. Downstream QA performance using the top-5 retrieved passages.
Multi-hop question answering is a fundamental challenge in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), because deriving an answer requires integrating dispersed evidence. Iterative RAG (iRAG) is widely used for this challenge, but existing methods have two limitations. First, most methods still support each reasoning step with single-granularity evidence, making it difficult to balance information density and contextual noise. Second, existing methods often answer the original question only after aggregating evidence retrieved across intermediate steps, so redundant evidence and intermediate retrieval errors may accumulate and degrade the final answer. To address these limitations, we propose MEGRAG, an answer-aware framework that represents multi-hop reasoning as a path-structured multi-granular evidence graph. Offline, MEGRAG links passages to their sentences and extracted triples through a cross-granularity index. Online, it retrieves passages for the current query and selects aligned evidence, starting with compact triples and adding sentence or passage context as needed. MEGRAG uses the resulting intermediate answer and prior reasoning to decide whether the Initial Query has been resolved. If not, it identifies the missing information and formulates a focused next query; otherwise, it stops retrieval and returns the answer. Extensive experiments demonstrate consistent gains over a diverse set of RAG baselines.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs) on multi-hop question answering (QA), which requires reasoning over evidence from multiple documents. Current multi-hop RAG methods generally focus on either query-side task decomposition or corpus-side knowledge graph construction. Despite their progress, these methods still struggle to achieve satisfactory performance on complex multi-hop QA tasks. To this end, we propose ConRAG, a consensus-driven multi-view RAG framework that effectively boosts LLMs on complex multi-hop QA. The core of ConRAG is to systematically optimize both the query and corpus sides and to leverage multi-view evidence (relation, entity, and text signals) for more accurate retrieval. Extensive experiments on three multi-hop QA benchmarks show that ConRAG consistently outperforms all baselines by a clear margin, e.g., up to +26.9% average performance gains over vanilla RAG, and enables Gemma-4-31B to achieve a new state-of-the-art record on the challenging MuSiQue benchmark.
Yikai Zhu, Kunfeng Chen, Qihuang Zhong +2
School of Computer Science, Wuhan University Wuhan, China
Multi-hop Question Answering (MHQA) aims to answer questions that require multi-step reasoning. It presents two key challenges: generating correct reasoning paths in response to the complex user queries, and accurately retrieving essential knowledge in the face of potential limitations in large language models (LLMs). Existing approaches primarily rely on prompt-based methods to generate reasoning paths, which are further combined with traditional sparse or dense retrieval to produce the final answer. However, the generation of reasoning paths commonly lacks effective control over the generative process, thus leading the reasoning astray. Meanwhile, the retrieval methods over-rely on knowledge matching or similarity scores rather than evaluating the practical utility of the information, resulting in retrieving homogeneous or non-useful information. Therefore, we propose a Structured Entity-Aware Retrieval with Chain-of-Reasoning Navigator framework named SEARCH-R. Specifically, SEARCH-R trains an end-to-end reasoning path navigator, which is able to provide a powerful sub-question decomposer by fine-tuning the Llama3.1-8B model. Moreover, a novel dependency tree-based retrieval is designed to evaluate the informational contribution of the document quantitatively. Extensive experiments on three challenging multi-hop datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/ACL2026_SEARCH-R.
Yuqing Fu, Yimin Deng, Wanyu Wang +9
City University of Hong Kong · Xi’an Jiaotong University · Michigan State University +2