cs.CLSep 7, 2026

Where Should Language Sit in a Multimodal Model? Lessons from What Language Does to Human Perception and Cognition

Authors: Peng Xie, Amr Alanwar

Abstract

Language models compute over tokens: language is their input, their output, and increasingly their internal representation. Whether language should keep all of these positions depends on what language does to the system that uses it. The one system with a century of data on that question is the human. We review what language does to human perception, the brain, and thought, and read the same evidence against multimodal models and language models. Throughout, we treat language as a compressor that runs on a shared codebook: a word is an index, the content is in the receiver, and a community maintains the codebook. In humans the compression is measurable, learning the codebook reorganizes the senses, and thought survives the loss of language. We then measure the rule that models apply when two cues disagree, with cue-conflict experiments on six vision-language models and two robot policies. Surviving cues are weighted in the order their reliabilities prescribe, at 11 to 82% of the ideal observer's slope, and many answers copy the text. One policy family drops a cue that adds no information beyond the others rather than down-weighting it, another keeps it at a weight that fails when the cues conflict, and a visual cue that identifies the task in every training frame is never learned, because the language pathway already fits the data. Language models are the best current models of the human language network, and they have entered the human speech community, shifting word frequencies while alignment narrows their conceptual diversity. We close with seven implications for token-based systems. Language belongs at a model's boundary and in the shared codebook, as in the brain, not as its internal representation; the price of leaving the codebook inside is auditability.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jun 7, 2026cs.CL

When Correct Decisions Hide Internal Stress: Decision-State Probing in Multimodal Language Models

Multimodal language models are typically evaluated through external behavior: selecting the correct image--text match, rejecting unsupported captions, or answering visual queries correctly. However, correct behavior alone does not show that the model's internal decision state remains stable under controlled semantic stress. We study this gap through S3^3E (Structured Semantic Stress Evaluation), a framework for analyzing behavior-internal decoupling in multimodal language models. S3^3E uses a positive-anchored A/B forced-choice setup in which an image-supported caption is contrasted against semantic stress candidates under both original and swapped option orders, while hidden states are extracted at the pre-answer decision state. We focus on strict-correct trials, where the model consistently selects the correct caption across both orders. Rather than treating arbitrary hidden-state variation as evidence of instability, we measure whether semantic-conflict candidates induce excess decision-state displacement relative to meaning-preserving controls. Across Qwen3VL, Gemma3, and InternVL3, semantic stress consistently produces positive selected-layer excess displacement over lexical controls despite correct forced-choice behavior, while comparisons against random negatives are model-dependent. We interpret this as a scoped decision-state stress-sensitivity signal rather than evidence of downstream failure or hallucination. Our results suggest that forced-choice correctness alone is not a sufficient certificate of invariant internal decision geometry.
Haoran Zhao, Soyeon Caren Han, Eduard Hovy
Large Multimodal Models
AskPDF
May 10, 2026cs.AI

The Wittgensteinian Representation Hypothesis: Is Language the Attractor of Multimodal Convergence?

Understanding why independently trained neural networks from different modalities converge toward shared representations, and where this convergence leads, remains an open question in representation learning. All existing evidence relies on symmetric similarity measures, which can detect convergence but are structurally blind to its direction. We introduce directional convergence analysis using cycle-kNN, an asymmetric alignment measure, applied across dozens of independently trained unimodal models spanning point clouds, vision, and language. We uncover a consistent directional asymmetry: non-language modalities move toward the neighborhood structure of language significantly more than the reverse, and this pattern holds across all model families and scales--yet is entirely invisible to symmetric measures. Mechanistic analysis traces the directionality to feature density asymmetry, whereby language representations occupy the most compact regions of representational space. The Information Bottleneck framework provides a principled interpretation: optimization under compression drives representations toward discrete, compositional structures characteristic of language. We formalize this as the Wittgensteinian Representation Hypothesis: the semantic structure of language is the asymptotic attractor of multimodal representation convergence.
Zhaoyang Zhang, Run Shao, Dongyue Wu +4
Multimodal LearningNeural RepresentationsDirectionalityAttractorsOptimization Convergence Analysis
AskPDF
Sep 14, 2026cs.CL

Calibrated Ambiguity in Multimodal Language Models: Humans reach for cultural references, while models describe the picture

Ambiguity is often treated as a bug for AI systems to resolve---but in human communication and culture, ambiguity can also be a generative resource. From humour to politics to art, people express themselves in words and images that are open enough to invite different interpretations, yet constrained enough to be interpretable. We operationalise this notion of calibrated ambiguity with a task drawn from the parlour game Dixit. We compare differences in clues generated by human vs multimodal language models, based on a novel coding rubric for calibrated ambiguity, and find that models consistently exhibit ambiguity collapse (i.e., their outputs are over-specified, leaving no room for multiple legitimate interpretations). Unlike human clues, AI-generated clues also exhibit cultural flattening; they almost never make reference to culturally-situated knowledge, even when prompted to use allusion and figurative language.
Cody Kommers, Mingrui Ye, Evelyn Gius +4
AmbiguityCultural AlignmentEvent-Grounded Multi-Turn ConversationsInterpretive Openness
AskPDF