The Sample Complexity of Quantum Entanglement Allocation

We study stabilizer state testing and learning with limited coherent quantum memory. Here an algorithm sequentially receives copies of an unknown $n$-qubit state, but may keep only $k$ qubits of coherent quantum memory between measurements. With unrestricted memory, seminal work of Gross, Nezami and Walter showed how to test $n$-qubit stabilizer states using $6$ copies, which is dimension independent, unlike the learning complexity of $Θ(n)$. We show that this testing-vs-learning separation is lost under memory constraints. More concretely we show that (1) The sample complexity of testing stabilizer states in the $k$-qubit memory framework is $Θ(n-k)$. Our upper bound goes via a novel connection to the hidden shift problem and the lower bound is proven using a novel approach to average case bounds on likelihood ratios via combinatorics of the stochastic orthogonal group. (2) The sample complexity of learning stabilizer states with $k$ qubits of memory, in the non-adaptive framework, is $Θ(n^2/k)$. As a further application of our techniques, we prove an exponential lower bound for purity testing even when the memory may be left coherent throughout the protocol. Our main results identify coherent quantum memory as the resource enabling the usual separation between stabilizer testing and learning. In particular, even with $k=0.99n$ qubits of memory, there is no constant-copy stabilizer tester; furthermore for $k=cn$ qubits of memory (for $0< c < 1$), stabilizer testing is as hard as learning, with both requiring $Θ(n)$ copies.

Parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) are increasingly used as policies and value functions in quantum reinforcement learning, yet it remains unclear when and why quantum policies generalize. We give a PAC-Bayesian account in which generalization is governed not by the raw number of circuit parameters, but by the effective dimension of the Fisher geometry induced by the circuit. This quantity is inflated by entanglement, making entangling connectivity an independent axis of complexity.In controlled experiments that fix the number of trainable rotations and vary only entanglement, we find that circuits with larger Fisher effective dimension exhibit larger train-test gaps, while parameter count is a weak predictor. The resulting bound acts primarily as a ranking certificate: it correctly orders circuits with identical parameter count, which parameter-counting bounds cannot do. We validate this mechanism across supervised classification, quantum contextual bandits, and value-function generalization, where entangled circuits consistently generalize worse than non-entangled circuits of equal parameter count, with gaps shrinking as sample size increases.Our strongest evidence comes from low-variance decision models, including single-observable classifiers, value heads, and one-step policies. In end-to-end multi-step policy learning, entanglement effects remain statistically significant but high return variance leaves the full ordering only partially resolved. Partial-correlation analysis shows that Fisher effective dimension screens off entangling pattern, and controls for training accuracy, readout, and optimizer rule out major optimization confounders. The effect also persists on an IBM Heron quantum processor under real noise. Overall, our results reframe quantum policy design around an entanglement--generalization trade-off rather than expressivity alone.

We consider the problem of testing and learning from data in the presence of resource constraints, such as limited memory or weak data access, which place limitations on the efficiency and feasibility of testing or learning. In particular, we ask the following question: Could a resource-constrained learner/tester use interaction with a resource-unconstrained but untrusted party to solve a learning or testing problem more efficiently than they could without such an interaction? In this work, we answer this question both abstractly and for concrete problems, in two complementary ways: For a wide variety of scenarios, we prove that a resource-constrained learner cannot gain any advantage through classical interaction with an untrusted prover. As a special case, we show that for the vast majority of testing and learning problems in which quantum memory is a meaningful resource, a memory-constrained quantum algorithm cannot overcome its limitations via classical communication with a memory-unconstrained quantum prover. In contrast, when quantum communication is allowed, we construct a variety of interactive proof protocols, for specific learning and testing problems, which allow memory-constrained quantum verifiers to gain significant advantages through delegation to untrusted provers. These results highlight both the limitations and potential of delegating learning and testing problems to resource-rich but untrusted third parties.