Multi-modal medical image segmentation leverages complementary diagnostic information, yet fusion can underperform single-modality baselines when spatially aligned inputs differ in quality. Here, "corruption" primarily denotes resolution-induced degradation rather than misalignment or complete modality absence, while synthetic noise is evaluated only as an auxiliary setting. We identify a critical optimization-inference inconsistency: degraded modalities can receive weak training updates yet substantially affect predictions, indicating active interference with fusion. We attribute this failure to resampling-induced feature corruption and optimization bias, where noisy features propagate through skip connections and encourage unreliable modality selection. We therefore propose CoReFuse-Med, a Corruption-aware Rebalanced Fusion framework that suppresses corruption during feature transmission and rebalances modality contributions during high-level fusion. Experiments on EPVS, BraTS, and WMH, including multiple Z-axis slice-retention ratios and an auxiliary noise test, demonstrate improved accuracy and robustness under modality-quality discrepancies. Our code is available at https://github.com/lrever/CoReFuse.
Multimodal medical imaging fuses complementary anatomical and functional information, yet modalities frequently disagree in pathologically heterogeneous regions. Current segmentation models handle this in one of two inadequate ways: deterministic fusion that averages away disagreement, or post-hoc uncertainty estimation decoupled from the fusion process that produces it. Both obscure the clinically critical question: why is this prediction unreliable? We present EnTrust, a framework that treats inter-modal conflict as the primary source of predictive uncertainty. Our EnFuse module decomposes multimodal features into three disentangled components: shared anatomical consensus (F_c), modality-specific cues (F_{u,m}), and spatially localized conflict signals (F_{cf}), with independence enforced via a cross-covariance objective. This structured decomposition conditions SegDiff, a diffusion-based generative segmentation model whose sampled hypotheses diverge specifically in regions of modal disagreement. TrustMap then translates this hypothesis divergence into calibrated, pixel-wise uncertainty using ensemble entropy, conflict-guided perturbation probing, and a learned calibration head, enabling clinicians to understand not only where predictions are uncertain, but why. Across four benchmarks spanning brain, cardiac, lesion, and oncology domains, EnTrust achieves state-of-the-art segmentation accuracy while reducing calibration error by 40% compared to the strongest baseline. Notably, it outperforms 5x deep ensembles using a single model at roughly half the memory footprint. Code and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/GenMI-Lab/EnTrust.git.
Medical image fusion aims to integrate complementary information from diverse imaging modalities to support clinical diagnosis. Existing methods typically apply uniform fusion rules globally, lacking a deep understanding of diagnostic intents and pathological structures. To address these limitations, we propose MIND, a Multimodal Intent-Driven Network via Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) for medical image fusion. Specifically, we utilize BioMedGPT to generate intent-driven fusion texts from source images, guiding the fusion process with pathology-aware diagnostic intents. To combat the loss of 2D spatial continuity caused by 1D sequence flattening in DiTs, we design a Multi-scale Latent Adapter. This module explicitly extracts source image features before serialization, injecting them into the network via strict dimensional alignment to effectively supplement image features. To resolve the semantic shift caused by decoupling image outputs from diagnostic intents, we design a medical semantic consistency loss. This loss ensures deep semantic locking between fused images and fusion texts while maintaining the stability of the underlying physical manifold reconstruction. Comprehensive experiments on the Harvard, BraTS, and GFP datasets reveal that MIND delivers superior fusion quality, significantly improves downstream brain tumor segmentation accuracy, and enables flexible interactive fusion, holding significant promise for intent-driven intelligent clinical decision support systems.
Purpose: Developing generalizable medical image segmentation models is challenging because imaging data are distributed across institutions and differ in modality and acquisition protocol. Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training without centralizing raw medical images, but cross-modality domain shifts between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can substantially reduce model performance. This study investigates augmentation-driven cross-modality FL for abdominal organ and whole-heart segmentation. Methods: We evaluate convolution-based spatial augmentation, frequency-domain argumentation, domain-specific normalization, and global intensity nonlinear (GIN) augmentation for multimodal segmentation. Abdominal organ segmentation and whole-heart segmentation are first evaluated using a 2D U-Net framework. For whole-heart segmentation, we additionally perform native 3D experiments using a self-configuring nnU-Net architecture on the CARE-WHS 2026 dataset, enabling evaluation of whether the observed cross-modality FL behavior persists when moving from slice-based 2D segmentation to volumetric 3D segmentation. Results: GIN provides the most consistent cross-modality performance among the evaluated approaches in the original 2D experiments. For pancreas segmentation, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) improved from 0.073 to 0.437 when CT data were incorporated through federated cross-modality training. In 3D whole-heart segmentation, FedGIN improved mean DSC over FedAvg from 0.8696 to 0.8901 on the unseen CT center and from 0.7160 to 0.7956 on the unseen MRI center. Relative to centralized GIN training, FedGIN retained 92.4% of performance on unseen CT data and achieved comparable performance on unseen MRI data (0.7956 versus 0.7937).