Evaluation of Vision-Language Models Across Diverse Coastal Environments

Coastline detection in remotely sensed imagery is commonly formulated as pixel-wise segmentation, even though coastlines used in coastal monitoring are ultimately represented as geometric curves and defined by geomorphic proxies such as vegetation lines, dune toes, or cliff edges. We revisit coastline extraction from a representation perspective and formulate the task as geometric boundary localization, where a thin coastline boundary is localized directly as a curve rather than derived from a segmentation mask. Using the New Zealand Coastal Change Dataset (NZCCD) and LINZ aerial imagery, we develop CoastlineVLM-7B, a vision-language model built on the GeoChat-7B/LLaVA-1.5 architecture that jointly performs coastline presence detection, proxy-type classification, and direct coastline grounding as an ordered polyline. We compare it against U-Net, UNet++, DeepLabV3+, and SegFormer trained using one-pixel-wide coastline masks and evaluate localization using tolerance- and distance-based geometric metrics. On the West Coast test set, U-Net provides stronger local boundary proximity, showing better tolerance scores and lower Chamfer and Modified Average Hausdorff distances, while CoastlineVLM-7B achieves the lowest Hausdorff and Earth Mover's distances, indicating reduced worst-case deviation and stronger global structural correspondence. Ablation studies show that geometric localization is driven primarily by direct coastline-grounding supervision and that GeoChat initialization provides a stronger starting representation than generic LLaVA-1.5 initialization. Zero-shot evaluation on the Australian VCMP dataset shows reduced performance for U-Net and CoastlineVLM-7B, but CoastlineVLM-7B achieves better geometric localization than U-Net. These results show that direct ordered-polyline grounding can be used as an alternative formulation for representing and localizing coastline geometry.

Efficient transfer learning of vision-language models (VLMs) commonly suffers from a Base-New Trade-off (BNT): improving performance on unseen (new) classes often degrades accuracy on known (base) classes. Addressing how to boost recognition of unseen classes without sacrificing known-class performance remains a central challenge. Existing work often simplistically attributes the BNT to overfitting on known classes. We observe an interesting phenomenon: VLMs frequently exhibit asymmetric confusion on certain downstream data, i.e., samples of class A are systematically mispredicted as class B, while the reverse confusion (B to A) rarely occurs. For known classes, this kind of bias can be mitigated by tuning using a cross-entropy loss, but for unseen classes, such pretraining-induced bias persists and harms generalization. Motivated by this, we propose NeRP, a plug-and-play prompting correction strategy that improves discrimination on unseen classes without modifying model parameters. NeRP leverages neutral text prompts and reference images to measure class-wise prior preferences along the pre-trained inter-class geometry, and combines them with the sample likelihood to obtain the model's surrogate score. If, for a given sample, the prior strongly favors the current prediction while the observed evidence is clearly insufficient, we perform a local flip between easily confusable class pairs, thereby correcting prior-dominated mispredictions. Extensive experiments across multiple backbones and 15 few-shot and cross-domain benchmarks show that NeRP substantially improves accuracy on unseen classes while preserving known-class prediction performance.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are fragile under image corruption. We find that the wording of the question affects VLMs in two opposite ways. Verbose questions make VLMs substantially more robust---e.g., rephrasing "Is there a cat?" into "Please look carefully and answer: is there a cat?". Conversely, VLMs become more fragile under corruption when the question is semantically complex or finer-grained, e.g., "what colour is the cup left of the chair?" instead of "is there a cup?". Both effects stem from question-conditioned cross-modal attention, which induces a spectral filter over image patches: verbose questions broaden its frequency support, while fine-grained questions concentrate it onto fewer visual scales. The model's answer drifts most when this filter and the corruption sit on the same spatial frequencies. We test the filter view on Qwen3-VL and LLaVA-OneVision across GQA and CLEVR; verbose paraphrasing reduces drift variance by 70--81% on the 8B models. The practical recipe---pad the prompt---further yields measurable gains in accuracy, even under image corruption.