cs.CCSep 12, 2026

Gap Entropy and Almost Instance-Wise Optimal Best-Arm Identification

Authors: Jiarui Yao, Jiaxi Zhao, Xiangxin Zhou

Organizations: UIUC · NUS · Tencent Hunyuan

Abstract

In the best-arm identification problem, we are given nn stochastic arms with unknown means and wish to identify the arm with the largest mean with probability at least 1−δ1-δ, using as few samples as possible. We consider independent Gaussian rewards with unit variance and means in [0,1][0,1]. Chen and Li [2016] conjectured that the instance-wise sample complexity of this problem is characterized by the gap entropy, up to an additive term arising from the two-arm problem. In this paper, we resolve their gap-entropy and almost instance-wise optimality conjectures. For an instance II, let Δ[i]Δ_{[i]} be the gap between the largest and the ii-th largest mean, let H(I)=∑i=2nΔ[i]−2H(I)=\sum_{i=2}^{n}Δ_{[i]}^{-2}, and let Ent(I)(I) denote the entropy of the normalized complexities of its dyadic gap groups. For every 0<δ<0.10<δ<0.1, we show that the order-oblivious instance-wise lower bound is Θ(H(I)[log⁡(1/δ)+Ent(I)]).Θ (H(I)[\log(1/δ)+Ent(I)]). We also give a single δδ-correct algorithm with expected sample complexity O(H(I)[log⁡(1/δ)+Ent(I)]+Dlog⁡(e+log⁡(e+D))),D=Δ[2]−2,O ( H(I)[\log(1/δ)+Ent(I)] +D\log(e+\log(e+D))),D=Δ_{[2]}^{-2}, without prior knowledge of the gaps. Our lower bound removes the dyadic-gap and monotonicity restrictions of previous work, and our upper bound removes the additional polylogarithmic factor multiplying the two-arm term. Thus, a single algorithm attains the instance-wise lower bound up to an additive two-arm term. The main theorems have been formalized and proved in Lean 4.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Sep 9, 2026

A positive resolution of the gap-entropy conjecture

We prove the gap-entropy conjecture for fixed-confidence best-arm identification with independent unit-variance Gaussian arms, means in [0,1][0,1], and a unique optimal arm. For each suboptimal arm ii, let Δi=μ∗−μiΔ_i=μ_*-μ_i be its gap from the optimal mean, and write H=∑i≠∗Δi−2H=\sum_{i\ne *}Δ_i^{-2}. Let prp_r be the fraction of HH contributed by arms with 2−(r+1)<Δi≤2−r2^{-(r+1)}<Δ_i\le2^{-r}, and let Ent(I)=∑r:pr>0prlog⁡(1/pr)\mathrm{Ent}(I)=\sum_{r:p_r>0} p_r\log(1/p_r). Among all algorithms that identify the optimal arm with probability at least 1−δ1-δ on every Gaussian instance, the optimal expected number of samples on a given instance, averaged over all permutations of the arm labels, is within absolute constant factors of H(log⁡(1/δ)+Ent(I))H(\log(1/δ)+\mathrm{Ent}(I)). Moreover, there is an algorithm, independent of the instance, whose expected number of samples is bounded by a constant multiple of this quantity plus g−2log⁡log⁡(ee/g)g^{-2}\log\log(e^e/g), where g=min⁡i≠∗Δig=\min_{i\ne *}Δ_i is the gap to the closest competitor.
Oct 2, 2026

Nearly Optimal Fixed-Confidence Best-Arm Identification with 1-Bit Feedback

We study fixed-confidence best-arm identification under strict 1-bit feedback constraints. At each round, the learner selects an arm and a query set, and receives only a single bit indicating whether the sampled reward belongs to that set. We consider a distribution-free finite-variance setting with arm-wise localization, where direct empirical mean estimation is no longer available and clipping becomes unavoidable. We first formulate a time-uniform 1-bit mean-estimation primitive based on randomized threshold queries and a clipped tail-integral identity. We then embed this primitive into candidate-challenger best-arm identification algorithms. A fixed-clipping algorithm gives a simple anytime (ε,δ)(ε,δ)-PAC guarantee, while a phased adaptive-clipping algorithm matches the clipping level to the current resolution and yields a gap-adaptive sample complexity. We also prove a KK-arm worst-case information-theoretic lower bound showing that the logarithmic penalty caused by finite-variance 1-bit feedback is intrinsic. This bound matches the leading dependence of the phased algorithm up to lower-order log⁡log⁡\log\log factors.
Mar 11, 2026

On the Complexity of Best-Arm Identification in Non-Stationary Linear Bandits

We study the fixed-budget best-arm identification (BAI) problem in non-stationary linear bandits. Concretely, given a fixed time budget T∈NT\in \mathbb{N}, finite arm set X⊂Rd\mathcal{X} \subset \mathbb{R}^d, and a potentially adversarial sequence of unknown parameters {θt}t=1T\lbrace θ_t\rbrace_{t=1}^{T} (hence non-stationary), a learner aims to identify the arm with the largest cumulative reward x∗=arg⁡max⁡x∈Xx⊤∑t=1Tθtx_* = \arg\max_{x \in \mathcal{X}} x^\top\sum_{t=1}^T θ_t with high probability. In this setting, it is well-known that i.i.d. sampling arms from the G-optimal design yields a minimax-optimal error probability of exp⁡(−Θ(T/HG))\exp\left(-Θ\left(T / H_{G}\right)\right), where HGH_{G} scales proportionally with the dimension dd. However, this notion of complexity is overly pessimistic, as it is derived from a lower bound in which the arm set consists only of the standard basis vectors, thus masking any potential advantages arising from arm sets with richer geometric structure. To address this, we establish an arm-set-dependent lower bound that, in contrast, holds for any arm set. Motivated by the ideas underlying our lower bound, we propose the Adjacent-optimal design, a specialization of the well-known XY\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}-optimal design, and develop the Adjacent-BAI\textsf{Adjacent-BAI} algorithm. We prove that the error probability of Adjacent-BAI\textsf{Adjacent-BAI} matches our lower bound up to constants, verifying the tightness of our lower bound, and establishing the arm-set-dependent complexity of this setting.