cs.LGSep 12, 2026

Data-Free On-Policy Distillation: How Far Can We Go Without External Data?

Authors: Gengsheng Li, Mao Zheng, Mingyang Song, Jie Sun, Zeyuan Liu, Ruiqi Liu, Tianyu Yang, Qiyong Zhong, 

Organizations: Foundation Model Research Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences · School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Foundation Model Department, Tencent · National University of Singapore · 

Abstract

On-policy distillation (OPD) is increasingly applied to frontier foundation model post-training. Prior work in this area has largely focused on algorithmic advances, yet it remains unclear how much OPD depends on its training questions and, in particular, how far this dependence can be reduced. Across two representative single-teacher OPD settings, we find that training on 8 real prompts yields performance comparable to training on 17k problems, while datasets differing substantially in measured difficulty and initial distillation gap yield similar outcomes. Our analyses suggest two complementary explanations: repeated sampling could allow even a few prompts to expose substantial teacher supervision, while OPD transfers generalizable reasoning capabilities beyond dataset-specific knowledge. Building on these observations, we next propose a data-free on-policy distillation (DF-OPD) setting to investigate whether the system can supply the training questions itself, eliminating the need for external data. With 64 self-generated questions obtained without seed examples, DF-OPD yields performance comparable to full-data OPD in both single-teacher settings. This finding also holds in multi-teacher OPD: across mathematics, code, and instruction following, 1k generated questions achieve performance comparable to training on approximately 7k real post-training examples. We further explore whether OPD can operate even without explicit training questions. The experiments show that this is effective only in limited cases, where the student unexpectedly generates and answers its own questions, thereby reducing the process to an implicit form of DF-OPD. Together, these findings invite a reassessment of the role of training data in on-policy distillation. Code is available at https://github.com/Ryuki661/DF-OPD

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables22 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models II: One Training Example

    Sep 3, 2026Zixuan Fu, Bingxiang He, Yuxin Zuo +10Language Model DistillationOn-Policy Distillation

  2. Ask to Distill: Learning to Synthesize Data for On-Policy Distillation

    Oct 20, 2026Jiashuo Sun, Hao Zhang, Xueqiang Xu +9Language Model DistillationOn-Policy Distillation

  3. What Matters in On-Policy Distillation? A Perspective on Data Efficiency and Data Selection

    Sep 4, 2026Zhinan Hou, Jiaqi Zhang, Xunliang Cai +1Language Model DistillationOn-Policy Distillation