quant-phSep 13, 2026

Certification cost of quantum models: measurement correlation, not parameter count

Authors: Pavel Sulimov, Claude Lehmann

Organizations: Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Winterthur, Switzerland · University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Reporting the Fisher geometry of a trained variational quantum model is routine; quoting the shot budget that would establish it is not. Certifying an empirical Fisher matrix to relative Frobenius error ε\varepsilon under coordinate-wise parameter shift costs Θ(Bp2V/(ε2G))Θ(B p^{2} V/(\varepsilon^{2} G)) circuit executions, where VV is the measured readout variance and GG the measured squared gradient norm, with uniform allocation optimal in that class. One constant reproduces the cost of two circuit families whose exponents differ by a full power of pp. The exponent is an identity in how nVnV and nGnG scale with the register, holding family by family to 0.0010.001 across 624 matrix-product-state cells once the finite-pp prefactor is removed. The cubic cost is therefore a finite-size window, set by whether the readout light cone grows with the register. A product family to 256 qubits gives 1.9661.966 (95% CI 1.9341.934--1.9971.997); a brickwork entangler falls from 2.8532.853 below ten qubits to 1.7151.715 beyond sixty-four; a blocked entangler gives 1.9841.984 at a fixed cone width against 3.0343.034 at a proportional one. Fixed device connectivity fixes the cone, so a cubic budget from a small simulation overestimates a large machine, on top of hardware multipliers 2.07×2.07\times (1.411.41--3.023.02), 2.38×2.38\times and 1.91×1.91\times on ibm_marrakesh, ibm_fez and ibm_kingston. Cost-optimal readout weights cut the measured shot budget by 2.67×2.67\times (1.331.33--4.004.00) on hardware, flat from four to twelve qubits. A discrepancy model fitted on cheap circuits transfers its mean inside the calibration grid and, at six larger sizes named before the data, does not: nominal 90% intervals cover 36%, and split conformal is the only rung that stays near nominal.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables2 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Jul 13, 2026

When cheap gradients fail: the measurement cost of attacking quantum classifiers

Adversarial perturbations threaten machine learning classifiers, including variational quantum classifiers. We show that finite quantum measurement statistics (shot noise) act as a built-in defense against gradient-based test-time attacks whose cost scales unfavorably for the attacker. Because every gradient component must be inferred from repeated circuit executions under any unbiased gradient-estimation rule, white-box extraction consumes a dimension-dependent measurement budget that measurement grouping cannot remove in expressive circuits. Under stated assumptions, single-step attacks need at least quadratically many shots in the input dimension dd, growing as d5/2d^{5/2} under norm-concentration scaling, with a sufficient-budget analysis for iterative attacks via stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics. Simulations up to 784 input dimensions validate the law: the realized total budget is the d5/2d^{5/2} geometric floor for plateau-mitigated models and grows as d3.00d^{3.00} for the tested deep circuits, whose gradient norms decay with dimension absent barren-plateau mitigation; folding the measured gradient norm back in recovers the parameter-free d3/2d^{3/2} shot-noise geometry. Against a matched classical baseline whose attack overhead is dimension-independent (the cheap-gradient principle of automatic differentiation), the quantum gradient cost ratio grows empirically as d3.00d^{3.00}, so the attacker's relative cost diverges as the model scales. Experiments on a 156-qubit IBM processor (ibm_boston, 4-qubit circuits, d=12d=12) reproduce the effect: at matched budgets the device attack tracks the ideal within a few percent, with the high-shot gradient faithful to the exact one. The defense operates precisely when the forward map is classically hard to simulate: only then is a white-box attacker denied the simulate-and-backpropagate shortcut and must pay the measurement cost we quantify.
Aug 7, 2026

Readout-Rank Laws for Isotropic Quantum Tangents

Deep parameterized quantum circuits may remain sensitive to a parameter change while the observables retained by a learning model barely respond. We study this separation for a fixed computational-basis measurement. For a pure-state tangent, we compare the quantum Fisher information FQF_Q, the Fisher information FfullF_{\rm full} in the complete bitstring distribution, and the largest variance-normalized response IA\mathcal I_{\mathcal A} available to a diagonal readout space A\mathcal A. If the joint state--tangent frame is Haar random, we prove that the two successive information fractions are independent Beta variables whose means are 1/21/2 and r/(2n−1)r/(2^n-1), where rr is the centered dimension of the readout. Consequently, even the joint span of all computational-basis Pauli strings through any fixed weight kk retain only O(nk2−n)O(n^k2^{-n}) of the full-record information. Exact-statevector experiments across six circuit families show increasing finite-size agreement with this hierarchy in five nonconserving ensembles as the circuit depth grows. A number-conserving family departs strongly from the isotropic prediction even after correcting the support and readout rank, showing that rank alone is insufficient without tangent isotropy.
Jul 11, 2026

Quantum Circuit Vision: Cost-Aware Evaluation of Visual AI Agents for Quantum Code Generation

Can AI agents visually comprehend quantum circuit diagrams and generate verified executable code--and at what cost? We present Quantum Circuit Vision, a cost-aware evaluation framework for multimodal AI agents on quantum circuit visual understanding. We construct a 132-circuit benchmark spanning 13 categories (11--1010 qubits) with executable Amazon Braket code and unitary-fidelity verification. Evaluating three frontier Claude-family models at different capability-cost tiers with n=5n=5 repeated trials, we find that the mid-tier model (Sonnet 4.6, 1.30×1.30\times credits) offers the most favorable balance on the cost-accuracy frontier: 91% pass rate on the core subset at 18% of the per-call cost of the strongest model (Opus 4.6), whose accuracy advantage is not statistically significant (paired tt: p=0.083p=0.083). Logistic regression confirms that circuit depth--not qubit count--is the primary predictor of failure (p<0.001p<0.001). Chain-of-thought prompting shows no statistically significant effect (all p>0.18p>0.18, n=5n=5), suggesting that visual pattern recognition outweighs explicit reasoning strategy for structurally coupled diagrams. We propose a cascade routing strategy (cheap →\rightarrow expensive models) that achieves 84% accuracy at 38% of single-model cost, demonstrating that model routing dominates prompt engineering as a cost lever. We release QCV-Dataset (132 circuits, 5 modalities, 1,931 files) on Hugging Face Hub as an open evaluation infrastructure with structured metadata for discoverability, interoperability, and responsible AI documentation, and all evaluation code, cost logs, and verification scripts on GitHub for full reproducibility.