BioDCASE: Active Learning for Bioacoustics

Active learning is a promising framework for reducing annotation costs in large-scale bioacoustic monitoring, where expert labeling is expensive and data distributions are highly heterogeneous across environments. However, existing sample selection strategies often rely on static criteria that do not adapt to the evolving reliability of model predictions during training. This limitation can lead to suboptimal exploration-exploitation trade-offs and redundant sample selection. We propose an active learning strategy for multilabel bioacoustic event classification that jointly models predictive uncertainty, embedding-space diversity, and intra-batch redundancy. The method introduces an adaptive weighting scheme that progressively shifts from diversity-driven exploration in high-uncertainty regimes toward uncertainty-driven exploitation as the model becomes more confident, reflecting the increasing reliability of the classifier. To further improve annotation efficiency, a greedy Maximum Marginal Relevance (MMR) procedure is used to enforce diversity among selected samples within each acquisition batch. We evaluate the proposed approach within the BioDCASE 2026 Task 4 active learning framework on terrestrial (BirdSet) and marine (ATBFL) benchmarks using pretrained audio embeddings and a fixed annotation budget. Experimental results show consistent improvements in learning efficiency and competitive in terms of macro mean Average Precision (mAP) and Area Under the Learning Curve (AULC) across heterogeneous acoustic domains. The gains are particularly pronounced on structured terrestrial soundscapes, while performance remains competitive under noisier marine conditions. These findings demonstrate that adaptive acquisition strategies combining uncertainty estimation, embedding-space diversity, and redundancy-aware batch construction provide an effective and robust solution for [...].

Eco-acoustic monitoring generates vast volumes of audio data, making active learning a promising approach for reducing annotation effort while efficiently training reliable biodiversity classifiers. This report presents CARE-DPP, a batch active-learning acquisition method submitted to BioDCASE Active Learning for Bioacoustics 2026 challenge. The method combines class-balanced predictive uncertainty with embedding-space novelty, while a determinantal point process (DPP) objective selects a high-quality and non-redundant acquisition batch. The uncertainty-novelty balance is annealed over the annotation budget: early cycles emphasize geometric coverage, whereas later cycles increasingly exploit classifier uncertainty. To mitigate unreliable early scores, the DPP candidate pool mixes top-quality candidates with a decreasing proportion of random exploration. An adaptive acquisition schedule uses smaller batches early and larger batches later. Evaluated over five repeats on the BirdSet HSN, POW and UHH subsets and on ATBFL, CARE-DPP obtains a mean development AULC of 0.50 for macro mAP, compared with 0.46 for the official CoreSet baseline. Ablations identify DPP batch diversification and the adaptive acquisition schedule as the largest contributors.

Limited expert annotation capacity is a pervasive constraint in biodiversity monitoring. Passive acoustic recorders and camera traps generate data faster than experts can analyse them. Machine learning (ML) models can process these data at scale, but their reliability depends on the quality, quantity, and coverage of labelled samples, so expert time remains a constraint. Active learning (AL) eases this bottleneck by selecting, under a fixed annotation budget, the samples expected to improve a model most, and published evidence shows it can reduce the labels needed to reach a target performance. Monitoring programmes, however, face a broader question: how should a limited expert budget be divided so that model training, validation, and the ecological estimates built on model outputs all remain reliable? Because AL selects samples non-randomly, its labels are unsuitable for validation, calibration, or threshold selection, a tension rarely acknowledged. We synthesise AL research across acoustic and image modalities and identify gaps and opportunities. Most studies evaluate query strategies on pre-labelled benchmarks with simulated annotators; deployments in real monitoring workflows are rare and concentrate on birds and cetaceans. Bats, insects, amphibians, and fish are underrepresented, and multimodal applications remain largely unexplored. Evaluation centres on headline reductions in annotation effort, often without random-sampling baselines, per-class results, or calibration analysis, and rarely accounts for the labels required for validation. We provide a tutorial treatment of the AL loop that makes these budget decisions explicit, and a roadmap towards AL methods that support label-efficient training, validation, and trustworthy downstream ecological inference.