Scalability and Performance Evaluation of Federated Learning Frameworks: A Comparative Analysis
Authors: Bassel Soudan, Sohail Abbas, Ahmed Kubba, Manar Wasif Abu Talib, Qassim Nasir
Organizations: Department of Computer Engineering College of Computing and Informatics University of Sharjah Sharjah, UAE · Department of Computer Science College of Computing and Informatics University of Sharjah Sharjah, UAE
This paper presents a systematic examination and experimental comparison of the prominent Federated Learning (FL) frameworks FedML, Flower, Substra, and OpenFL. The frameworks are evaluated experimentally by implementing Federated Learning over a varying number of clients, emphasizing a thorough analysis of scalability and key performance metrics. The study assesses the impact of increasing client counts on total training time, loss and accuracy values, and CPU and RAM usage. Results indicate distinct performance characteristics among the frameworks, with Flower displaying an unusually high loss, FedML achieving a notably low accuracy range of 66% to 79%, and Substra demonstrating good resource efficiency, albeit with an exponential growth in total training time. Notably, OpenFL emerges as the most scalable platform, demonstrating consistent accuracy, loss, and training time across different client counts. OpenFL's stable CPU and RAM underscore its reliability in real-world scenarios. This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into the relative performance of FL frameworks, offering good understanding of their capabilities and providing guidance for their effective deployment across diverse user bases.
Federated Learning (FL) is experiencing a substantial research interest, with many frameworks being developed to allow practitioners to build federations easily and quickly. Most of these efforts do not consider two main aspects that are key to Machine Learning (ML) software: customizability and performance. This research addresses these issues by implementing an open-source FL framework named FastFederatedLearning (FFL). FFL is implemented in C/C++, focusing on code performance, and allows the user to specify any communication graph between clients and servers involved in the federation, ensuring customizability. FFL is tested against Intel OpenFL, achieving consistent speedups over different computational platforms (x86-64, ARM-v8, RISC-V), ranging from 2.5x and 3.69x. We aim to wrap FFL with a Python interface to ease its use and implement a middleware for different communication backends to be used. We aim to build dynamic federations in which relations between clients and servers are not static, giving life to an environment where federations can be seen as long-time evolving structures and exploited as services.
Performance evaluation is essential for assessing the quality of machine learning (ML) models and guiding deployment decisions. In federated learning (FL), assessing the performance is challenging because data are distributed across participants. Consequently, the coordinator must rely on locally computed evaluation metrics and aggregate them to assess the global model. A key challenge is that common aggregation strategies, such as weighted averaging based on the local samples per participant, do not always produce the same results as centralized evaluation. Existing definitions of performance evaluation are largely tailored to accuracy and do not generalize to other metrics, leading to inconsistencies between participant-based and centralized evaluation. However, such discrepancies are inconsistent with the FL objective and lead to a wrong calculation of the metric. To address this issue, we examine the underlying reasons for these discrepancies and propose FLAM, a performance evaluation method based on aggregatable measures that yields the same results as centralized evaluation without the need for a global test dataset.
Fabian Stricker, Jose A. Peregrina, David Bermbach +1
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for collaborative model training across distributed edge devices while preserving data privacy especially with the huge increase amount of data due to the adoption of technologies which contributes to the growing number of IoT devices. Storing this amount of data centrally is challenging due to issues like limited communication, privacy, and regulations. FL can be Centralized (CFL), Decentralized (DFL), and Semi-decentralized (SDFL). Choosing the right FL architecture depends on the application's needs. However, very few research studies have experimentally compared these three types of architectures to not only understand the respective strengths and limitations, but also trade-offs between different performance indicators. This paper overcome this lack of analysis, conducting experimental analyses using the Fedstellar simulator, MNIST dataset, and MLP classifier.