Beyond Distribution Matching: Semantics-Consistent Tabular Diffusion with Weak Semantic Priors
Authors: Yili Wang, Ruxue Shi, Mengnan Du, Hangting Ye, Yi Chang, Xin Wang
Organizations: School of Artificial Intelligence, Jilin University, Changchun, China · School of Artificial Intelligence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
Synthetic tabular data can match real data distributions while still violating the semantic constraints that govern valid tabular rows. This reveals a key limitation of existing tabular generators: they mainly optimize distributional fidelity, but do not explicitly model weak semantic priors encoded in tabular schema and textual descriptions. In this paper, we propose \ours, a semantics-consistent tabular diffusion framework for high-fidelity synthetic data generation under weakly specified semantic priors. \ours\ first constructs two types of priors, namely intra-column semantics and inter-column symbolic rules, with LLM-assisted extraction from metadata and validation on the real training split. These priors are then used as generation conditions rather than post-hoc filters. Specifically, \ours\ maps heterogeneous column values, column identities, and semantic priors into a unified semantic space, and performs column-wise forward corruption and prior-conditioned reverse denoising to preserve both marginal distributions and rule-consistent cross-column dependencies. Extensive experiments on six real-world tabular benchmarks show that \ours\ consistently improves distributional fidelity, semantic consistency, and downstream task utility over representative VAE-, GAN-, LLM-, and diffusion-based baselines. Additional analyses further demonstrate the robustness of \ours\ when semantic priors are partially unavailable.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: From Distributional Fidelity to Semantically Valid Tabular Generation.
Figure 2: An overview of SCTab-Diff.
Data
Metric
CTGAN
CTGAN+
TVAE
P-TA
TabDDPM
TABSYN
TABDIFF
SCTab-Diff
Beijing
Shape
80.59 1.18
89.30 6.15
79.32 1.40
88.07 0.27
64.01 30.05
85.24 0.06
98.35 0.28
98.56 0.20
Trend
80.38 0.62
77.96 5.60
81.67 1.68
76.44 2.89
58.56 31.97
76.32 0.03
96.26 0.23
97.09 0.05
SA
24.75 18.48
87.84 6.48
19.92 3.38
39.02 2.52
97.03 26.15
97.58 0.07
98.60 0.30
98.68 0.05
News
Shape
83.86 0.66
49.56 1.74
83.07 0.39
96.13 0.03
13.52 6.21
96.45 0.07
96.62 0.29
96.90 0.30
Trend
94.82 0.09
89.04 0.43
93.41 0.03
88.49 0.10
28.45 47.59
98.35 0.03
98.14 0.32
98.60 0.20
SA
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.76 0.04
1.42 1.17
1.24 0.02
Table 1: Data fidelity evaluation results. Shape(%) ↑ evaluates marginal distribution, while Trend(%) ↑ and SA(%) ↑ evaluate data fidelity. ↑ indicates that higher values are better. The best results are highlighted in bold, and suboptimal results are marked with an underline.
Data
Metrics
Real
Method SCTab-Diff
CTGAN
CTGAN+
TVAE
P-TA
TabDDPM
TABSYN
TABDIFF
Beijing
RMSE ↓
0.421 0.005
0.850 0.054
0.960 0.180
0.833 0.058
1.324 0.131
0.634 1.331
0.613 0.024
0.582 0.012
0.498 0.005
News
RMSE ↓
0.853 0.005
0.860 0.015
6.840 0.030
0.993 0.045
0.821 0.011
3.104 0.000
0.846 0.019
0.864 0.021
0.817 0.003
Shoppers
AUC ↑
0.924 0.100
0.880 0.740
0.881 1.412
0.885 2.024
0.913 0.543
0.814 18.364
0.888 0.763
0.923 0.214
0.932 0.201
Adult
AUC ↑
0.925 0.250
0.892 0.132
0.898 0.073
0.887 1.194
0.916 0.152
0.909 0.380
0.897 0.432
0.912 0.081
0.913 0.072
Default
AUC ↑
0.765 0.133
0.735 0.744
0.687 7.472
0.726 1.362
0.743 0.170
0.759 0.182
0.750 0.784
0.746 0.392
0.771 0.481
Table 2: MLE scores to evaluate downstream task availability. The best results are highlighted in bold, and suboptimal ones are marked with an underline.
Figure 3: Robustness to incomplete semantic priors on Beijing and Adult.
Key Components
Metrics
USS
ICS
ISR
Cw-FP
AUC
Shape
Trend
×
×
×
×
0.741 0.553
96.84 0.32
93.98 0.49
✓
×
×
×
0.752 0.523
97.18 0.35
95.21 0.48
✓
✓
×
×
0.763 0.483
97.56 0.31
95.94 0.55
✓
✓
✓
×
0.769 0.442
97.79 0.14
97.95 0.22
✓
✓
✓
✓
0.771 0.481
98.57 0.20
97.89 0.30
Table 3: Ablation results of key designs in SCTab-Diffon Default.
Figure 4: Visualization of categorical column fidelity on News and Shoppers.
Appendix figures & tables18 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
ht,i=h0,i+σρi(t)ϵi
Appendix
Algorithm 1 Training of SCTab-Diff
hT,i∼N(0,σρi2(T)I)
Appendix
Algorithm 2 Synthetic Tabular Data Generation of SCTab-Diff
Dataset
# Rows
# Num/Cat
# Train/Validation/Test
# Weak Semantic Priors
Task
Adult
48842
6/9
28943/3618/16281
3/13
Classification
Default
30000
14/11
24000/3000/3000
3/24
Classification
Shoppers
12330
10/8
9864/1233/1233
5/17
Classification
Magic
19019
10/1
15215/1902/1902
5/10
Classification
Beijing
43824
7/5
35058/4383/4383
5/11
Regression
News
39644
46/2
31714/3965/3965
10/47
Regression
Appendix
Table 4: Statistics of datasets. # Num/Cat stands for the number of numerical columns and the number of categorical columns, respectively. # Weak Semantic Priors for the number of Inter-Column Symbolic Rules and Intra-Column Semantics, respectively.
Stage
Input
Prompt Template
Constraint generation
Dataset metadata and column schema.
Given the following dataset metadata and column schema, identify semantic constraints that should be satisfied by valid tabular rows. Please extract both intra-column semantics and inter-column symbolic rules. Intra-column semantics describe valid value ranges, valid categories, non-negativity, ordinal meanings, or semantic types of individual columns. Inter-column symbolic rules describe logical dependencies between two or more columns. Please express each constraint as executable Python-style checking code. Do not introduce constraints that are not supported by the metadata or column definitions.
Natural-language conversion
Validated Python-style constraints and dataset metadata.
Given the dataset metadata and the validated Python-style constraints, convert the constraints into concise natural-language descriptions. Organize the output into three parts: Dataset Constraints, Intra-Column Semantics, and Inter-Column Symbolic Rules. Do not introduce new constraints. Use exact column names and preserve the meaning of the validated checking code.
Appendix
Table 5: Prompt templates used for LLM-based weak semantic prior construction.
Methods
Adult
Default
Shoppers
Magic
Beijing
News
Average
Ranking
CTGAN
78.61 1.85
68.48 0.39
78.42 3.32
83.25 0.91
96.12 1.48
97.00 1.03
83.65
5
CTGAN+
93.35 2.68
87.57 4.35
92.73 2.87
41.74 0.78
89.27 11.23
0.00 0.00
67.45
7
TVAE
96.71 1.67
84.11 1.76
62.29 7.40
82.90 0.92
90.58 5.51
89.40 8.92
84.33
4
TabDDPM
96.07 0.34
97.73 0.43
92.53 1.74
98.20 0.73
98.67 0.94
0.00 0.00
69.66
6
TABSYN
94.34 1.36
98.96 0.10
95.09 0.40
90.93 0.19
91.11 0.41
99.30 0.05
94.95
3
TABDIFF
99.41 0.34
98.38 0.47
99.28 0.49
99.32 0.34
98.59 0.10
92.83 2.25
97.97
2
Appendix
Table 6: Comparison of α -Precision scores. Bold Face represents the best score on each dataset and marks the suboptimal ones with an underline.
Methods
Adult
Default
Shoppers
Magic
Beijing
News
Average
Ranking
CTGAN
30.24 1.19
19.77 0.64
32.77 0.84
10.67 1.35
40.17 1.42
26.18 1.02
26.63
6
CTGAN+
29.64 7.37
21.59 11.59
17.23 3.02
0.17 0.02
41.65 1.99
0.00 0.00
18.38
7
TVAE
36.67 1.08
21.49 0.98
23.20 2.65
32.47 0.44
26.26 2.29
27.78 1.17
27.98
5
TabDDPM
48.72 0.75
47.16 0.82
54.13 0.74
47.57 0.93
19.13 0.87
0.00 0.00
36.12
3
TABSYN
33.24 0.33
39.54 0.26
38.66 0.94
17.22 0.08
20.34 0.15
44.47 0.04
32.25
4
TABDIFF
49.37 1.21
50.53 0.82
49.51 1.56
46.85 0.79
58.06 0.13
37.32 45.34
48.67
2
Appendix
Table 7: Comparison of β -Recall scores. Bold Face represents the best score on each dataset and marks the suboptimal ones with an underline.
Methods
Adult
Default
Shoppers
Magic
Beijing
News
CTGAN
0.644 0.054
0.639 0.025
0.711 0.014
0.681 0.014
0.774 0.078
0.695 0.059
CTGAN+
0.436 0.284
0.660 0.095
0.002 0.001
0.020 0.020
0.697 0.220
0.000 0.000
TVAE
0.703 0.057
0.545 0.034
0.297 0.020
0.821 0.031
0.694 0.058
0.441 0.023
TabDDPM
0.960 0.009
0.981 0.011
0.861 0.006
0.984 0.012
0.350 0.534
0.162 0.227
TABSYN
0.572 0.019
0.715 0.004
0.680 0.007
0.720 0.003
0.671 0.001
0.839 0.006
TABDIFF
0.967 0.012
0.949 0.008
0.959 0.029
0.970 0.007
0.960 0.007
0.925 0.029
Appendix
Table 8: Detection score (C2ST) using logistic regression classifier. Bold Face represents the best score on each dataset and marks the suboptimal ones with an underline.
Figure 5: The impact of Condition Guidance Level Parameters pu on MLE, SA, Shape, and Trend across the Adult, Magic, Beijing, and News datasets.
Metric
pu=0
pu=0.1
pu=0.2
pu=0.5
pu=0.9
Shape(%) ↑
99.12
98.82
98.56
98.04
97.31
Trend(%) ↑
97.43
97.46
97.49
96.72
95.84
SA(%) ↑
98.20
98.75
98.68
98.21
97.36
Appendix
Table 9: Effect of prior masking probability pu on data fidelity and semantic consistency. The main experiments use pu=0.2 .
Figure 6: Visualization of real and synthetic samples on the Adult dataset.
Figure 7: Visualization of intra-column distribution fidelity on Shoppers and News.
Figure 8: Visualization of inter-column dependency preservation on Shoppers and News.
Existing approaches for synthetic tabular data generation are based on either purely generative models or LLMs, both of which struggle with data heterogeneity, logical consistency, rare-event coverage, and robustness in low-data regimes. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical hybrid top-down and bottom-up (H-TDBU) framework that decouples semantic structures from stochastic texture. In the top-down path, structure-driven logical constraints and cross-modal alignment rules are constructed, while in the bottom-up path, lightweight tabular generators are used to learn local statistical patterns from real data. The two paths are consolidated in a unified synthesis engine with an iterative feedback loop. We evaluate the framework on weak multimodal financial benchmarks combining tabular and sentiment-text data. Experimental results show that our H-TDBU approach improves train-synthetic-test-real performance over neural baseline methods while preserving semantic consistency. Our results suggest that hierarchical rule-guided synthesis provides an effective mechanism for combining controllability, semantic coherence, and statistical fidelity in synthetic data generation.
Deep generative models can help with data scarcity and privacy by producing synthetic training data, but they struggle in low-data, imbalanced tabular settings to fully learn the complex data distribution. We argue that striving for the full joint distribution could be overkill; for greater data efficiency, models should prioritize learning the conditional distribution P(y∣X), as suggested by recent theoretical analysis. Therefore, we overcome this limitation with ReTabSyn, a Reinforced Tabular Synthesis pipeline that provides direct feedback on feature correlation preservation during synthesizer training. This objective encourages the generator to prioritize the most useful predictive signals when training data is limited, thereby strengthening downstream model utility. We empirically fine-tune a language model-based generator using this approach, and across benchmarks with small sample sizes, class imbalance, and distribution shift, ReTabSyn consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Moreover, our approach can be readily extended to control various aspects of synthetic tabular data, such as applying expert-specified constraints on generated observations.
Xiaofeng Lin, Seungbae Kim, Zhuoya Li +3
University of California, Los Angeles, USA · University of South Florida, USA · Cisco, USA +1
What determines the quality of a tabular foundation model? Unlike language or vision, tabular foundation models acquire their inductive biases almost entirely from synthetic pretraining distributions, yet the design of these distributions remains poorly understood. Standard synthetic priors are too well-behaved: they omit the irregularities and failure modes that determine deployment robustness. We introduce O'Prior, a compositional realism prior built around four coupled components: a hierarchical SCM meta-generator spanning diverse functional families; a modular realism engine covering heterogeneous marginals, missingness, and target transforms; an explicit stress module injecting confounding and support-query mismatch; and a curriculum-governed, leakage-safe generation protocol. To isolate prior design as the scientific variable, we hold architecture, optimizer, and compute budget fixed and vary only the synthetic task distribution. O'Prior yields consistent and substantial improvements in downstream accuracy and robustness across real tabular benchmarks, with gains concentrated in regimes characterized by distributional irregularities. Ablations confirm that mechanism diversity, realism composition, and shift-aware stress each contribute independently, their effects are not interchangeable. These results establish synthetic prior construction as a first-order and largely overlooked determinant of tabular foundation model quality.