Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Space Robot Operations: Technologies, Challenges and Prospects

In robot learning, scaling training datasets across diverse embodiments and environments has become a dominant paradigm for learning generalizable robot policies. These policies are commonly trained via behavior cloning to imitate actions from pre-collected demonstrations. However, since robot actions are tied to the dynamics of the data collection robot, different robots may require different actions to achieve the same motion. This discrepancy hinders both policy training and deployment across diverse robots. To address this, we propose using Cartesian state delta as a universal action representation across robots, and introduce State Prediction and Adaptive Command Execution (SPACE) framework. SPACE handles robot dynamics variation at three levels: across different embodiments, across hardware units of the same embodiment, and within a single robot during operation. It consists of two components: (i) a Cartesian state delta policy that predicts geometric end-effector displacement, and (ii) Action Adapter, which converts the predicted Cartesian state delta into robot-specific control commands. Experiments show that SPACE substantially outperforms policies that directly predict control commands when learning from data collected across different embodiments and across hardware units of the same embodiment. SPACE also remains robust under dynamics shifts at deployment, including changes in control frequency, object weight, and controller gains. The project page is available at http://haeone.site/space-website/.

While AI holds the potential to revolutionize space life sciences, realizing this promise is contingent upon the systematic restructuring of heterogeneous spaceflight biological data into machine-actionable, AI-ready forms. Even though open access principles support human reuse and scientific reproducibility, this does not necessarily enable AI systems to access and analyze such a diverse set of scientific datasets. In addition, the growing array of AI approaches places distinct demands on data structure, metadata, and access interfaces. In order to respond to such growing changes we propose a three-tier approach, proceeding from FAIR to AI-ready to space-ready data. We discuss existing infrastructures and how they can be improved to close the AI access gap. We conclude by proposing a neutral international coordinating body as the governance backbone for the trustworthy, agent-accessible space biology infrastructure that deep space biological research will require.

Embodied AI systems are increasingly expected to reason and act over extended horizons in physical environments. This growing capability brings safety to the foreground, because failures in the physical world can harm people, damage objects, and disrupt workplaces. Although safe embodied AI has attracted substantial attention, the literature remains fragmented across planning, policy design, and runtime execution. Long-horizon robotic manipulation is a particularly revealing anchor domain for this problem because semantic misgrounding, subtask-level error propagation, execution drift, and contact-rich physical risk can accumulate within the same closed-loop system. This survey therefore provides a structured review of safety in long-horizon robotic manipulation from an embodied AI perspective. We organize the literature by intervention locus, covering planning-time, policy-time, and execution-time safety, and we analyze the strength of the evidence that each line of work provides, distinguishing formal guarantees, statistical support, and empirical safety heuristics. This framework clarifies the distinct roles of backbone capability papers, direct safety mechanisms, and benchmark or evaluation studies, while exposing where current safety claims are well supported and where they remain indirect. We identify persistent gaps, including limited evidence for policy-time safety, weak formal support for contact-rich long-horizon manipulation, immature uncertainty-triggered intervention, and a shortage of manipulation-specific safety benchmarks. We conclude by outlining research directions for cross-layer assurance, evaluation design, and safer deployment of long-horizon robotic agents in real-world settings.