When the Gradient Sees Rank: Provable Necessity, Causal Recruitment, and Composition in Trained Matrix Memories

Matrix-valued memories make rank the natural budget of a learned representation: the number of independent directions a state spans bounds what it can bind, compose, and track. We report causal evidence, on a group-composition testbed trained under a hard single-state bottleneck with a fixed decoder that cannot launder rank, that gradient descent recruits precisely the rank the task's algebra demands. A companion paper [Larson, 2026a] establishes the analogous recruitment and causal necessity pattern on a $K$-pair associative-binding testbed, where exact recovery provably requires state rank at least $K$; this paper inherits that instrument and extends the rank law from a scalar capacity bound to a representation-theoretic one. We train toward chosen minimal faithful reference representations embedded in larger matrices. On group-composition state tracking over five finite groups spanning the solvable/non-solvable divide, the recruited rank equals the group's minimal faithful real representation dimension $d_{\min}$ (Spearman $ρ= 0.9747$, the design's tie-capped maximum), the dimension-matched solvable/non-solvable pair $S_4$/$A_5$ is statistically equivalent under a pre-registered test, and a pre-registered force-rank test separates a guaranteed similarity ceiling from empirical recovery at the target dimension: one rank below $d_{\min}$, cosine similarity is capped by the target's tied unit spectrum at $\sqrt{(d_{\min}{-}1)/d_{\min}} \le 0.894$, below the $0.9$ threshold in every group by construction, with observed cells at 86-95% (mean 91%) of that ceiling; at $d_{\min}$, not guaranteed a priori, recovery clears the pre-registered anchor-relative bar at four seeds per group in all five groups. Within this testbed, measured effective rank tracks representation dimension; the matched-dimension $S_4$/$A_5$ comparison establishes equivalence within the pre-registered tolerance.

Fixed-size recurrent memory limits storage growth during inference, but successful recall depends on the task and training. We study a small DeltaNet variant with fixed token-specific key biases, trained to remember 32 new key-value pairings per sequence. With 32 KiB of recurrent matrix state, it achieves 99.95% mean accuracy across three training seeds when choosing among the sequence's values. Recall remains near perfect when filler extends the pre-query context to 1,798 tokens without adding pairings. Zeroing the first memory block removes this recall. An exploratory 48-pair test remains near chance after one quarter of the primary training budget and does not locate a capacity limit. Parameter-matched vector and Transformer baselines remain near chance, including the Transformer after additional training searches. This unresolved baseline failure prevents a memory-efficiency comparison.

Continuous chain-of-thought models compress reasoning into latent tokens. Matrix-valued variants, which route each latent token through a d x d matrix bottleneck, introduce rank as a single-sample structural observable on the latent matrix Z. If matrix latents carry parallel reasoning paths via superposition, rank should track them, and truncating Z to low rank should hurt accuracy on tasks whose solutions plausibly require multiple components. Across four training regimes of a matrix-CODI model (three on ProsQA, one on GSM8K-Aug below the learning threshold), the rank-k projection ablation curve is flat to within 0.6 percentage points. A three-seed replication yields 81.0 +/- 2.0 percentage points accuracy while the final effective rank of Z spans {4, 12, 13}; the loss does not reward any particular rank. To test whether rank-blindness arises from the flatten-then-project readout alone, we trained four readouts: a bilinear reparametrization, a bilinear-plus-GELU readout nonlinear in Z, an SVD-augmented readout feeding singular values through an MLP, and a quadratic readout in Z Z^T. All four rank-k curves remain flat (Spearman p-values 0.63, 0.14, 0.82, 0.46). The flat curves persist for readouts nonlinear in Z. A linear probe on Z underperforms a raw pretrained hidden state at target prediction (AUC 0.673 vs. 0.846). A negative control on vanilla GPT-2 SFT (no matrix bottleneck, no Z, three seeds, n=500) reproduces a flat rank-k curve under the same intervention paradigm with pooled-mean range 0.20pp, and a random-h sensitivity floor lands at the same accuracy: the rank-k ablation alone conflates rank-blindness with position-irrelevance.