Making Political Text Scaling Comparable: Infrastructure and Hyperparameter Sensitivity for 17 Algorithms

Ideal point estimation is widely used to analyze and visualize political data. However, selecting the corresponding spatial model involves various trade-offs: while model-based approaches such as Item Response Theory (IRT) are based on utility functions rather than optimized for predictive accuracy, most Machine Learning (ML) alternatives struggle to generalize beyond training data when embedding sparse test responses. We introduce IXPLORE, a bounded ideal point estimation algorithm that combines a predictive fit objective with a sparsity-aware likelihood function. On five benchmark datasets spanning surveys, roll calls, and deliberation, this approach surpasses model-based and ML-based algorithms on reconstruction and imputation error - especially for users with sparse responses. Furthermore, we show that non-linear feature transforms can further reduce the reconstruction error while remaining visually interpretable. To quantify uncertainty, IXPLORE applies grid-based posterior inference on a bounded 2D latent space. Available as a Python package on PyPI, IXPLORE offers a flexible framework for constructing bounded, interpretable political maps with fast inference and strong imputation performance.

Large Language Models are increasingly deployed as information intermediaries, yet measuring their political behavior remains fragile because questionnaire results mix model dispositions with measurement artifacts and response-elicitation biases. We introduce a robust Political Compass Test evaluation framework that samples 300 configurations across an eight-dimensional perturbation space varying language, framing, instructions, answer format, option order, and persona wording. We evaluate eight Gemma 3 and Qwen 3 models across 14 languages and three quantization levels, obtaining design-averaged political coordinates with quantified uncertainty. Most models lean Libertarian-Left on average, but instruction phrasing, language, and answer format significantly affect recovered coordinates. Cross-lingual differences primarily reflect coordinate drift rather than distinct cultural reasoning. Reverse-engineering the test also exposes axis-weighting imbalances and the collapse of degenerate responses toward the center, so near-origin estimates for the smallest models can reflect weak signal rather than centrism. Free-text reasoning and chat-then-classify elicitation alter recovered coordinates, and larger models show clearer persona separation, with a specific failure of the Authoritarian-Left persona to move most models in the intended social direction. In downstream tasks, persona effects are modest relative to model size and target group for hate-speech detection, while base and centrist prompts give the highest agreement for topic-level sentiment. Political role prompting therefore has measurable but task- and dataset-specific downstream effects.

Text scaling, the task of positioning political actors on an ideological scale, is a fundamental task in political analysis. To ease the need for manual analysis, various NLP methods have been proposed for this task, including classification- and regression-based approaches, showing successes as well as limitations. The goal of our paper is to consolidate the state of the art in this area. We ask two questions: (a) Can the performance of scaling methods be improved by predicting scales not individually but jointly? (b) Is there a middle ground between classification and regression?