cs.CLSep 16, 2026

Planning or Improvisation? Stress-Testing the Poetry Planning Site on Open Models and Open Cross-Layer Transcoders

Authors: Éric Jacopin

Abstract

Lindsey et al. (2025) report that Claude 3.5 Haiku plans rhymes: features for candidate rhyme words are active on the newline before a line is written, and a suppress-and-inject intervention redirects the line only when applied there (their Figure 13). We test how far this generalizes on seven cells crossing four open models (0.6B to 2.6B parameters) with six open cross-layer transcoders (CLTs), on one consumer GPU, decomposing the claim into position specificity (C1), newline site identity (C2), and a newline-resident plan (C3). This is a stress test rather than a faithful reproduction: attribution graphs are unavailable for these CLTs, so features are found bottom-up from decoder vectors. C1 generalizes, in every cell and in all 247 of 444 prompt-by-inject pairs with a detectable effect, but the effective position is the final prompt token, adjacent to emission, and only two cells reach behaviorally meaningful probabilities. C2 and C3 are not recovered by any probe: a census of every active feature finds no rhyme-anticipating enrichment at the newline, and steering the newline while the model composes the whole line, over 36 runs and 8,640 sampled lines, shows why. That intervention is strong but one token long, making the injected word the first word of the composed line in 703 of 720 samples and leaving the rhyme six words later untouched. A final test drops the transcoder entirely: patching the newline's whole residual, at every layer, from a minimal-pair poem whose third line ends on a different rhyme moves the rhyme in 11 of 1,260 composed lines against 4 at baseline, with a design resolving 1.4%. We read this as a boundary condition rather than a refutation: at this scale and with these transcoders, the causal site is emission-adjacent. We reproduce Figure 13's shape, not its mechanism. Code and data are public (code: github.com/PCfVW/poetry-planning-site).

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 8, 2026cs.LG

Where's the Plan? Locating Latent Planning in Language Models with Lightweight Mechanistic Interventions

We study planning site formation in language models -- where internal representations of structurally-constrained future tokens form during the forward pass, and whether they causally drive generation. Using rhyming-couplet completion as a clean test of forward-looking constraint, we apply two lightweight methods (linear probing and activation patching) across Qwen3, Gemma-3, and Llama-3 at more than ten scales. Probing shows that future-rhyme information is linearly decodable at the line boundary, with signal that strengthens with scale in all three families. Activation patching reveals that only Gemma-3-27B causally relies on this encoding, exhibiting a handoff in which the causal driver migrates from the rhyme word to the line boundary around layer 30. Every other model we test conditions on the rhyme word throughout generation, with near-zero causal effect at the line boundary despite strong probe signal. We localize the Gemma-3-27B handoff to five attention heads through two-stage path patching that recover ~90% of the rhyme-routing capacity at the newline.
Nicole Ma, Nick Rui
Planning MethodsCausal Reasoning
AskPDF
May 28, 2026cs.AI

Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet

We demonstrate that sparse autoencoders can extract interpretable features from Claude 3 Sonnet, a production-scale language model, addressing the open question of whether dictionary learning methods scale beyond small transformers. We trained sparse autoencoders with up to 34 million features on the model's middle layer residual stream, using scaling laws to guide hyperparameter selection. The resulting features are multilingual and multimodal (generalizing to images despite text-only training), respond to both concrete instances and abstract discussions of concepts, and can be used to steer model behavior in ways consistent with their interpretations. We find features corresponding to famous entities and locations, as well as more abstract concepts like sarcasm or errors in code. We also identify features relevant to ways in which language models might cause harm--including features representing deception, power-seeking, sycophancy, and bias--and show that these causally influence model outputs when manipulated. Additionally, we conduct analyses of feature interpretability, geometry, and computational function. However, significant limitations remain: our suite of features is incomplete, and we lack rigorous methods for evaluating whether our features faithfully capture model computations.
Adly Templeton, Tom Conerly, Jonathan Marcus +23
Sparse Autoencoder FeaturesModel InterpretabilitySemantic RepresentationsLarge LanguagePoetry
AskPDF
Sep 20, 2026cs.CL

HaikuS2S: A Cascaded System For Responding In Verse

Expressive speech synthesis has advanced through prosody modeling, yet generating structured poetic speech, such as haiku, remains challenging. Prior work on prosody transfer improves expressiveness, and fine-tuned poetry TTS (text-to-speech) systems capture verse intonation. However, these models do not model haiku's 5-7-5 syllable structure or line-ending pauses. We present a cascaded system, HaikuS2S, combining ASR (automatic speech recognition), LLM (large language model)-generated haiku, and TTS fine-tuning on both prose and custom haiku datasets. Our evaluation focuses on emotion similarity, speech quality, and prosody alignment. In our experiments, we see that our prosody and tonal alignment improve significantly with our fine-tuned systems, particularly the one trained on both general poetry and haiku. We also see that we maintain similar emotion similarity scores across all systems.
Devangi Sharma, Sophia Judicke, Glenda Tan +2
Zero-Shot Text-To-Speech
AskPDF