Question answering has advanced rapidly with large language models, but predominantly for high-resource languages, in both text and spoken settings. Spoken question answering (SQA) benchmark for Telugu remains unexplored, and the reliability of automatic evaluation in this setting remains unquantified. We introduce VākQA, a Telugu SQA benchmark of 2,001 factoid question-answer pairs across six domains, with 2.53 hours of speech audio, bilingual transcriptions, and human-verified reference answers. We first validate evaluation methods against human judgements: Gemini-as-a-judge best approximates human ratings but is non-uniformly strict, while open-weight judges systematically penalize correct Telugu answers that differ in surface form from the reference. Using this validated setup, we benchmark proprietary and open-weight models across input modality, language, and domain. We observe that Telugu phrasing retains cultural specificity that is lost in translation, speech input introduces phonetic confusions that alter question meaning, and cascaded ASR-MT errors compound progressively. VākQA is publicly released.
Spoken Question Answering (SQA) remains largely focused on high-resource languages and carefully recorded speech, limiting the reach of speech-LLM methods in low-resource settings. This paper investigates whether text-to-speech (TTS) can provide task-specific training data for Luxembourgish SQA without requiring a large human-recorded QA corpus. Starting from existing text-based QA resources, we translate questions into Luxembourgish, synthesize spoken questions with multiple TTS systems, and pair them with textual answers. We train a parameter-efficient SLAM-style architecture that connects a frozen Whisper encoder to frozen multilingual LLM backends through a learned projector and LoRA adapters. We compare MMS-TTS, Qwen3-TTS, and OmniVoice variants, including single-source corpora of about 48k questions and a 4TTS multi-source mix of approximately 230k questions. Evaluation on LLAMA-LB-Test with two real Luxembourgish speaker conditions shows that multi-source and voice-design-based synthetic training configurations yield the strongest SQA performance. The results also show that no-reference TTS quality scores do not monotonically predict downstream QA performance, indicating that synthetic speech must be evaluated as task-specific training data rather than only as natural-sounding audio.
Nina Hosseini-Kivanani, Marco Matassoni, Alessio Brutti
Spoken language models (SLMs) unify speech perception and reasoning, but adapting them to sensitive domains is underexplored, especially when the original training data is inaccessible and the use case demands multilingual, spoken-query interaction. We adapt an open-source SLM to the Singaporean Home Team context across five speech tasks in Singapore's four official languages, combining LoRA fine-tuning, a surrogate text-QA dataset that guards against catastrophic forgetting, and a multi-task objective that adapts the CoBa reweighting scheme to speech. We also build HTD-multilingual-QA, a 504,853 sample multilingual QA dataset in text and spoken form. The resulting HT-Moonstone (5B) matches or outperforms SLMs up to 7x its size on most tasks, attains the best accent and gender recognition among all models evaluated, and loses under 2% of its original speech QA ability.
Existing audio question answering benchmarks largely emphasize sound event classification or caption-grounded queries, often enabling models to succeed through shortcut strategies, short-duration cues, lexical priors, dataset-specific biases, or even bypassing audio via metadata and captions rather than genuine reasoning Thus, we present AUDITA (Audio Understanding from Diverse Internet Trivia Authors), a large-scale, real-world benchmark to rigorously evaluate audio reasoning beyond surface-level acoustic recognition. AUDITA comprises carefully curated, human-authored trivia questions grounded in real-world audio, designed to stress robust auditory reasoning through challenging distractors and long-range temporal dependencies, using probing queries that cannot be answered from isolated text or sound cues alone. Human average accuracy of 32.13% shows both the challenge of the task while demonstrating meaningful comprehension of the audio. In stark contrast, state of-the-art audio question answering models perform poorly, with average accuracy below 8.86%. Beyond raw accuracy, we apply Item Response Theory (IRT) to estimate latent proficiency, question difficulty, and expose systematic deficiencies of the models and data.