Abstract
Pronouns, adverbs and other functional words (such as they, her, somewhere, there) are often used in language to replace concrete nouns or phrases, when their properties - such as gender, grammatical number - provide sufficient information for the given context. Do pretrained transformer models encode such functional words in a manner that allows them to be used like humans do? Can language models recognize the syntactic and semantic parallelism of sentences such as "The researchers wrote the paper" and "They wrote it", which relies on such lexical abstraction? We map these linguistic questions into the embedding space of a pretrained transformer model, and compare representations of nouns, with the representations of the pronouns and adverbs that can replace these nouns, in isolation and in parallel lexicalized and functional sentences. We then probe for shared syntactic and semantic structure in the embeddings of parallel lexicalized and functional sentences. We find that functional words are located centrally compared to nouns, but are also distinct, which is congruent with their behaviour as place-holders in a wide variety of contexts. The analysis of the embeddings of parallel (lexicalized and functional) sentences show them inhabiting different subspaces of the embedding space. Experiments that distil the structural information of the sentence show that training on either type of data does not reveal the shared structure - because of the over-consistency of the vocabulary (in case of the functional data), and the too much variety (in case of the lexicalized versions). However, training with a mix of functional and lexicalized sentences, the shared structure emerges.
Explore similar work
Aug 3, 2026cs.CL
In this work we investigate how decoder-only transformers resolve lexical ambiguity through layer-by-layer analysis of three models spanning three parameter sizes (GPT-2-Small-117M, Llama-3.2-3B, Qwen2.5-32B). For both homonyms and polysemes, we find that representations become maximally distinct in middle layers, then partially reconverge in late layers, while the KL divergence between their next-token predictions reaches its maximum in the final layers. The activation patching experiment provides causal evidence that late-layer representational differences directly determine outputs despite apparent increased similarity in embedding space. Our single-layer ablation experiment indicates that models achieve equivalent disambiguation despite qualitatively different layer-wise vulnerabilities. These findings offer a mechanism for recent observations where models' internal embedding similarities show low correlation with their behavioural outputs despite strong performance. The semantic distinctions therefore remain present but become increasingly invisible to similarity measures over the embeddings, with implications for embedding-based methods such as semantic search, retrieval, and clustering that rely on late-layer cosine similarity.
K. Jack Scott, Narun Pat, Veronica Liesaputra
Jan 9, 2026cs.CL
We present a systematic review of 337 articles evaluating the syntactic abilities of Transformer-based language models (TLMs), reporting on over 3,000 datapoints spanning a wide range of syntactic phenomena, languages, models, and methods. We take the data to collectively show that TLMs encode a non-trivial amount of syntactic knowledge. Behavioral evidence shows strong performance on formal syntactic phenomena, but weaker and more variable performance on phenomena at the syntax-semantics interface. Performance is also consistently lower for languages with less digital support. Probing and mechanistic studies further support the presence of syntactic knowledge in TLMs. Yet, because most work remains observational and methodologically heterogeneous, insight into the detailed computational mechanisms underlying syntactic processing remains limited. At the same time, the literature remains heavily concentrated on English and BERT-like models. We discuss the implications of our results and provide recommendations for future research.
Nora Graichen, Iria de-Dios-Flores, Gemma Boleda
Sep 9, 2026cs.CL
Reading a transformer's internal states in token space is easy to do and hard to trust: a logit lens on a single hidden state is dominated, at intermediate layers, by the generic tokens the model would predict for almost any input. We read the difference instead. Subtracting two closely matched prompts' hidden states and projecting through the unembedding cancels the shared component and surfaces what separates them, an operation equivalent to reading a RepE/ActAdd steering vector through a logit lens. Built into a training-free tracer that reads at every position, sub-layer, and head and averages over designed baselines, it traces a compound- noun MLP->attention chain in Phi-2, confirmed there by activation patching, with the same distinction recovered across three architectures by readout and probe rather than by patching; it reads what retrieval surfaces for real versus fictional entities, and reads metaphor as a set of domain-to-domain mappings rather than a single figurativity feature. A cross-seed control marks the boundary: across five networks differing only in initialization, the same distinction surfaces as almost entirely different tokens (top-10 overlap 0.08). What a computation looks like in token space is network-specific; the distinction it draws is not
Olli Tuomi