An improved periodic activation for PINNs reconstructing convective flows

Convection-dominated convection-diffusion problems often develop thin layers, where the solution has sharp transition profiles and its derivatives are highly localized. This creates a structural mismatch for standard physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), whose trial spaces are not designed to match the value--derivative structure of such layers. We propose a Layer-Resolving XNet Physics-Informed Neural Network (LRX-PINN) based on integrated Cauchy activations. The proposed basis is transition-type at the solution level, while its derivative recovers a localized Cauchy kernel. We show that this structure matches the scaling of convection-dominated layers, inherits the Cauchy approximation mechanism at the derivative-profile level, and identifies $d/\|w\|$ as the effective physical width of a ridge neuron. For analytic layer profiles, this yields derivative-stable exponential approximation in the stretched coordinate and a layer-scaled estimate for the strong residual of the singularly perturbed operator. Numerical experiments on several convection-dominated benchmarks show that LRX-PINN achieves higher accuracy than PIKAN and Fourier-feature PINNs while using less than $30\%$ of their trainable parameters. On more challenging benchmarks, embedding the proposed representation into hp-VPINN-based frameworks further improves the best results obtained by existing hp-VPINN-based baselines without changing their original loss functionals or stabilization strategies. These results show that neural representations aligned with layer structure provide a compact and effective approach for convection-dominated problems.

Partial differential equations (PDEs) often have high-frequency and multi-scale features that neural networks struggle to approximate. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) build the governing equations directly into training, but suffer from spectral bias: they learn low-frequency components faster than high-frequency ones. Techniques such as Fourier feature embeddings and sinusoidal activations address this, but most studies assume they help across the board without checking which spectral regimes actually benefit. We introduce a dual-branch, spectrally-gated architecture (DBSG-PINN) that splits low- and high-frequency components into separate subnetworks joined by an adaptive gate, and use it to run a partially controlled ablation of frequency decomposition and spectral routing. We test this on five one-dimensional benchmark PDEs, ranging from smooth, single-scale problems to oscillatory, multi-scale ones. Frequency decomposition helps most on the spectrally complex benchmarks, cutting relative $L_2$ error by up to $59.2\%$ on a multimodal wave problem, but gives little benefit on smoother PDEs. On one benchmark (1D Wave), it performs substantially worse than a simpler fixed-combination variant. The gate's benefit scales with how spectrally rich the target solution is: the full model's advantage over the ablations is largest on multi-scale benchmarks and smallest (or negative) on single-scale ones, consistent with the gate exploiting frequency structure rather than acting as noise,though we do not directly visualize or quantify its spatial activations in this study. All results come from a single training seed across five 1D benchmarks, so we present this as an exploratory study meant to raise questions rather than answer them, and outline the additional seeds and benchmarks needed to test whether the pattern holds.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) embed governing partial differential equations directly into the training loss, offering a promising alternative to costly CFD solvers for unsteady flows. Yet the growing list of techniques proposed to improve PINN training is typically validated one at a time, leaving open whether these techniques actually compose. We study this question in depth on the DFG/Schafer-Turek unsteady cylinder wake benchmark. In isolation, nearly every technique performs no better than an untreated baseline. However, combining periodic (SIREN) activations with causal weighting unlocks a previously inaccessible regime, reconstructing velocity and pressure fields to within 4.1% average relative L2 error against an OpenFOAM reference solution. Adding further techniques instead causes catastrophic performance degradation, demonstrating that individually effective PINN interventions can interact nonlinearly and that more elaborate training recipes are not necessarily better.