eess.SPSep 1, 2026
SaveAn Implant-to-Wearable IR-UWB Transmitter-Receiver Architecture and Layered Protocol for High-Density Brain-Computer Interfaces
Organizations: Hangzhou Dianzi University · BroadLink Co., Ltd.
Abstract
High-rate neural telemetry requires an implant-towearable link whose circuit partition, waveform mapping, packet processing, and failure semantics are mutually consistent. This paper specifies a chip-oriented, one-way impulse-radio ultrawideband (IR-UWB) uplink comprising an implanted packet engine and free-running transmitter, a tissue-proxy channel, and a wearable mixed-signal receiver and digital baseband.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: System-level application context for the implant-to-wearable IR-UWB transmitter–receiver architecture. Multiple high-density neural interfaces feed an implanted recording and telemetry SoC; the wearable receiver recovers the layered neural-data stream and forwards it to a host. The use case follows recent neural IR-UWB research [ 9 , 5 ] ; the artwork and technical partition are original.
Fig. 2: End-to-end chip-oriented partition of the one-way implant-to-wearable uplink. The implant RO, selected-phase edge-combining, pulse-generation, and PA organization is adopted from Lei et al. [ 9 ] ; the packet/lane interfaces, wearable receiver partition, decoder flow, and cross-layer service semantics are specified in this work. W1 3/5-cycle PWM is shown as the baseline programmable width profile. The tissue blocks denote a synthetic channel boundary, not an anatomical or measured propagation model.
Fig. 3: Normalized simulated TX power spectral density. The shaded 3.1–10.6-GHz region is frequency-allocation context only. The curves are not in dBm/MHz and do not establish FCC-mask compliance, radiated power, antenna efficiency, or a measured implant output spectrum.
Fig. 4: Wearable external-receiver partition. One envelope path supplies acquisition, timing, and Base-width evidence; one time-shared burst-I/Q path supplies optional differential-phase evidence. All templates and lane decisions are digital.
Fig. 5: Predictive NCO sampling window. Envelope evidence from an admitted observation corrects future windows; it does not reveal the transmitted event time to the runtime detector.
Fig. 6: Logical transmit modulation and receive demodulation flow. This original block diagram follows the paired modulator/demodulator presentation convention of [ 9 ] , while replacing its D16PPM hybrid modem with the present fixed-slot PWM Base lane (illustrated with the W1 3/5-cycle baseline), optional DBPSK Enhancement lane, predictive receive timing, soft LLRs, and explicit erasure/fallback path.
Fig. 7: Deterministic W1/M1 sample-domain modulation and demodulation example. Base bits select three- or five-cycle bursts; Enhancement bits update differential polarity; the synthetic receiver envelope and gated I/Q observations produce signed soft metrics. All amplitudes and metrics are normalized and no measured waveform is implied.
Fig. 8: Packet timeline and the independently verified Base and Enhancement lanes. Enhancement failure can produce labeled Base-only service but cannot be counted as strict complete delivery.
Fig. 9: WIDTH_TRAIN quality gating and conservative fallback. The frozen campaign reports gated and ungated online-template receivers separately, because rejecting difficult packets must not be mistaken for improved strict delivery.
| Dimension | Primary settings |
|---|---|
| Width profile | W1 (3/5 cycles), W3 (4/7 cycles) |
| PHY mode | M0, M1 |
| Nominal SNR | 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 dB |
| Payload FEC | Conv. , rate |
| Detector | Scalar, fixed, online, gated |
| Population | In-distribution and shifted hold-out |
TABLE I: Primary Held-Out Evaluation Matrix
Fig. 10: Renderer convergence. The selected 256-sample/symbol rate removes cycle slips in the convergence experiment and reduces sample-derived timing RMSE to 146 ps; residual Base-width BER is therefore not attributed to renderer synchronization failure. DBPSK phase-metric convergence is not evaluated by this figure.
Fig. 11: Synthetic tissue-proxy population distributions. These are generated statistical proxies, not human or animal measurements.
Fig. 12: Strict Complete PSR of the ungated online-template receiver. Error bars are 95% hierarchical cluster-bootstrap intervals. Nominal SNR is an integrated simulation reference, not TX power, RSSI, sensitivity, or range, and cannot be converted to those quantities without measured, jointly calibrated hardware and channel data.
| Condition | Header | Base | Enh. | Strict Complete [95% cluster CI] | Service | Goodput | Width BER |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID M0 W1 | 89.8 | 88.1 | – | 88.1 [85.9, 90.2] | 88.1 | 42.6 | 4.46 |
| ID M0 W3 | 78.2 | 75.4 | – | 75.4 [72.2, 78.5] | 75.4 | 36.4 | 5.99 |
| ID M1 W1 | 89.1 | 81.5 | 82.2 | 75.8 [70.0, 80.7] | 81.5 | 47.1 | 5.50 |
| ID M1 W3 | 79.0 | 70.2 | 75.6 | 68.3 [62.0, 73.7] | 70.2 | 42.0 | 7.08 |
| Shift M0 W1 | 69.4 | 66.1 | – | 66.1 [61.7, 70.5] | 66.1 | 31.9 | 11.01 |
| Shift M0 W3 | 56.8 | 53.0 | – | 53.0 [48.2, 57.7] | 53.0 | 25.6 | 13.00 |
TABLE II: Online-Template Held-Out Results at Nominal 18 dB
Fig. 13: Layer reachability for the online-template receiver at nominal 18 dB. Service can exceed strict Complete only when a verified Base lane is delivered with Enhancement explicitly missing. The nominal SNR is the internal simulation reference of ( 7 ), not a real-world link-budget point.
Fig. 14: Aggregate soft-information evidence. Negative mismatched-LLR information scores indicate harmful confidence scaling; they are retained rather than clipped from the evidence.
| Receiver | Ops/sym. | State B | PSR | Brier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scalar-width soft LLR | 18 | 32 | 21.7 | 0.173 |
| Fixed dual template | 280 | 512 | 16.2 | 0.224 |
| Online dual template | 320 | 1024 | 24.4 | 0.158 |
| Quality-gated online | 360 | 1152 | 21.6 | 0.174 |
TABLE III: Deployable Detector Complexity and Sweep-Aggregate Outcome
| Mode | SNR (dB) | Variant | Complete PSR (%) | Goodput (Mbit/s) | Model energy (nJ) | Latency ( s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | 12 | Baseline conv 1/2 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 2.088 | 3.974 |
| M0 | 12 | TBCC + fixed blind 2 | 85.0 | 16.54 | 5.146 | 9.867 |
| M0 | 12 | Repeated conv + fixed blind 2 | 92.2 | 11.90 | 7.880 | 14.881 |
| M0 | 15 | Baseline conv 1/2 | 85.4 | 41.27 | 2.088 | 3.973 |
| M0 | 15 | TBCC + fixed blind 2 | 100.0 | 19.46 | 5.145 | 9.866 |
| M0 | 15 | Repeated conv + fixed blind 2 | 100.0 | 12.90 | 7.879 | 14.879 |
TABLE IV: Robust reference sensitivity results at selected nominal SNR values.
| Width | SNR | Enh. BER (%) | LLR | Disagree. (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dB) | 256 | 512 | 256/512 | 256/512 | |
| W1 | 12 | 9.52 | 9.15 | 0.793 | 12.88 |
| W1 | 18 | 2.81 | 3.65 | 0.942 | 3.88 |
| W3 | 12 | 8.19 | 7.33 | 0.867 | 8.90 |
| W3 | 18 | 1.86 | 1.88 | 0.972 | 1.96 |
TABLE V: Paired DBPSK sampling-rate sensitivity.
| Parameter group | Frozen value or rule |
|---|---|
| Campaign | Hash 593f2287c9b49ead ; root seed 2026082699; 40 cells; 2000 packets/cell; 4000 cluster-bootstrap replicates; sequential stopping disabled. |
| Calibration | Hash 48cdcc968e591308 ; 250 training and 250 validation packets per algorithm; one immutable artifact applied to both final populations. |
| Renderer and AFE | 300-MHz symbol rate; 256 samples/symbol (76.8-Gsample/s numerical grid); 6-bit uniform I/Q quantization over ; causal one-pole 750-MHz front end; AGC target 0.35, gain range 0.25–512, frozen after 64 symbols. |
| Acquisition and timing | Acquisition correlation ; refined SFD correlation ; event peak/noise ; search half-window 0.75 ns; , ; timing-error clamp ; integration interval about the prediction. |
| Online width rows | 64 resampled envelope-power values; subtract row 20th percentile and clip below zero; direct valid-class means ( ); no per-row amplitude fit or sample weights. |
| Width statistic | Shape-distance normalization by ; pooled scalar-variance floor ; component clipping ; fusion ; final scale 2 and clipping . No separately calibrated is used. |
TABLE VI: Frozen campaign and receiver parameters used for the reported held-out results.
| Term | Distribution or deterministic rule | Sampling/correlation level |
| RO residual | ppm | One draw per packet; shared by every symbol. |
| Startup and drift | ppm with decay; ppm with linear packet ramp | Independent packet draws; correlated over symbols through the stated curves. |
| RO random walk | ppm/symbol and | Independent increments; accumulated within a packet. |
| Data pushing | ppm | Deterministic from the packet width sequence. |
| Timing/width perturbations | Boundary jitter ps; packet-shared width offset ps; per-symbol width jitter ps; RX-LO offset ppm | Independent draws except for the packet-shared width term; the RO state jointly sets symbol period, carrier offset, width, and accumulated phase. |
| ID proxy hierarchy | Cluster path loss dB; proxy increment dB; packet increment dB. Cluster RMS delay ns and proxy multiplier . | 32 final clusters, eight proxies/cluster; cluster and proxy terms recur, packet terms are redrawn. |
TABLE VII: Frozen stochastic RO and tissue-proxy model.
More in this topic
Wireless Communications
Wireless communications studies how information is sent over radio links and how networks manage signals, spectrum, and resources reliably.
See all 403 papersImplantable brain-computer interfaces require on-node spike sorting to reduce telemetry bandwidth and power while maintaining reliable neural decoding. This paper presents a hardware-oriented deep binarized neural network (DBNN) spike-sorting system with two binarized hidden layers with 256 neurons and a fixed-point output layer to enable multiplier-free inference dominated by sign-controlled accumulation and bit-wise logic. The proposed classifier operates on compact 16-sample spike waveforms to reduce the implementation cost (16-256-256-3) and achieves a median classification accuracy of 98.7% on both synthetic and in-vivo datasets. An FPGA prototype on a Cyclone V device operates at 50 MHz and requires 528 cycles per spike, corresponding to a 0.01 ms compute latency, while consuming 828 ALMs and 1023 registers with zero DSP blocks. For ASIC feasibility, the DBNN is implemented using FreePDK45-based flow; synthesis in Synopsys Design Compiler indicates an estimated silicon area of 0.014 mm2 and an operating power of 122 nW at 20 kHz under a 1.1 V supply. These results demonstrate that the proposed DBNN spike sorter offers a favorable trade-off between accuracy and implementation cost, supporting low-power, implantable neural interfaces. Overall, the proposed DBNN spike sorter achieves high accuracy (98.7%) with extremely low hardware cost (0.014 mm2, 122 nW at 20 kHz) and multiplier-free operation, making it suitable for low-power, implantable neural interfaces. This paper introduces the first DBNN designed for real-time neural spike sorting, striking an excellent balance between input data size and network complexity.
Spiking Personalized Federated Learning for Brain-Computer Interface-Enabled Immersive Communication
This work proposes a novel immersive communication framework that leverages brain-computer interface (BCI) to acquire brain signals for inferring user-centric states (e.g., intention and perception-related discomfort), thereby enabling more personalized and robust immersive adaptation under strong individual variability. Specifically, we develop a personalized federated learning (PFL) model to analyze and process the collected brain signals, which not only accommodates neurodiverse brain-signal data but also prevents the leakage of sensitive brain-signal information. To address the energy bottleneck of continual on-device learning and inference on energy-limited immersive terminals (e.g., head-mounted display), we further embed spiking neural networks (SNNs) into the PFL. By exploiting sparse, event-driven spike computation, the SNN-enabled PFL reduces the computation and energy cost of training and inference while maintaining competitive personalization performance. Experiments on real brain-signal dataset demonstrate that our method achieves the best overall identification accuracy while reducing inference energy by 6.46 compared with conventional artificial neural network-based personalized baselines.
SwitchBraidNet: Quantisation-Aware Lightweight Architecture for Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface
Hybrid brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that integrate motor imagery (MI) and steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) provide high-dimensional neural decoding but typically exceed the computational limits of embedded hardware. To address this, we propose SwitchBraidNet, a compact EEG classification architecture designed for low-power deployment. The model employs a dual-path temporal braid to extract multiscale oscillatory features, an adaptive squeeze-and-excitation spatial switch for electrode gating, and a log-variance readout layer for direct band-power encoding. Furthermore, through systematic quantisation-aware training on the OpenBMI dataset, we compared SwitchBraidNet against four established baselines across FP32, FP16, and INT8 precisions. Experimental results demonstrate superior efficiency and performance, achieving MI accuracy of 69.49% (FP16), SSVEP accuracy of 93.48% (FP32), and a hybrid information transfer rate of 64.82 bits/min (FP16). With an INT8 footprint of only 3.03 KB, SwitchBraidNet maintains high accuracy across varying numerical precisions, demonstrating its suitability for low-power embedded BCI deployment.