cs.AISep 18, 2026

GaitVista: Reliability-Aware AI Measurement toward Accessible Longitudinal Gait Assessment

Authors: Nethmi Jayasinghe, Mihir Parashar, Amit Ranjan Trivedi

Organizations: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. · Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, Aurora, IL, USA.

Abstract

Tracking recovery of walking function requires detecting meaningful gait change across rehabilitation sessions, yet objective 3D measurement remains confined to specialized motion-capture laboratories. Small camera sets and body-worn inertial sensors broaden access, but reliability varies across joints and time, allowing sensing failures to masquerade as patient change. We present \textsc{GaitVista}, a reliability-aware measurement layer whose lightweight gate assigns joint- and frame-specific visual contributions using camera coverage, local visual quality, cross-modal disagreement, and root-motion continuity, and exposes them for inspection. Across seven clean and degraded sensing conditions on TotalCapture, \textsc{GaitVista} reduces average full-body and lower-body error by \textbf{27.7%} and \textbf{27.8%}, attains the lowest worst-condition error among fusion methods, and reduces the gap to a joint-frame oracle from 2.762.76--5.335.33~cm for condition-blind baselines to 1.111.11~cm. On MoVi with image-derived keypoints, it is the only deployable fusion method to improve over both unimodal streams, reducing marker-supported error by \textbf{6.4%} relative to the strongest learned fusion baseline. On TotalCapture, it improves bilateral knee-flexion waveform accuracy by \textbf{18.9%}. Raw inertial measurements from five TotalCapture participants show location- and time-varying magnetic disturbance, supporting the design's reliability premise. Both benchmarks contain neurologically healthy participants in controlled settings and retain participant-specific IMU calibration; we therefore report progress toward accessible gait assessment, not validated clinical deployment.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Sep 28, 2026

Reliability-Gated Fusion of Consumer Head and Foot IMUs for Lower-Body 3D Pose

Sparse inertial pose estimation promises camera-free motion capture from consumer devices, but consumer sensors are unreliable: firmware-fused orientations are biased, mounting varies between sessions, and streams drift or drop out. On a new 35-take single-subject benchmark pairing an earbud head inertial measurement unit (IMU) with two smart-insole foot IMUs (SAM-3D-Body pseudo-ground-truth labels), we show the reliability problem is channel-level: a channel ablation isolates foot acceleration as the most informative input (66.6 mm vs. 79.0 mm head-only) and the firmware-fused foot orientation as the liability that destroys the gain. We therefore let the model learn how much to trust each channel of each stream: one temporal gate per stream per channel block, trained with an auxiliary reliability objective on synthetically corrupted pretraining data. The channel-gated model is the most accurate of our learned fusion arms on clean data (69.4 mm vs. 83.7 static, 86.6 ungated) and under every simulated fault (bias in training; drift, dropout eval-only); its gates suppress the natively biased foot-orientation channels on clean real data without test-time supervision and flag dropout bursts at 0.92-0.999 AUROC. Two contrasts: dropping a channel known a priori to fail is flat across foot faults but collapses when an unanticipated stream fails (head dropout: 92.9 vs. 79.3 mm); and a fine-tuned HMD-Poser is more accurate on clean data (64.4 mm) and nominally under drift, with no significant paired difference under bias or dropout, but a larger worst-case degradation from clean (+16.1 vs. +3.5 mm, single seed). Learning to gate reliability instead of sensor count is the lever for deployable sparse inertial capture. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhilinGuo/reliability-gated-imu-fusion.
Sep 10, 2026

MMGait: Benchmarking and Unifying Gait Recognition across Heterogeneous Modalities

Gait recognition is commonly studied using RGB videos or their derived silhouettes and poses. Yet human walking produces heterogeneous photometric, geometric, and motion cues that cannot be systematically examined with RGB-centered benchmarks. We present MMGait, a large-scale multi-sensor benchmark that brings visible, infrared, depth, LiDAR, and radar observations into sequence-level correspondence. It provides diverse modalities spanning appearance, contours, geometry, motion, and body structure. Under a shared impostor-augmented protocol, we evaluate single-modal recognition, cross-modal recognition via directed retrieval, and multi-modal recognition using task-specific experts. Across settings, modality rankings vary with probe conditions, cross-modal alignment remains difficult, and fusion often provides complementary gains. This analysis exposes a scalability problem: individual modalities, modality pairs, and fusion configurations are typically handled by separately trained experts. We formulate Omni-Modal Gait Recognition, which unifies single-modal, cross-modal, and multi-modal recognition within a shared identity space. OmniGait++ uses modality-specific front ends followed by a shared identity encoder to preserve modality-dependent cues while learning comparable identity descriptors. An anchor-guided fusion module aggregates modality subsets of varying size without frame-level synchronization. A jointly trained checkpoint covers all three recognition settings and accommodates modality subsets of different compositions and cardinalities. Experiments show OmniGait++ remains competitive with task-specific experts in many shared settings and extends to higher-cardinality fusion unavailable to fixed-pair models. The results establish MMGait as a common testbed for heterogeneous gait sensing and demonstrate the feasibility of unified recognition under varying modality availability.
Sep 23, 2026

DrGait: Biomechanically Grounded Visual Reasoning for Interpretable Clinical Gait Analysis

Current automated gait analysis for clinical applications relies on uninterpretable black-box classifiers. Although Vision-Language Models (VLMs) offer strong reasoning capabilities, applying them directly to gait videos often leads to hallucinations, because they struggle to measure subtle geometric deviations from raw visual contexts. To address this, we introduce DrGait, a training-free agentic framework that shifts the VLM's role from a direct visual reasoner to a clinical planner. DrGait decouples semantic reasoning from geometric perception through a structured Triage-Verification-Synthesis (TVS) workflow. Given an input video and a set of basic spatiotemporal metrics, the DrGait agent first performs a heuristic triage to propose diagnostic hypotheses, which are then verified by autonomously calling deterministic biomechanical tools that operate on reconstructed 3D mesh trajectories, segmented 2D pose tracks, and event-centered video evidence. Finally, a closed-loop mechanism recursively updates the agent's reasoning context based on the feedback. By anchoring VLM's reasoning in verifiable geometric and temporal measurements, DrGait reduces hallucinations, achieving competitive diagnostic accuracy while generating transparent and audit-ready clinical reports.