Scout: Open-World Species Recognition on the Edge

Camera traps often run in the field on edge hardware with limited or no connectivity, making small, locally-deployable vision-language models (VLMs) -- not frontier-scale ones -- the practically relevant class to evaluate for species identification. We test whether models in this deployment-relevant 2--8B range carry genuine taxonomic knowledge, evaluating four such VLMs (Qwen3-VL 2B/4B/8B, Gemma3 4B) against the domain-specific specialist BioCLIP (300M parameters) on a 96-species task, comparing clean iNaturalist photographs against camera-trap imagery from 6 LILA.science collections, on two independently-sampled evaluation sets. All models identify species far above chance, but every model -- general-purpose or specialist -- degrades sharply on field imagery (domain gaps of 9.6--26.6 percentage points, consistent across taxonomic levels and both evaluation sets), indicating the degradation reflects general image legibility rather than fine-grained discrimination failure. BioCLIP substantially outperforms every VLM tested (by 33.2--59.2 percentage points across an expanded 200-image sample for every model) despite its far smaller size, suggesting the gap reflects specialized training data rather than model scale; yet BioCLIP's own domain gap (18.0 points) is statistically indistinguishable from the best VLM's (22.3 points), suggesting the clean-to-field degradation itself is a property of the image-quality shift rather than a general-purpose-model weakness. Under open-set prompting, 5.9--9.6% of responses are syntactically valid but taxonomically nonexistent species names; the relative fabrication-rate ranking across models replicates exactly across both evaluation sets, a more robust finding than any single point estimate.

Camera-trap species classification is dominated by large models from well-resourced organisations, which often lack the species-level distinctions regional conservation needs, such as native red versus invasive grey squirrels in the UK. We ask whether open weights let a small team with a modest dataset and a single GPU take a real part in AI development. We fine-tuned the open DeepFaune classifier on 28 UK classes, paired it with the unmodified MegaDetector v6, and compared the resulting DeepFaune-UK v1.2 with DeepFaune v1.5.0 and SpeciesNet on 20,212 hand-verified MammalWeb citizen-science images, after removing sequences sharing any of 1,039 images with our training archive. DeepFaune-UK achieved a strict image-level accuracy of 88.8%, including empty frames, against 56.5% and 59.0% for the baselines, but at DeepFaune's coarser label resolution DeepFaune v1.5.0 was more accurate, though not significantly under contributor resampling (91.4% vs. 88.8%). As DeepFaune v1.5.0 uses a newer DINOv3-based classifier, we applied the identical recipe, without new data, to that classifier. The resulting DeepFaune-UK v1.3 reached 90.6% strict accuracy, narrowed the like-for-like gap to 0.8 points and reduced roe deer misclassified as fallow deer by 69%. On 1,850 images from the 26 contributors with no overlapping images, the three DeepFaune-based models did not differ significantly (90.5%, 90.6%, 89.9% like-for-like). Fine-tuning on 10% of the training crops (about 150 per class) gave out-of-distribution accuracy similar to using all of them, and a DINOv2 run on this subset took about 22 minutes with under 4 GB of GPU memory. Open weights thus make regional model development feasible for small teams, but the largest like-for-like gain came from a newer base model trained by others, so this democratisation depends on large actors continuing to release open weights, under licences that may change.

Place recognition is essential for long-term autonomous navigation, enabling loop closure and consistent mapping. Although deep learning has improved performance, deploying such models on resource-constrained platforms remains challenging. This work explores efficient LiDAR-based place recognition for EdgeAI by leveraging Bird's Eye View representations to enable lightweight image-based networks. We benchmark representative architectures without aggregation heads using a unified descriptor scheme based on global pooling and linear projection, and evaluate performance under FP32, FP16, and INT8 quantization. Experiments reveal trade-offs between accuracy, robustness, and efficiency: FP16 matches FP32 with lower cost, while INT8 introduces architecture-dependent degradation. Overall, the presented results are a strong basis for future research on 'use-case'-aware quantisation of Neural Networks for Edge deployment.