AniPrO: Interpretable Anime Image Provenance Detection via Multi-Dimensional Semantic Reasoning
Authors: Yan Liu, Baoxiang Huang, Zi'an Wang, Wenbo Xie
Organizations: School of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China · College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
As generative AI becomes increasingly used in anime-style image creation, distinguishing human-drawn, AI-inpainted, and text-to-image images is important for copyright attribution, visual provenance, and content governance. Existing AI-generated image detectors mainly target real-world photographs and often overlook anime-specific cues such as flat coloring, exaggerated structures, and artistic line control. To address this gap, we propose AniPrO, a multi-dimensional description-enhanced framework for interpretable anime image provenance. Built upon AnimeDL-2M, AniPrO contains 15,000 balanced samples from a 35,000-image candidate pool, covering Real, Inpainting, and Text2Image categories with structured five-dimensional descriptions. We further introduce AniPrO-SFD-Bench and AniPrO-MFR-Bench to evaluate provenance detection from statistical feature discrimination and multimodal fusion reasoning perspectives. Experiments show that structured semantic guidance reveals systematic AI-generation biases, such as the gap between global visual plausibility and local detail coherence, and improves the detection of challenging inpainting samples. The dataset and code will be released at: https://github.com/YAN-LIU05/AniPrO.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the proposed multi-dimensional description-enhanced framework. The pipeline consists of three main stages: (1) Dataset Construction of the AniPrO dataset; (2) Multi-dimensional Annotation, which extracts five-dimensional structured scores and texts using multimodal LLMs; and (3) A dual-track evaluation system utilizing Statistical Metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge for final AI vs. Real image discrimination.
Figure 2: Representative Real, Inpainting, and Text2Image samples from AniPrO with structured descriptions.
Features
Real Ret.
Inpainting Int.
T2I Int.
Overall Acc.
The Bucket Effect
0.883
0.321
0.561
0.588
Analysis of Variance
0.862
0.300
0.492
0.551
Skewness Analysis
0.644
0.390
0.485
0.506
Gap Analysis
0.768
0.495
0.762
0.675
Table 1: Univariate discriminatory performance based on derived statistical features using scores extracted from Gemini- 2.5 -Pro as an example.
Scoring Models
Real Ret.
Inpainting Int.
T2I Int.
Overall Acc.
GPT- 5.2
0.578±0.018
0.465±0.011
0.706±0.015
0.588±0.011
Gemini- 2.5 -Pro
0.841±0.014
0.428±0.021
0.838±0.014
0.702±0.007
Doubao- 1.5 -Vision-Pro
0.252±0.009
0.754±0.014
0.927±0.009
0.644±0.003
Qwen3-VL-235B
0.572±0.014
0.557±0.017
0.788±0.015
0.639±0.007
Qwen3-VL-30B
0.612±0.021
0.534±0.030
0.783±0.032
0.643±0.015
Llama- 4 -Maverick
0.459±0.021
0.599±0.026
0.764±0.012
0.607±0.009
Table 2: Results of 5 -fold cross-validation based on Random Forest.
Description Extraction Models
Real Ret.
Inpainting Int.
T2I Int.
Overall Acc.
GPT- 5.2
0.485
0.626
0.835
0.649
Gemini- 2.5 -Pro
0.584
0.657
0.967
0.738
Doubao- 1.5 -Vision-Pro
0.481
0.642
0.920
0.684
Qwen3-VL-235B
0.489
0.613
0.902
0.678
Qwen3-VL-30B
0.410
0.696
0.929
0.665
Llama- 4 -Maverick
0.479
0.663
0.934
0.695
Table 3: Results of AniPrO-MFR-Bench with GLM- 4.5 V as the fixed judge.
Judge Models
Experimental Setup
Real Ret.
Inpainting Int.
T2I Int.
Overall Acc.
Gemini- 2.5 -Pro
Image-Only
0.986
0.181
0.968
0.807
Gemini- 2.5 -Pro
Ours
0.938
0.501
0.970
0.825
GLM- 4.5 V
Image-Only
0.817
0.296
0.697
0.585
GLM- 4.5 V
Description-Only
0.630
0.522
0.838
0.663
GLM- 4.5 V
Ours
0.584
0.657
0.967
0.738
Table 4: Results of multimodal input ablation experiments. All descriptive texts are extracted uniformly by Gemini- 2.5 -Pro.
Table 6: Supervised visual classifiers and human rater baselines. Human results are averaged over five anime enthusiasts on a randomly sampled 10% subset.
AI-generated image detection identifies synthetic or AI-edited images and develops methods that generalize across generators, domains, and image transformations.
Detecting AI-generated images is only half the task: a deployed detector must also justify its verdict, yet existing detectors inherit three failure modes from their training data: real and fake images collected from different sources invite provenance shortcuts, supervised explanation corpora teach templated rationales, and a static forgery corpus leaves the decision boundary standing still while generators keep moving. We introduce \methodname{}, an adversarial reinforcement learning framework that pits two heterogeneous models against each other. A diffusion image editor learns to edit real photographs into fake counterparts of those same photographs that fool the current detector, while a reasoning MLLM learns to expose them with a verdict grounded in free-form reasoning. Both rewards are shortcut-proof by design: the attacker is credited only when its edit is faithfully executed, and the defender only when its verdict is correct. As the two models alternate, each round's attacker regenerates a harder training pool aimed at the current detector's blind spots, so the detector must generalize rather than memorize any fixed artifact distribution. Although the explanation is never rewarded, its quality rises round over round as a side effect of accuracy-only training. A detector trained within this loop improves monotonically across rounds on each of three external benchmarks.
Yicheng Bao, Xiahui Guo, Xuhong Wang +1
1East China Normal University · 2Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Rapid advances in image generation models call for interpretable AI-generated image detection methods that not only determine authenticity but also provide supporting visual evidence. Existing approaches may produce inconsistencies between generated explanations and localized evidence regions, undermining the reliability of explanations for authenticity decisions. Meanwhile, existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of the diverse human-centric scenes prevalent in generated imagery. To address these limitations, we investigate authenticity detection with grounded and explainable visual evidence in human-centric scenes. We present HAVE (Human-centric AI-generated Visual Evidence), a diverse human-centric dataset comprising 40K real and 39K AI-generated images from 10 recent generators, with 106K localized evidence instances across 8 evidence categories, each annotated with a bounding box and a region-aligned explanation. We further propose PAVE, a Perception-Aware Visual Evidence framework that jointly performs authenticity prediction, visual evidence grounding, and region-aligned explanation generation. PAVE employs a judge-guided alignment reward to assess region--explanation consistency and evidence validity, together with perception-aware regularization that contrasts token-level predictions between original and randomly masked images to promote reliance on visual input. Experiments on HAVE and external datasets demonstrate strong performance in authenticity detection, visual evidence grounding, and explanation quality. Code and data will be released upon publication.
Kun Guo, Yuzhou Yang, Haoyue Wang +3
College of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University · NVIDIA
Detecting AI-generated images (AIGI) remains challenging because detectors often fail to generalize to unseen generators. Although existing methods are trained on large datasets, their performance still degrades when generation settings change, indicating that data scale alone is insufficient and that limited coverage of generative variations during training is a key factor. Studies on generative model editing show that small changes in internal representations can produce diverse and meaningful image variations, many of which are not explored under standard sampling. Leveraging this insight, we propose PROBE (Probing Robustness via Boundary Exploration), a framework that improves detector generalization by actively exploring challenging regions of the generative process. Instead of treating the generator as a fixed data source, PROBE uses the detector as a critic to steer the generator through manifold-level modifications, producing realistic samples that are difficult to classify. These samples expose failure cases that are uncommon under standard data sampling strategies and are used to refine the detector. Experimental results across multiple benchmarks indicate that PROBE enhances generalization to unseen generators, resulting in more generalizable AIGI detection performance. Code and models are available at https://github.com/Amamiya-C/PROBE-AIGI-Detection
Zijie Cao, Weijie Tu, Yao Xiao +3
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China · Australian National University, Canberra, Australia · Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, China +1