While deep learning has enabled language decoding from intracranial brain recordings, extending this capability to non-invasive recordings remains an unresolved challenge. Decoding individual words from non-invasive brain recordings is particularly difficult, as word-level neural evidence is weak, temporally distributed, and entangled with acoustic, lexical, and semantic structure. Existing retrieval pipelines often collapse these factors into a single representation, potentially discarding information available at intermediate temporal scales. Here, we introduce Hierarchical Dynamic Neural Decoding (HDND), a hierarchical dynamic decoding framework that treats word decoding as structured refinement rather than flat label retrieval. HDND combines intermediate neural representations, contextual semantic predictions, and, for selected reading conditions, an auxiliary character-form objective. We evaluate HDND across seven electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) datasets spanning English, Dutch, Mandarin, and Cantonese listening, reading, and reading-aloud conditions. Across the nine-condition word-retrieval benchmark, the proposed HDND yields a higher participant-averaged balanced Top-10 point estimate than the matched contextual word-decoding baseline in every condition and achieves the highest mean among all compared methods in eight of nine conditions. Across the same nine matched conditions, HDND also yields higher token-micro and pooled word-macro Top-10 point estimates in every setting. Sentence retrieval favors HDND in eight of nine conditions, while auditory speech-segment retrieval is mixed across the six listening conditions. These results show that hierarchical residual refinement can improve multilingual word retrieval from heterogeneous non-invasive brain recordings.
In non-invasive neural language decoding, results can be inflated by sources that are not stimulus-evoked neural evidence: decoder priors, embedding-based metrics, and non-neural structural nuisances such as signal duration. The methodological challenge is therefore attribution: a reported gain is more informative when it can be traced to a specific source. We recast stimulus-locked MEG-to-audio retrieval as an auditing framework that separates apparent performance into three sources - structural shortcuts, window-level stimulus-locked evidence, and cross-window contextual aggregation - and provides a diagnostic for each. Signal-blind Gaussian noise reaches 66.3% Rank@1 (R@1) under variable-length decoding but collapses to near chance once fixed-duration windows and stimulus-identity splits are enforced, isolating structural leakage. Under these controls, fixed-window retrieval recovers measurable MEG-audio discriminability, while an oracle sentence-bucket diagnostic shows that 95.7% of Top-1 errors select the wrong sentence, localising the residual bottleneck to sentence-level competition. We audit this contextual source with Group Context Bias (GCB), an inference-time additive logit bias that pools sentence-consistent evidence across windows while leaving the base retrieval scores and candidate pool fixed. Used as a score-space intervention, GCB makes the contextual source measurable: R@1 shifts from 44% to 52% on Gwilliams and from 22% to 29% on MOUS under the same fixed setting. GCB is auditable under this design: its effect collapses under random-grouping perturbations and vanishes when local evidence is attenuated in MEG or is near chance in EEG, supporting its use as a controlled source-attribution intervention. These results suggest that brain-to-language performance should be source-attributed, not merely reported.
Continuous semantic reconstruction from non-invasive neural recordings remains limited by the representational mismatch between semantic feature spaces and neural coding patterns, which severely impedes cross-modal alignment between high-noise neural signals and target semantic features. Prior semantic decoders have predominantly relied on static lexical representations or dynamic contextualized representations in isolation. This single-dimension approach inevitably leads to severe information loss, as it fails to account for the human brain's capacity to integrate stable word attributes and dynamic contexts simultaneously.To bridge this gap, this study introduces a multi-feature fusion framework for non-invasive semantic reconstruction, systematically benchmarking two integration approaches: linear Naive Concatenation and non-linear Multi-Head Cross-Attention. Within this framework, our approach complements static lexical representations (W2V) with dynamic contextual representations (GPT) via an interactive gating mechanism to facilitate cooperative processing during language comprehension.Evaluated through extensive semantic reconstruction and text generation experiments, our framework reveals a robust performance hierarchy: Cross-Att > Concat > GPT > W2V. Crucially, the non-linear cross-attention fusion method achieves state-of-the-art performance, demonstrating that neural language decoding benefits from simulating the collaborative modulation between contextual information and core lexical attributes rather than depending on isolated individual features, while also offering a viable non-invasive brain-to-text decoding method.
Non-invasive speech decoding remains constrained by the low signal-to-noise ratio of neural recordings, which makes fine-grained reconstruction of phonemes or individual words difficult. Motivated by neuroscientific evidence that high-level semantic representations are distributed across cortical regions and evolve over slower temporal scales, we hypothesize that semantic content may provide a more suitable target for non-invasive decoding than low-level acoustic or lexical features. We introduce Brain2Semantics2Text, a method that reconstructs text through an intermediate semantic embedding space. Our model maps sentence-level MEG responses into a semantic manifold and then inverts the predicted embeddings into natural language. This semantic bottleneck enables recovery of high-level meaning without word-level alignment. We describe the core principles of the approach, its implementation, and the strategies used to mitigate the challenges of learning a reliable neural-to-semantic mapping. Finally, we compare against prior non-invasive Brain2Text methods and show improved sentence-level results.
Gilad D. Landau, Dulhan Jayalath, Oiwi Parker Jones