Visuomotor policies trained from a few demonstrations may reproduce demonstrated trajectories without reliably following changes in object position. Existing approaches with explicit attention typically obtain spatial priors from human annotation or visual models. We introduce TACIT (tactile contact informs attention), which uses measured tactile contacts from teleoperated demonstrations to supervise spatial attention without additional point annotation. Gaussian targets over preceding camera point clouds supervise an attention head whose pooled output conditions a visuotactile diffusion policy. Targets are used only during training; tactile observations remain inputs at inference. In the primary real-robot benchmark, with ten demonstrations per task and five demonstrated placement regions, TACIT achieves 66.7% success on ball placement and 73.3% on peg insertion, compared with 10.0% and 20.0% for input-matched 3D visuotactile fusion and 20.0% and 43.3% for vision-only DP3. TACIT enters the 150 mm palm-to-object approach region within 12 seconds in all 30 trials per task; all remaining failures occur after arrival. Across three training seeds on real ball and simulated peg, TACIT outperforms input-matched fusion and an architecture-matched control without explicit attention supervision, supporting the contribution of supervision beyond branch capacity. Pre-contact and contact-time supervision show no consistent ordering. These results demonstrate that measured tactile contact provides effective spatial supervision for approach behavior from few demonstrations within the evaluated workspace.
In contact-rich manipulation, visual observations primarily guide motion in free space, whereas tactile observations become particularly informative during contact. However, standard Transformer-based visuo-tactile policies typically rely on either token concatenation or learnable gating. These approaches lack explicit contact-aware priors, making it difficult to efficiently learn effective cross-modal representations from demonstrations. To address this limitation, we propose CAAT, a lightweight contact-aware framework that explicitly incorporates contact priors through attention scaling and dynamic tactile masking. Specifically, CAAT emphasizes visual information before contact and tactile information during contact. It also suppresses static background tokens by comparing the current tactile observation with a non-contact reference. CAAT can be integrated into commonly used Transformer-based policies without modifying their action decoders. In simulation, integrating CAAT with ACT improves the average success rate by 18.0 percentage points over direct visuo-tactile fusion and by 10.0 percentage points over gated fusion. In real-world experiments using a visuo-tactile UMI platform, CAAT achieves an average success rate of 60.0% across ACT, Diffusion Policy, and π0, outperforming the strongest baseline by an average of 21.1 percentage points. These results demonstrate that explicit contact priors and dynamic tactile masking are effective in improving visuo-tactile policy learning and task performance of diverse policy architectures. https://mrjiangjm.github.io/caat/
Contact-rich manipulation benefits from tactile feedback, yet physical tactile sensors introduce hardware, calibration, synchronization, and maintenance costs that complicate policy learning and deployment. We formulate predicted touch as an alternative to measured tactile input and present PredTac, a framework that learns to infer tactile states from causal visual observations and robot states and uses the predicted touch as an explicit interface for policy learning and execution. A tactile predictor is first trained with tactile supervision and then used to provide contact information without requiring measured tactile input during downstream policy training or execution. We evaluate PredTac across three contact-rich manipulation tasks in simulation and on a real robot, and further examine how policy performance depends on the predicted contact content. In simulation goal-offset evaluations, predicted-touch policies achieve 27.0%, 52.0%, and 44.7% success on USB, Barbed-spike, and Valve, respectively, improving over the visual baseline by 8.0-13.7 percentage points. On the real robot, predicted-touch ACT achieves 70.0%, 50.0%, and 90.0% success on USB insertion, Barbed extraction, and Valve rotation, respectively, with a three-task mean of 70.0%, approaching measured-touch ACT at 72.2% and substantially outperforming visual ACT at 21.1%. Fixed-policy interventions further show that performance is sensitive to the spatial structure of predicted contact, with spatial rearrangement at fixed value distributions reducing Valve success by 10.7 percentage points. These results demonstrate that predicted touch can provide useful contact information for contact-rich manipulation without requiring tactile sensing as a policy input.
Dexterous food manipulation requires control under deformation, occlusion, and uncertain contact. We present TacSushi, a tactile-grounded, Cosmos3-based world-action policy that learns from recorded future consequences while acting on current observations. The backbone encodes current RGB, language, and hand state, and feature-wise gated fusion incorporates fingertip tactile features into the action representation. During training, a decoder conditioned on demonstrated action chunks predicts logged future visual observations, task progress, relative contact risk, and tactile summaries; this decoder is removed at deployment. Failed trials provide consequence supervision, but their actions are excluded from imitation. We train TacSushi on 340 successful and 50 failed real-robot trials and compare six methods in 600 separate rollouts across three in-distribution tasks and two out-of-distribution ingredient variants. To assess food quality beyond a single geometric threshold, we score terminal outcomes using an anchored visual-quality protocol that equally weights five human ratings and three vision-language-model ratings per rollout. Full TacSushi achieves 68.3% average in-distribution success and 37.5% out-of-distribution success, compared with 36.7%/10.0% without future-consequence supervision and 25.0%/17.5% with direct tactile concatenation in place of gated fusion. These comparisons support complementary benefits of feature-wise gated tactile fusion and training-only predictive supervision.