ICDAR2026 Competition on Multimodal Reasoning over Documents in Multiple Domains

Multi-page Document Visual Question Answering requires reasoning over semantics, layouts, and visual elements in long, visually dense documents. Existing OCR-free methods face a trade-off between capacity and precision: end-to-end models scale poorly with document length, while visual retrieval-based pipelines are brittle and passive. We propose Doc-$V^*$, an OCR-free agentic framework that casts multi-page DocVQA as sequential evidence aggregation. Doc-$V^*$ begins with a thumbnail overview, then actively navigates via semantic retrieval and targeted page fetching, and aggregates evidence in a structured working memory for grounded reasoning. Trained by imitation learning from expert trajectories and further optimized with Group Relative Policy Optimization, Doc-$V^*$ balances answer accuracy with evidence-seeking efficiency. Across five benchmarks, Doc-$V^*$ outperforms open-source baselines and approaches proprietary models, improving out-of-domain performance by up to 47.9% over RAG baseline. Other results reveal effective evidence aggregation with selective attention, not increased input pages.

Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) presents a complex multimodal challenge, requiring models to exploit visual, textual, and layout information from documents. Although Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown remarkable performance in text-vision tasks, their robustness and transferability to different document domains remains underexplored. In this study, we present a comprehensive evaluation of 8 open-source pretrained VLMs on DocVQA in three different document domains: industrial documents of varying type, infographics, and presentation slides. We systematically assess model performance under zero-shot evaluations, fully supervised finetuning with inter- and intra-dataset evaluations, and few-shot learning evaluations of knowledge transfer between domains. Our findings demonstrate that while large pretrained VLMs possess strong zero-shot baselines for structured layouts, their performance strongly decreases on visually complex layouts of infographics and slides. Although parameter scaling is a dominant factor on performance, supervised finetuning yields higher relative gains in smaller architectures. Furthermore, our cross-domain and few-shot experiments show that visual understanding is the main bottleneck for DocVQA, not a lack of knowledge from the VLMs. Using 50 target domain samples, the models finetuned in DocVQA with datasets of different domains rapidly adapt to the target domain documents, even surpassing their fully supervised counterparts in some cases.

Multimodal document question answering requires retrieving dispersed evidence from visually rich long documents and performing reliable reasoning over heterogeneous information. Existing multimodal RAG systems remain limited by two bottlenecks: static retrieval that ignores query complexity, and end-to-end Vision-Language Models (VLMs) that couple visual perception with logical reasoning, leading to inefficient computation and unstable answer generation. We propose AutoThinkRAG, a complexity-aware inference architecture for multimodal document QA. It has two components: (1) a Query Complexity Router that analyzes query difficulty and structure to adaptively select retrieval and reasoning paths; and (2) a Perception--Reasoning Decoupling architecture that uses a lightweight VLM as a high-fidelity visual interpreter to convert query-relevant visual cues into textual representations, which are then passed to an LLM for logical reasoning and answer synthesis. This design improves both efficiency and robustness, especially on long-document and unanswerable queries. Experiments on DocBench and MMLongBench show that AutoThinkRAG achieves 82.13% and 51.29% overall accuracy, respectively, while reducing per-query token consumption by 18.9% and monetary cost by 18.2%. Further analyses show that the gains are most pronounced on complex queries requiring adaptive retrieval and multi-step reasoning.