Learning to Plan in Human-Robot Collaboration: Multimodal Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Interaction

Current vision-language-action (VLA) benchmarks primarily evaluate isolated manipulation skills while leaving human-robot interaction structure largely unmodeled. However, real-world collaboration fundamentally requires coordination under shared agency, including intent understanding, temporal synchronization, protocol adherence, and safe interaction in dynamic environments. To address this gap, we introduce HRIBench, a diagnostic benchmark for intent-aware human-robot collaboration based on executable interaction scenarios. HRIBench represents collaborative tasks as structured scenario scripts that explicitly model agent roles, temporal dependencies, coordination constraints, and human behavior distributions. Building on this abstraction, HRIBench defines three representative interaction roles: Instructor, Collaborator, and Intruder, covering intent communication, joint coordination, and robustness under human intervention. The benchmark contains 13 role-conditioned tasks with over 650 evaluation episodes generated from diverse interaction trajectories and scene variations. Beyond binary task success, HRIBench introduces interpretable interaction-centric metrics spanning synchronization, responsiveness, protocol compliance, and safety. We evaluate adapted policies based on GR00T, pi0.5, and ACT under a unified protocol. Results show that current foundation robot policies struggle substantially in collaborative settings despite strong manipulation ability, revealing major limitations in temporal coordination and intent-aware behavior. Fine-tuning on HRIBench consistently improves collaborative performance. In a real-world adaptation study, simulation data generated by HRIBench improves GR00T N1.5's physical-task success rate from 0.10 to 0.43, demonstrating the benchmark's value for advancing interaction-centric robot learning.

Multi-robot collaboration could enable more efficient and scalable solutions to complex robotic tasks, but collaboration under partial observability remains challenging. Natural-language communication offers a promising approach to coordinating robots under partial observability. However, in decentralized manipulation, jointly learning explicit inter-robot communication and skill-level action selection from multimodal demonstrations remains underexplored for small vision-language models (VLMs) intended for on-device deployment. To address this gap, we introduce RoboTalk, a synthetic data-generation pipeline and dataset of 7,950 multimodal trajectories spanning 53 mobile-manipulation kitchen tasks for training small VLMs to communicate and coordinate. The dataset includes a leader-follower planning protocol, tool calls (perception, manipulation, navigation, and communication), rationale traces, and diversified natural-language communication. Fine-tuning open-source models on our dataset can reach 77% success on novel held-out tasks, a significant improvement over the untuned open source models, which had a success rate of around ~2%.

Robots operating in human-centered environments are typically designed to execute explicit instructions, and most robot-learning datasets likewise pair observations with task instructions or low-level actions. Although recent work has begun to explore proactive embodied assistance, existing resources target different settings and action levels, leaving real-world human-centered multimodal decision-making underexplored. We formulate this problem as \textit{Proactive Robot Action Reasoning} (\textit{ProRobo}), an upstream cognitive decision problem in which a robot must determine which action to take based on multimodal human and environmental cues without explicit action instructions. To support ProRobo, we introduce \textit{ProAction}, a real-world multimodal dataset containing 10K samples of visual observations, audio signals, and text inputs across 12 daily-life scenarios in five common scenes. To construct cognitively grounded high-level action supervision, we develop a two-stage human-in-the-loop pipeline that combines appraisal-guided candidate generation with Affective Theory-of-Mind-guided human refinement, explicitly incorporating contextual judgment about human states, urgency, feasibility, and potential risk into action annotation. Based on this supervision, we benchmark representative Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) and introduce \textit{MMC2Act}, a reference model that implicitly learns the mapping from multimodal observations to cognitively grounded high-level actions. Experiments across modality settings, subject-disjoint generalization, cross-dataset transfer, and human evaluation show that general-purpose MLLMs struggle with proactively reasoning high-level actions from multimodal cues, whereas training on \textit{ProAction} substantially improves performance.